Skip to main content

The Triumph (?) of Western Law: A Contemporary Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order

Part of the book series: Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific ((ELIAP))

  • 832 Accesses

Abstract

For nearly a millennium, private law was primary in the West. By the mid-twentieth century, Western private law had become virtually universal—an apparent triumph of Western influence. By then, however, regulatory and criminal law, core features of law in the world’s largest and oldest nation-state—China—had replaced private law at least in the volume of rules and cases. Has Western law triumphed after all? Or has, instead, the world of law in the twenty-first century more appropriately viewed as the ultimate “triumph” of the world’s oldest and most enduring legal tradition? If so, perhaps, the West has something to learn from the East, particularly the success of the contemporary Japanese criminal justice system in its avoidance incarceration and other retributive sanctions by distinguishing condemnation of the crime with correction and reintegration of the criminal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the early development of China’s centralized bureaucratic system, see Li (2008) and Lewis (2007).

  2. 2.

    It may be useful to recall that the T’ang Code, the historically most influential but not the first dynastic code, was promulgated (624 CE) just a century after Justinian’s codex, which included the Corpus Juris Civilis (completed 529 CE).

  3. 3.

    See Knoblock (1988), vol. 3, p. 166.

  4. 4.

    Jiang (2011), p. 44.

  5. 5.

    The terminology and conceptualizations of common law and civil law systems differ and perfect equivalents are difficult to express in any language. English after all is the language of and, with the exception of the Civil Code of Louisiana, only the common law with no semantic equivalents in other languages.

  6. 6.

    Bressman et al. (2010), p. xxi.

  7. 7.

    See, e.g., Majone (1994).

  8. 8.

    Judicial Council of California (2013), Court Statistics Report: Statewide Caseload Trends 2002–2003 Through 2011–2012, p. xvii. http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/2013-Court-Statistics-Report.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016.

  9. 9.

    Mauer et al. (2004), p. 3.

  10. 10.

    See John S. and Baker Jr., Revisiting the Explosive Growth of Federal Crimes (Heritage Foundation, Legal Memorandum No. 26, 16 June 2008), http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2008/pdf/lm26.pdf

  11. 11.

    See Tracking the Growth of Federal Criminal Sentences, Gary Fields and John R. Emshwiller, As Federal Crime List Grows, Threshold of Guilt Declines, The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904060604576570801651620000.html#project%3DCRIMES_FEDOFFENSES_1107%26articleTabs%3Dinteractive. Accessed 29 December 2015.

  12. 12.

    Brook et al. (2008), p. 28.

  13. 13.

    Colonization has been the principal cause of the globalization of Western law. By the dawn of the twentieth century, only a handful of countries outside of the Ottoman and Russian empires remained independent states: Ethiopia, Persia (Iran), a cluster of Himalayan kingdoms, Thailand, China, and Japan.

  14. 14.

    Western and Pettit (2010). See also Lawrence (2014), p. 992.

  15. 15.

    Western and Pettit (2010), p. 2.

  16. 16.

    See Lawrence (2014), p. 992.

  17. 17.

    Judicial Caning in Singapore, Malaysia, and Brunei, World Corporal Punishment Research. http://www.corpun.com/singfeat.htm. Accessed 29 December 2015.

  18. 18.

    Id.

  19. 19.

    See US Department of State, OSAC Singapore 2013 Crime and Safety Report, https://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=13850. Accessed 29 December 2015. In the early 1980s, crime rates for murder, sexual offenses, and thefts in the early 1980s were considered close to the median. However, the rate for assaults was apparently comparatively low. See Crime and Society: Singapore, http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/rwinslow/asia_pacific/singapore.html. Accessed 29 December 2015. For the most recent official report on crime in Singapore, see Singapore Police Force, http://www.spf.gov.sg/stats/crimebrief2013.html. Accessed 29 December 2015.

  20. 20.

    With 233 persons per 100, 000 in prison, Singapore has a significantly higher rate of incarceration than any of its European or Asian peers. See International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, Singapore, http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/singapore. Accessed 29 December 2015.

  21. 21.

    International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All&=Apply. Accessed 29 December 2015.

  22. 22.

    International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, Singapore, http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/singapore. Accessed 29 December 2015.

  23. 23.

    Jarmal Singh (2000), Crime Prevention—The Singapore Approach, pp. 140–150 (Asia and Far East Institute or the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (UNAFEI), 112th International Training Course Visiting Experts Papers, Resource Materials No. 56), http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No56/No56_00All.pdf. Accessed 1 January 2016.

  24. 24.

    Singapore Prison Service [SPS] (2012), Stronger Community and Family Support Help Keep Recidivism Rates Low as SPS Maintains Focus on its Through-CRE Philosophy, http://www.sps.gov.sg/sites/default/files/2012%20Prisons%20Annual%20Statistics%20Release%201%20Feb%202012.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016.

  25. 25.

    Community sentences are not permitted in cases involving offenses punishable by more than 3 years of imprisonment or a mandatory minimum sentence. Or the offender had been previously detained or subjected to police supervision or sentenced to imprisonment, corrective training, reformative training, or preventative detention. See Amirthalingam (2013), pp. 533–534; Singapore Code Criminal Procedure §337.

  26. 26.

    The paragraph that follows summarizes the ultimate conclusions of three seminal works published almost simultaneously between 1989 and 1991: Braithwaite (1989), Tyler (1990), and Ellickson (1991). Each has spawned a copious corpus of subsequent research. In combination they show that norms accepted by community consensus as legitimate are adhered to without formal law enforcement regardless of their legal status.

  27. 27.

