Skip to main content

No Surprise in the ‘Surprise Effect’ of Values Pedagogy: An Edusemiotic Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Edusemiotics – A Handbook

Abstract

Data from the Australian ValuesEducation Program , a series ofschool-based research-on-practice projects that ran through 385 Australian schools from 2003 to 2010, demonstrated enhancedholistic effects in students evaluated acrosswellbeing , maturation andacademics . This oft-termed ‘surprise effect’ represents a challenge to traditionalWestern educational logic that considers learning as resulting principally from cognitive effort and concentration; with affective, social, moral, spiritual andaesthetic concerns being of less importance, if relevant at all. The chaptertraces different theories of knowledge: from logical positivism,to Quine ,to Habermas ,to Damasio. Thedata collected and analysed in the course of the Australian Values Education Program showed that concentration on all developmental measures, while focusing on values of the learningenvironment and discourse, elicited an enhanced learningeffect , including academicdiligence . It is argued in this chapter that theresearch data in valueseducation serve to illustrate that the unhelpful but still dominant Western educational logic is being superseded by new insights inepistemology , neuroscience, andcomplex systems science that paralleledusemiotics as a new theoreticalfoundation for education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apple, M. (2004).Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A. J. (1936).Language, truth and logic. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benninga, J., & Tracz, S. (2010). Continuity and discontinuity in character education. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.),International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing(pp. 521–548). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bita, N. (2014). Christopher Pyne leads back-to-basics drive in early years for numeracy and literacy.The Australian,December 8. Available at:http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/education/christopher-pyne-leads-back-to-basics-drive-in-early-years-for-numeracy-and-literacy/story-fn59nlz9-1227147738093?sv=1d420d5481b0f07edecf6acd34bfdb2f

  • Bloom, B., Engelhardt, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002).Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. (2012).Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1995).Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (2003).Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • deGrasse Tyson, N. (2014).Cosmos: A spacetime odyssey.National Geographic Series. Available at:http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/cosmos-a-spacetime-odyssey/

  • DEEWR. (2008).At the heart of what we do: Values education at the centre of schooling. Report of the values education good practice schools project—Stage 2. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation. Available at:http://www.curriculum.edu.au/values/val_vegps2_final_report,26142.html

  • DEEWR. (2010).Giving voice to the impacts of values education.The final report of the values in action schools project. Melbourne: Education Services Australia. Available at:http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/VASP_FINAL_REPORT_2010.pdf

  • DEST. (2003).Values education study.(Executive summary final report) Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation. Available at:http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/VES_Final_Report14Nov.pdf

  • DEST. (2005).National framework for values education in Australian schools.Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training. Available at:http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/Framework_PDF_version_for_the_web.pdf

  • DEST. (2006).Implementing the national framework for values education in Australian Schools.Report of the values education good practice schools project—Stage 1: Final report, September 2006. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation. Available at:http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/VEGPS1_FINAL_REPORT_081106.pdf

  • Dewey, J. (1916).Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929).The sources of a science of education. New York: Horace Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferre, F. (1982).Language, logic and god. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and human interests. (J. Shapiro, Trans.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1974).Theory and practice.(J. Viertal, Trans.). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984).Theory of communicative action.( Vol. I, T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987).Theory of communicative action.(Vol. II, T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P., & Peters, R. S. (1970).The logic of education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, D. (2015). Why NAPLAN is failing our kids.Literacy educators coalition.Available at:http://www.literacyeducators.com.au/why-naplan-is-failing-our-kids/

  • Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2011). Implications of affective and social neuroscience for educational theory.Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. R. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affect and social neuroscience to education.Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorg, T., Davis, B., & Nickmans, G. (2007). Towards a new complexity science of learning and education.Educational Research Review, 2, 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1964).Critique of pure reason.(N. Kemp Smith, Trans.) London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaymacken, R., & Zengin, M. (2015).Proceedings of the international symposium on values and education, 2012. Istanbul, Turkey: Institute for Values Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An analysis.Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D., Bloom, B., & Masia, B. (1964).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: The affective domain. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. (2008). Towards a new complexity science of learning and education (Invited Response).Educational Research Review, 3, 79–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. (2010). Synergies and balance between values education and quality teaching.Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(4), 489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. (2011). Values education and holistic learning: Updated research perspectives.International Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 148–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. (2012). Values education. In J. Arthur & A. Peterson (Eds.),The Routledge companion to education(pp. 380–388). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. (2013). Values education programs. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.),International guide to student achievement(pp. 279–281). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., & Clement, N. (2008). Quality teaching and values education: Coalescing for effective learning.Journal of Moral Education, 37(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., & Clement, N. (2014). So who has the values? Challenges for faith-based schools in an era of values pedagogy. In J. Chapman, S. McNamara, M. Reiss, & Y. Waghid (Eds.),International handbook of learning, teaching and leading in faith-based schools(pp. 567–582). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., & Fleming, D. (2015). Creativity as central to critical reasoning and the facilitative role of moral education: Evidence from neuroscience.Creative Education, 6(11), 1097–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., & Hawkes, N. (2013). Values education: A pedagogical imperative for student wellbeing.Educational Research International, 2(2), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., & Toomey, R. (Eds.). (2009).Values education and quality teaching: The double helix effect. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Toomey, R., & Clement, N. (Eds.). (2010a).International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Toomey, R., Dally, K., & Clement, N. (2009).Project to test and measure the impact of values education on student and school ambience. Report for the Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) by The University of Newcastle, Australia. Canberra: DEEWR. Available at:http://www.valueseducation.edu.au/values/val_articles,8884.html

  • Lovat, T., Clement, N., Dally, K., & Toomey, R. (2010b). Addressing issues of religious difference through values education: An Islam instance.Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(3), 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Clement, N., Dally, K., & Toomey, R. (2010c). Values education as holistic development for all sectors: Researching for effective pedagogy.Oxford Review of Education, 36(6), 713–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Clement, N., Dally, K., & Toomey, R. (2011a). The impact of values education on school ambience and academic diligence.International Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T., Dally, K., Clement, N., & Toomey, R. (2011b). Values pedagogy and teacher education: Re-conceiving the foundations.Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2010). The emotional foundations of high moral intelligence.New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 129, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2013). Neurobiology and moral mindset. In K. Heinrichs, F. Oser, & T. Lovat (Eds.),Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models, applications(pp. 323–342). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. (2014).Neurobiology and the development of human morality: Evolution, culture, and wisdom. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F.M., & Associates. (1996).Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality(1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014).Programme for international student assessment (PISA): PISA 2012 results.Available at:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm

  • Peters, R. S. (1981).Moral development and moral education. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1953).From a logical point of view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. J. (2004). In good hands? The importance of teacher quality.Educare News, 149, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. (2004).Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2008). Simplifying Complexity: Know Thysel and others.COMPLICITY: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 5(1), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2009). Continuities, discontinuities, interactions: Values, education, and neuroethics.Ethics and Education, 4(1), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2010). Moral stumbling: When ethics recapitulates ontology. In I. Semetsky (Ed.),Semiotics education experience(pp. 53–70). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, A., & Semetsky, I. (2015).Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as educational foundation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1974).Philosophical investigations.(G. Anscombe, Trans.) Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence J. Lovat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lovat, T.J. (2017). No Surprise in the ‘Surprise Effect’ of Values Pedagogy: An Edusemiotic Analysis. In: Semetsky, I. (eds) Edusemiotics – A Handbook. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1493-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1495-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics