Skip to main content

Scaling Up Assessment for Learning: Progress and Prospects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education

Part of the book series: The Enabling Power of Assessment ((EPAS,volume 5))

Abstract

A definition of assessment for learning (AfL) is provided. From a synthesis of relevant literature, I outline four main AfL strategies: productive assessment task design, effective feedback processes, the development of student understanding of quality and activities where students make judgments. I explore the notion of scaling up in relation to spread, depth, sustainability and shifts in ownership. Then I present a rationale for the scaling up of AfL following from dissatisfaction with current practices and persuasive research evidence on practices congruent with AfL. I relate the notion of scaling up to the geographical spread of AfL research activity, its somewhat modest impact on university assessment policies and in relation to the expansion of feedback research. I then consider what conditions might facilitate deeper and broader implementation of AfL, including the role of quality assurance, the importance of leadership and incentives, the development of assessment literacy through professional development activities and the potential of technology to act as a lever for enabling AfL strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2012). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2010). Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes. Australasian student engagement report. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baartman, L., Bastiaens, T., Kirschner, P., & van der Vleuten, C. (2007). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevitt, S. (2015). Assessment innovation and student experience: A new assessment challenge and call for a multi-perspective approach to assessment research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & McCormick, R. (2010). Reflections and new directions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 493–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2007). Reframing assessment as if learning were important. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 181–197). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2014). Shifting views of assessment: From secret teachers’ business to sustaining learning. In C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistle, & J. McArthur (Eds.), Advances and innovations in university assessment and feedback (pp. 13–31). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Assessment-2020_propositions_final.pdf

  • Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., Kettle, M., Klenowski, V., & May, L. (2013). Interpretations of formative assessment in the teaching of English at two Chinese universities: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 831–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Struyven, K. (2007). Assessment engineering: Breaking down barriers between teaching and learning, and assessment. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 87–100). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 23–36). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2014). National student survey. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/lt/publicinfo/nss/

  • Kezar, A. (2011). What is the best way to achieve broader reach of improved practices in education? Innovative Higher Education, 36(4), 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. (1995). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, S., & Wiliam, D. (2012). From teachers to schools: Scaling up professional development for formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 49–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L., Davidson, S., McKenzie, L., Rees, M., Fletcher, R., & Johnston, P. (2010). An investigation of tertiary assessment policy and practice: Alignment and contradictions. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D., & Draper, S. (2009). A blueprint for transformational organizational change in higher education: REAP as a case study. In T. Mayes, D. Morrison, H. Mellar, P. Bullen, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Transforming higher education through technology-enhanced learning (pp. 191–207). York, UK: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, L., Norton, B., & Shannon, L. (2013). Revitalising assessment design: What is holding new lecturers back? Higher Education, 66(2), 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, M., Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Handley, K. (2012). Assessment literacy: The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J., Narciss, S., & Dunnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vleuten, C., & Schuwirth, L. (2005). Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39(3), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2007). Content then process: Teacher learning communities in the service of formative assessment. In D. Reeves (Ed.), Ahead of the curve: The power of assessment to transform teaching and learning (pp. 183–206). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–84). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Kane, D. (2009). Assessment and feedback: Institutional experiences of student feedback, 1996–2007. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(3), 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Carless .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carless, D. (2017). Scaling Up Assessment for Learning: Progress and Prospects. In: Carless, D., Bridges, S., Chan, C., Glofcheski, R. (eds) Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. The Enabling Power of Assessment, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3043-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3045-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics