Skip to main content

Assessment for Learning in the L2 Writing Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts
  • 3863 Accesses

Abstract

Assessment for learning (AfL), i.e., using assessment to promote learning and improve teaching, has gained wide currency in the educational policy in different parts of the world. In the United Kingdom, the Assessment Reform Group (2002), with which the notion of AfL is closely affiliated, has played a pivotal role in bringing about positive change to assessment practice, policy, and research in not only the United Kingdom (see Black and Wiliam 2003) but also other parts of the world. In Australia, for instance, AfL has now become a central plank of curriculum reform. The national curriculum framework has put the improvement of learning and teaching as the primary function of assessment (Australian Capital Territory 2005; Queensland Studies Authority 2005). Research conducted on AfL in Queensland schools has demonstrated the beneficial outcomes of AfL practices in Australian secondary education (Sebba 2006; Sebba and Maxwell 2005). In the United States, more than a decade ago, there has already been a clarion call for a more balanced approach to assessment that comprises not only standardized achievement tests but also learning-oriented assessment that informs instructional decision-making and turns learners into assessors (Stiggins 1999, 2007). Currently, AfL is an integral part of professional development initiatives that address classroom assessment in US schools. The Formative Assessment for Students and Teachers (FAST), for example, has promoted the implementation of AfL in classrooms to positively influence teaching and learning nationwide. In Hong Kong, AfL has been identified as one of the most important items on the English language education reform agenda (Curriculum Development Council 2004, 2007; Curriculum Development Institute 2004). The oral assessment innovation in school-based assessment at Secondary 4 and 5 (Grades 10 and 11) is a recent initiative to promote AfL in English (Davison 2007). In 2001, Taiwan introduced a nationwide curriculum reform in primary and secondary education, advocating a variety of assessment strategies to promote student learning. In China, “The Outlines for Basic Educational Reform (Pilot)” issued by the Education Department of China in 2001 refers to assessment as a means to promote learning, and teachers are encouraged to integrate self- and peer assessment into the curriculum. In brief, AfL has become a priority in the educational reform policy worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antonious, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arkoudis, A., & O’Loughin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Testing, 21, 284–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Capital Territory. (2005). Every chance to learn. Curriculum for ACT schools P-10: Principles and framework (Phase 1). Canberra: Australian Capital Territory Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berchoud, M., Cignatta, T., Mentz, O., Pamula, M., & Piccardo, E. (2011). Pathways through assessing, learning and teaching in the CEFR. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., Kettle, M., Klenowski, V., & May, L. (2013). Interpretations of formative assessment in the teaching of English at two Chinese universities: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment and Education in Higher Education, 38(7), 831–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., & O’Loughlin, K. (2013). Continuous assessment frameworks within university English pathway programs: Realizing formative assessment within high-stakes contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2004). English language education key learning area: English language curriculum guide (Primary 1–6). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council. (2007). English language curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Institute. (2004). Promoting assessment for learning in English language education at primary level. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment for learning; Assessment as learning: Changing practices means changing beliefs. In Hong Kong Education Bureau (Ed.), Assessment and learning (Issue 2) (pp. 1–5). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment and feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2006). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardener (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 171–184). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2014). Assessment for learning in the writing classroom: An incomplete realisation. The Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 210–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S.-C. (2012). Like a bell responding to a striker: Instruction contingent on assessment. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(4), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S.-C. (2016). No longer a teacher monologue – involving EFL writing learners in teachers’ assessment and feedback processes. Taiwan TESOL Journal, 13(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huot, B. (2002). (Re)-Articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Logan: Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. (2011). Assessment for learning: Research and policy in the (Dis)United Kingdom. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 15–32). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2010). The role of assessment for learning in the management of primary to secondary transition: Implications for language teachers. Language Learning Journal, 35(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laflen, A., & Smith, M. (2017). Responding to student writing online: Tracking student interactions with instructor feedback in a Learning Management System. Assessing Writing; 31, 39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2011). Bringing innovation to EFL writing through a focus on assessment for learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-W. (Ed.). (2015). Diagnosing diagnostic language assessment. Language Testing, 32(3), 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Falvey, P. (2014). Perspectives on assessment for learning in Hong Kong writing classrooms. In D. Coniam (Ed.), English language education and assessment: Recent developments in Hong Kong and Chinese Mainland (pp. 221–236). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, P., & Lee, I. (2014). Implementing assessment for learning in L2 writing: An activity theory perspective. System, 47, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, C. M., Brookhart, S. M., & Long, B. A. (2013). Administrators’ roles in helping teachers use formative assessment information. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority. (2005). Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au

  • Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, J. (2006). Policy and practice in assessment for learning: The experience of selected OECD countries. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 185–196). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, J., & Maxwell, G. (2005). Queensland, AUS: An outcomes-based curriculum. In Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 191–204). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seong, Y. (2011). The teachers’ role in classroom-based language assessment. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafini, F. (2000/2001). Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure, and inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 384–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (2007). Assessment through the students’ eyes. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M., & Jones, J. (2009). Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the curriculum. In D. Scoop (Ed.), Curriculum and assessment (pp. 165–181). Westport: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2005). Effective learning and teaching of writing: A handbook of writing in education. New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung, B. H. W. (2002). Same assessment, different practice: Professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers’ practice in a school-based assessment scheme. Assessment in Education, 9(1), 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, I. (2017). Assessment for Learning in the L2 Writing Classroom. In: Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3922-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3924-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics