Abstract
In the process of decision making, the decision maker may be more rational and suitable to express his/her preferences by comparing each pair of objects and constructs a preference relation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2009) Individual and social strategies to deal with ignorance situations in multi-person decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 8:313–333
Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 8:109–131
Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:528–540
Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S (2009a) A note on two methods for estimating missing pairwise preference values. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 39:1628–1633
Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009b) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relation: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:14–23
Fan ZP, Ma J, Jiang YP, Sun YH, Ma L (2006) A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 174:311–321
Gong ZW, Li LS, Cao J, Zhou FX (2010) On additive consistent properties of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 9:1009–1025
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120:144–161
Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154:98–109
Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B 37:176–189
Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014a) Some algorithms for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. Int J Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 22(4):505–529
Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014b) Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 29(11):971–993
Liao HC, Xu ZS (2015) Consistency of the fused intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation in group intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl Soft Comput 35:812–826
Liao HC, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2014a) Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 13(1):47–76
Liao HC, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2014b) Multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(6):2969–2985
Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ, Merigó JM (2015) Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(4):1211–1227
Liu HF, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2016) The multiplicative consistency index of hesitant fuzzy preference relation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24(1):82–93
Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Ma L (2006) A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:20–33
Mata F, MartÃnez L, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) An adaptive consensus support model for group decision making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:279–290
Ngwenyama O, Bryson N (1999) Eliciting and mapping qualitative preferences to numeric rankings in group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 116:487–497
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131
Tapia GarcÃa JM, del Moral MJ, Martinez MA, Herrera-Viedma E (2012) A consensus model for group decision making problems with interval fuzzy preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 11(4):709–725
Tzeng GH, Chiang CH, Li CW (2007) Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning program: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst Appl 32:1028–1044
Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011a) Methods for fuzzy complementary preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Comput Ind Eng 61(4):930–935
Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011b) Some issues on multiplicative consistency of interval reciprocal relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 10:1043–1065
Xia MM, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2013) Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21:113–133
Xu ZS (2004) On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 3:217–225
Xu ZS (2005) An approach to group decision making based on incomplete linguistic preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 4:153–160
Xu ZS (2006) Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion. Inf Fusion 7:331–337
Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf Sci 177:2363–2379
Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2011) Group consensus algorithms based on preference relations. Inf Sci 181:150–162
Xu ZS, Liao HC (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):749–761
Xu ZS, Liao HC (2015) A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 80:131–142
Xu ZS, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 8:123–139
Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liao, H., Xu, Z. (2017). Decision Making with Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relation. In: Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making Methodologies and Applications . Uncertainty and Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3265-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3265-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3264-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3265-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)