Abstract
For nearly a millennium, private law was primary in the West. By the mid-twentieth century, Western private law had become virtually universal—an apparent triumph of Western influence. By then, however, regulatory and criminal law, core features of law in the world’s largest and oldest nation-state—China—had replaced private law at least in the volume of rules and cases. Has Western law triumphed after all? Or has, instead, the world of law in the twenty-first century more appropriately viewed as the ultimate “triumph” of the world’s oldest and most enduring legal tradition? If so, perhaps, the West has something to learn from the East, particularly the success of the contemporary Japanese criminal justice system in its avoidance incarceration and other retributive sanctions by distinguishing condemnation of the crime with correction and reintegration of the criminal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
It may be useful to recall that the T’ang Code, the historically most influential but not the first dynastic code, was promulgated (624 CE) just a century after Justinian’s codex, which included the Corpus Juris Civilis (completed 529 CE).
- 3.
See Knoblock (1988), vol. 3, p. 166.
- 4.
Jiang (2011), p. 44.
- 5.
The terminology and conceptualizations of common law and civil law systems differ and perfect equivalents are difficult to express in any language. English after all is the language of and, with the exception of the Civil Code of Louisiana, only the common law with no semantic equivalents in other languages.
- 6.
Bressman et al. (2010), p. xxi.
- 7.
See, e.g., Majone (1994).
- 8.
Judicial Council of California (2013), Court Statistics Report: Statewide Caseload Trends 2002–2003 Through 2011–2012, p. xvii. http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/2013-Court-Statistics-Report.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016.
- 9.
Mauer et al. (2004), p. 3.
- 10.
See John S. and Baker Jr., Revisiting the Explosive Growth of Federal Crimes (Heritage Foundation, Legal Memorandum No. 26, 16 June 2008), http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2008/pdf/lm26.pdf
- 11.
See Tracking the Growth of Federal Criminal Sentences, Gary Fields and John R. Emshwiller, As Federal Crime List Grows, Threshold of Guilt Declines, The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904060604576570801651620000.html#project%3DCRIMES_FEDOFFENSES_1107%26articleTabs%3Dinteractive. Accessed 29 December 2015.
- 12.
Brook et al. (2008), p. 28.
- 13.
Colonization has been the principal cause of the globalization of Western law. By the dawn of the twentieth century, only a handful of countries outside of the Ottoman and Russian empires remained independent states: Ethiopia, Persia (Iran), a cluster of Himalayan kingdoms, Thailand, China, and Japan.
- 14.
- 15.
Western and Pettit (2010), p. 2.
- 16.
See Lawrence (2014), p. 992.
- 17.
Judicial Caning in Singapore, Malaysia, and Brunei, World Corporal Punishment Research. http://www.corpun.com/singfeat.htm. Accessed 29 December 2015.
- 18.
Id.
- 19.
See US Department of State, OSAC Singapore 2013 Crime and Safety Report, https://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=13850. Accessed 29 December 2015. In the early 1980s, crime rates for murder, sexual offenses, and thefts in the early 1980s were considered close to the median. However, the rate for assaults was apparently comparatively low. See Crime and Society: Singapore, http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/rwinslow/asia_pacific/singapore.html. Accessed 29 December 2015. For the most recent official report on crime in Singapore, see Singapore Police Force, http://www.spf.gov.sg/stats/crimebrief2013.html. Accessed 29 December 2015.
- 20.
With 233 persons per 100, 000 in prison, Singapore has a significantly higher rate of incarceration than any of its European or Asian peers. See International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, Singapore, http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/singapore. Accessed 29 December 2015.
- 21.
International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All&=Apply. Accessed 29 December 2015.
- 22.
International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, Singapore, http://www.prisonstudies.org/country/singapore. Accessed 29 December 2015.
- 23.
Jarmal Singh (2000), Crime Prevention—The Singapore Approach, pp. 140–150 (Asia and Far East Institute or the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (UNAFEI), 112th International Training Course Visiting Experts Papers, Resource Materials No. 56), http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No56/No56_00All.pdf. Accessed 1 January 2016.
- 24.
Singapore Prison Service [SPS] (2012), Stronger Community and Family Support Help Keep Recidivism Rates Low as SPS Maintains Focus on its Through-CRE Philosophy, http://www.sps.gov.sg/sites/default/files/2012%20Prisons%20Annual%20Statistics%20Release%201%20Feb%202012.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016.
- 25.
Community sentences are not permitted in cases involving offenses punishable by more than 3 years of imprisonment or a mandatory minimum sentence. Or the offender had been previously detained or subjected to police supervision or sentenced to imprisonment, corrective training, reformative training, or preventative detention. See Amirthalingam (2013), pp. 533–534; Singapore Code Criminal Procedure §337.
- 26.
The paragraph that follows summarizes the ultimate conclusions of three seminal works published almost simultaneously between 1989 and 1991: Braithwaite (1989), Tyler (1990), and Ellickson (1991). Each has spawned a copious corpus of subsequent research. In combination they show that norms accepted by community consensus as legitimate are adhered to without formal law enforcement regardless of their legal status.
- 27.
Haley (1982), pp. 269–273.
- 28.
- 29.
Haley (1982), pp. 269–273.
- 30.
See Ministry of Justice (2013), White Paper on Crime, http://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/en/62/nfm/mokuji.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2016.
- 31.
Id. Table 2-3-2-1, p. 26.
- 32.
Johnson (2002).
- 33.