    Haley (1982), pp. 269–273.

  28. 28.

    Haley (2011a, b, 2009, 1999, 1996, 1992, 1989).

  29. 29.

    Haley (1982), pp. 269–273.

  30. 30.

    See Ministry of Justice (2013), White Paper on Crime, http://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/en/62/nfm/mokuji.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2016.

  31. 31.

    Id. Table 2-3-2-1, p. 26.

  32. 32.

    Johnson (2002).

  33. 33.

    Rayment (1999), pp. 4–5. Data from survey of 57 of 120 prosecutors in the King County Prosecutors Office, Seattle, Washington, based on a similar survey of Japanese prosecutors by David Johnson in his 1996 University of California dissertation, subsequently published as noted above.).

  34. 34.

    See Haley (1998).

  35. 35.

    Foote (1992).

  36. 36.

    Rayment (1999).

  37. 37.

    Haley (1991), p. 137.

  38. 38.

    Schwartz (2009).

References

  • Amirthalingam K (2013) Criminal justice and diversionary programmes in Singapore. Crim Law Forum 24:527–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker John S Jr. (2008) Revisiting the explosive growth of federal crimes. Heritage Foundation, Legal Memorandum No. 26, 16 June 2008. http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2008/pdf/lm26.pdf

  • Braithwaite J (1989) Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bressman LS, Rubin EL, Stack KM (2010) The regulatory state. Aspen Publishers, Netherland

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook T, Bourgon J, Blue G (2008) Death by a thousand cuts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Crime and Society: Singapore. http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/rwinslow/asia_pacific/singapore.html, Accessed 29 Dec 2015.

  • Ellickson RC (1991) Order without law: how neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote DH (1992) Benevolent paternalism of Japanese criminal justice. Calif Law Rev 80:317–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (1982) Sheathing the sword of justice in Japan: an essay on law without sanctions. J Jpn Stud 8:265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (1989) Confession, repentance and absolution. In: Wright M, Galaway B (eds) Mediation and criminal justice: victims, offenders, and community. Sage, London, pp 195–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (1991) Authority without power: law and the Japanese paradox. Oxford University Press, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (1996) Crime prevention through restorative justice: lessons from Japan. In: Galaway B, Hudson J (eds) Restorative justice: international perspectives. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, pp 349–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (1998) The spirit of Japanese law. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (1999) Apology and pardon: learning from Japan. In: Etzioni A (ed) Civic repentance. Rowman Littlefield, Lanham, pp 96–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (2009) Comment on using criminal punishment to serve both victim and social needs. Law Contemp Probl 72:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (2011a) Introduction – beyond retribution: an integrated approach to restorative justice. Wash Univ J Law Policy 36:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley JO (2011b) Japan. In: Heller KJ, Dubber MD (eds) The handbook of comparative criminal law. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 393–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley John O (1992) Victim-offender mediation: Japanese and American comparisons. In: Messmer H Otto H-U (eds) Restorative justice on trial: pitfalls and potentials of victim-offender mediation—international research perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 105–130 (Assisted by Ann Marie Neugebauer)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All&=Apply. Accessed 29 Dec 2015.

  • Jiang Y (2011) The mandate of heaven and the great Ming code. University of Washington Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DT (2002) The Japanese way of justice: prosecuting crime in Japan. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Judicial Caning in Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei, World Corporal Punishment Research. http://www.corpun.com/singfeat.htm. Accessed 29 Dec 2015.

  • Judicial Council of California (2013) Court statistics report: statewide caseload trends 2002–2003 through 2011–2012. http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/2013-Court-Statistics-Report.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2016.

  • Knoblock J (1988) Xunzi: a translation and study of his complete works. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JC (2014) ASFA in the Age of mass incarceration: go to prison—lose your child? William Mitchell Law Rev 40:990–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis ME (2007) The early Chinese empires: “Qin” and “Han”. The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Li F (2008) Bureaucracy and the state in early China: governing the western Zhou. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone G (1994) The rise of the regulatory state in western Europe. West Eur Polit 17:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauer M, King RS, Young MC (2004) The meaning of “life”: long prison sentences in context. The Sentencing Project, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice (2013) White paper on crime, http://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/en/62/nfm/mokuji.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2016 (Japan).

  • Rayment L (1999) A comparative look at prosecutorial objectives. Analytical research paper, University of Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz S (2009) Dreams from the Monster factory: a tale of prison, redemption and one woman’s fight to restore justice to all. Scribner, New York (with David Boodell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Police Force, http://www.spf.gov.sg/stats/crimebrief2013.html. Accessed 29 Dec 2015

  • Singapore Prison Service [SPS] (2012) Stronger community and family support help keep recidivism rates low as SPS maintains focus on its through-CRE philosophy, http://www.sps.gov.sg/sites/default/files/2012%20Prisons%20Annual%20Statistics%20Release%201%20Feb%202012.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2016

  • Singh J (2000) Crime prevention—the Singapore approach, pp 140–150 (Asia and far east institute or the prevention of crime and the treatment of offenders (UNAFEI), 112th international training course visiting experts papers, resource materials No. 56). http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No56/No56_00All.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2016

  • Tyler TR (1990) Why people obey the law: procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of State, OSAC Singapore (2013) Crime and safety report. https://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=13850. Accessed 29 Dec 2015

  • Western B, Pettit B (2010) Collateral costs: incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Owen Haley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haley, J.O., Orthwein, W.R. (2016). The Triumph (?) of Western Law: A Contemporary Perspective. In: Lo, Cf., Li, N., Lin, Ty. (eds) Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order. Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1994-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1995-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics