Abstract
Assessment for learning (AfL), i.e., using assessment to promote learning and improve teaching, has gained wide currency in the educational policy in different parts of the world. In the United Kingdom, the Assessment Reform Group (2002), with which the notion of AfL is closely affiliated, has played a pivotal role in bringing about positive change to assessment practice, policy, and research in not only the United Kingdom (see Black and Wiliam 2003) but also other parts of the world. In Australia, for instance, AfL has now become a central plank of curriculum reform. The national curriculum framework has put the improvement of learning and teaching as the primary function of assessment (Australian Capital Territory 2005; Queensland Studies Authority 2005). Research conducted on AfL in Queensland schools has demonstrated the beneficial outcomes of AfL practices in Australian secondary education (Sebba 2006; Sebba and Maxwell 2005). In the United States, more than a decade ago, there has already been a clarion call for a more balanced approach to assessment that comprises not only standardized achievement tests but also learning-oriented assessment that informs instructional decision-making and turns learners into assessors (Stiggins 1999, 2007). Currently, AfL is an integral part of professional development initiatives that address classroom assessment in US schools. The Formative Assessment for Students and Teachers (FAST), for example, has promoted the implementation of AfL in classrooms to positively influence teaching and learning nationwide. In Hong Kong, AfL has been identified as one of the most important items on the English language education reform agenda (Curriculum Development Council 2004, 2007; Curriculum Development Institute 2004). The oral assessment innovation in school-based assessment at Secondary 4 and 5 (Grades 10 and 11) is a recent initiative to promote AfL in English (Davison 2007). In 2001, Taiwan introduced a nationwide curriculum reform in primary and secondary education, advocating a variety of assessment strategies to promote student learning. In China, “The Outlines for Basic Educational Reform (Pilot)” issued by the Education Department of China in 2001 refers to assessment as a means to promote learning, and teachers are encouraged to integrate self- and peer assessment into the curriculum. In brief, AfL has become a priority in the educational reform policy worldwide.
References
Antonious, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 153–176.
Arkoudis, A., & O’Loughin, K. (2004). Tensions between validity and outcomes: Teacher assessment of written work of recently arrived immigrant ESL students. Language Testing, 21, 284–304.
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education.
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Australian Capital Territory. (2005). Every chance to learn. Curriculum for ACT schools P-10: Principles and framework (Phase 1). Canberra: Australian Capital Territory Government.
Berchoud, M., Cignatta, T., Mentz, O., Pamula, M., & Piccardo, E. (2011). Pathways through assessing, learning and teaching in the CEFR. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9–19.
Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956–983.
Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 39–54.
Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York: Routledge.
Chen, Q., Kettle, M., Klenowski, V., & May, L. (2013). Interpretations of formative assessment in the teaching of English at two Chinese universities: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment and Education in Higher Education, 38(7), 831–846.
Cross, R., & O’Loughlin, K. (2013). Continuous assessment frameworks within university English pathway programs: Realizing formative assessment within high-stakes contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 584–594.
Curriculum Development Council. (2004). English language education key learning area: English language curriculum guide (Primary 1–6). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.
Curriculum Development Council. (2007). English language curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.
Curriculum Development Institute. (2004). Promoting assessment for learning in English language education at primary level. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.
Davison, C. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 37–68.
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment for learning; Assessment as learning: Changing practices means changing beliefs. In Hong Kong Education Bureau (Ed.), Assessment and learning (Issue 2) (pp. 1–5). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Government Printer.
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment and feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120.
Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College.
Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547.
Harlen, W. (2006). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardener (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 171–184). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2014). Assessment for learning in the writing classroom: An incomplete realisation. The Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 210–237.
Huang, S.-C. (2012). Like a bell responding to a striker: Instruction contingent on assessment. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(4), 99–119.
Huang, S.-C. (2016). No longer a teacher monologue – involving EFL writing learners in teachers’ assessment and feedback processes. Taiwan TESOL Journal, 13(1), 1–31.
Huot, B. (2002). (Re)-Articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Logan: Utah State University Press.
James, M. (2011). Assessment for learning: Research and policy in the (Dis)United Kingdom. In R. Berry & B. Adamson (Eds.), Assessment reform in education: Policy and practice (pp. 15–32). Dordrecht: Springer.
Jones, J. (2010). The role of assessment for learning in the management of primary to secondary transition: Implications for language teachers. Language Learning Journal, 35(2), 175–191.
Laflen, A., & Smith, M. (2017). Responding to student writing online: Tracking student interactions with instructor feedback in a Learning Management System. Assessing Writing; 31, 39–52
Lee, I. (2011). Bringing innovation to EFL writing through a focus on assessment for learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 19–33.
Lee, Y.-W. (Ed.). (2015). Diagnosing diagnostic language assessment. Language Testing, 32(3), 299–316.
Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34–50.
Lee, I., & Falvey, P. (2014). Perspectives on assessment for learning in Hong Kong writing classrooms. In D. Coniam (Ed.), English language education and assessment: Recent developments in Hong Kong and Chinese Mainland (pp. 221–236). Singapore: Springer.
Mak, P., & Lee, I. (2014). Implementing assessment for learning in L2 writing: An activity theory perspective. System, 47, 73–87.
Marshall, B., & Drummond, M. J. (2006). How teachers engage with assessment for learning: Lessons from the classroom. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 133–149.
Moss, C. M., Brookhart, S. M., & Long, B. A. (2013). Administrators’ roles in helping teachers use formative assessment information. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 205–218.
Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 68–85.
Queensland Studies Authority. (2005). Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au
Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: A learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163–188.
Sebba, J. (2006). Policy and practice in assessment for learning: The experience of selected OECD countries. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 185–196). London: Sage.
Sebba, J., & Maxwell, G. (2005). Queensland, AUS: An outcomes-based curriculum. In Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 191–204). Paris: OECD.
Seong, Y. (2011). The teachers’ role in classroom-based language assessment. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 50–52.
Serafini, F. (2000/2001). Three paradigms of assessment: Measurement, procedure, and inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 384–393.
Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18(1), 23–27.
Stiggins, R. J. (2007). Assessment through the students’ eyes. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 22–26.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, M., & Jones, J. (2009). Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(2), 165–184.
Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the curriculum. In D. Scoop (Ed.), Curriculum and assessment (pp. 165–181). Westport: Ablex.
Williams, J. (2005). Effective learning and teaching of writing: A handbook of writing in education. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297.
Yung, B. H. W. (2002). Same assessment, different practice: Professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers’ practice in a school-based assessment scheme. Assessment in Education, 9(1), 101–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, I. (2017). Assessment for Learning in the L2 Writing Classroom. In: Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3922-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3924-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)