Rayment (1999), pp. 4–5. Data from survey of 57 of 120 prosecutors in the King County Prosecutors Office, Seattle, Washington, based on a similar survey of Japanese prosecutors by David Johnson in his 1996 University of California dissertation, subsequently published as noted above.).
- 34.
See Haley (1998).
- 35.
Foote (1992).
- 36.
Rayment (1999).
- 37.
Haley (1991), p. 137.
- 38.
Schwartz (2009).
References
Amirthalingam K (2013) Criminal justice and diversionary programmes in Singapore. Crim Law Forum 24:527–559
Baker John S Jr. (2008) Revisiting the explosive growth of federal crimes. Heritage Foundation, Legal Memorandum No. 26, 16 June 2008. http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2008/pdf/lm26.pdf
Braithwaite J (1989) Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
Bressman LS, Rubin EL, Stack KM (2010) The regulatory state. Aspen Publishers, Netherland
Brook T, Bourgon J, Blue G (2008) Death by a thousand cuts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Crime and Society: Singapore. http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/rwinslow/asia_pacific/singapore.html, Accessed 29 Dec 2015.
Ellickson RC (1991) Order without law: how neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Foote DH (1992) Benevolent paternalism of Japanese criminal justice. Calif Law Rev 80:317–390
Haley JO (1982) Sheathing the sword of justice in Japan: an essay on law without sanctions. J Jpn Stud 8:265–281
Haley JO (1989) Confession, repentance and absolution. In: Wright M, Galaway B (eds) Mediation and criminal justice: victims, offenders, and community. Sage, London, pp 195–211
Haley JO (1991) Authority without power: law and the Japanese paradox. Oxford University Press, New York/London
Haley JO (1996) Crime prevention through restorative justice: lessons from Japan. In: Galaway B, Hudson J (eds) Restorative justice: international perspectives. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, pp 349–371
Haley JO (1998) The spirit of Japanese law. University of Georgia Press, Athens
Haley JO (1999) Apology and pardon: learning from Japan. In: Etzioni A (ed) Civic repentance. Rowman Littlefield, Lanham, pp 96–119
Haley JO (2009) Comment on using criminal punishment to serve both victim and social needs. Law Contemp Probl 72:219–226
Haley JO (2011a) Introduction – beyond retribution: an integrated approach to restorative justice. Wash Univ J Law Policy 36:1–16
Haley JO (2011b) Japan. In: Heller KJ, Dubber MD (eds) The handbook of comparative criminal law. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 393–413
Haley John O (1992) Victim-offender mediation: Japanese and American comparisons. In: Messmer H Otto H-U (eds) Restorative justice on trial: pitfalls and potentials of victim-offender mediation—international research perspectives. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 105–130 (Assisted by Ann Marie Neugebauer)
International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief, http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison_population_rate?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All&=Apply. Accessed 29 Dec 2015.
Jiang Y (2011) The mandate of heaven and the great Ming code. University of Washington Press, Seattle
Johnson DT (2002) The Japanese way of justice: prosecuting crime in Japan. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Judicial Caning in Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei, World Corporal Punishment Research. http://www.corpun.com/singfeat.htm. Accessed 29 Dec 2015.
Judicial Council of California (2013) Court statistics report: statewide caseload trends 2002–2003 through 2011–2012. http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/2013-Court-Statistics-Report.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2016.
Knoblock J (1988) Xunzi: a translation and study of his complete works. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Lawrence JC (2014) ASFA in the Age of mass incarceration: go to prison—lose your child? William Mitchell Law Rev 40:990–1008
Lewis ME (2007) The early Chinese empires: “Qin” and “Han”. The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London
Li F (2008) Bureaucracy and the state in early China: governing the western Zhou. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Majone G (1994) The rise of the regulatory state in western Europe. West Eur Polit 17:77–101
Mauer M, King RS, Young MC (2004) The meaning of “life”: long prison sentences in context. The Sentencing Project, Washington, DC
Ministry of Justice (2013) White paper on crime, http://hakusyo1.moj.go.jp/en/62/nfm/mokuji.html. Accessed 4 Jan 2016 (Japan).
Rayment L (1999) A comparative look at prosecutorial objectives. Analytical research paper, University of Washington
Schwartz S (2009) Dreams from the Monster factory: a tale of prison, redemption and one woman’s fight to restore justice to all. Scribner, New York (with David Boodell).
Singapore Police Force, http://www.spf.gov.sg/stats/crimebrief2013.html. Accessed 29 Dec 2015
Singapore Prison Service [SPS] (2012) Stronger community and family support help keep recidivism rates low as SPS maintains focus on its through-CRE philosophy, http://www.sps.gov.sg/sites/default/files/2012%20Prisons%20Annual%20Statistics%20Release%201%20Feb%202012.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2016
Singh J (2000) Crime prevention—the Singapore approach, pp 140–150 (Asia and far east institute or the prevention of crime and the treatment of offenders (UNAFEI), 112th international training course visiting experts papers, resource materials No. 56). http://www.unafei.or.jp/english/pdf/RS_No56/No56_00All.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
Tyler TR (1990) Why people obey the law: procedural justice, legitimacy, and compliance. Yale University Press, New Haven
U.S. Department of State, OSAC Singapore (2013) Crime and safety report. https://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=13850. Accessed 29 Dec 2015
Western B, Pettit B (2010) Collateral costs: incarceration’s effect on economic mobility. Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haley, J.O., Orthwein, W.R. (2016). The Triumph (?) of Western Law: A Contemporary Perspective. In: Lo, Cf., Li, N., Lin, Ty. (eds) Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order. Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1994-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1995-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)