Skip to main content

Analysis of Main Parameters that Affect Contact Area Between Mortar Rendering and Substrate: Use of 3D Laser Scanning Technique

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Developments in Building Diagnosis Techniques

Part of the book series: Building Pathology and Rehabilitation ((BUILDING,volume 5))

  • 764 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this research is to analyze the influence of granulometric composition of sand, application energy, and substrates superficial tension on the contact area of rendering mortars. Three different substrates were selected with distinct wetting behaviors: polyethylene, acrylic, and glass. The contact angle of drop water was measured by goniometer. Mortars were prepared with cement:lime:sand ratios of 1:0:3, 1:1:6, and 1:2:9, by content converted in mass, with sand composition of 25 % of each 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 mm grain sizes. Characterization tests in fresh and hardened mortars were performed to provide the technological control of mortars and concretes, as well as the characterization of the different rheological behaviors of the mortars by squeeze-flow and rotational rheometer methods. Mortars were applied to substrates with two different energies, and after curing time were parted from substrates and submitted to scanner 3D digitalization of interfacial area. Results showed that both mortar proportion and substrate superficial tension exercise influence on interfacial contact area development. Additionally, interaction between application energy and substrates superficial tension was significantly influent on contact area. Finally, 3D scanning is a promising new method that shows good performance to measure contact area to improve the understanding of bond strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antunes RPN (2005) Influence of rheology and the impact energy on the adhesive strength of mortar coatings, 187 p. Phd thesis (PhD in Civil Engineering)—Polytechnic School of São Paulo University, São Paulo (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfill PFG (2003) The rheology of fresh cement and concrete—a review. In 11th International congress on cement chemistry, Proceedings. Duban

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer E, Sousa JGG, Guimarães EA, Silva FGS (2007) Study of the laboratory Vane test on mortars. Build Environ 42:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabed B, Kadri E, Azzouz L, Kenai S (2012) Properties of self-compacting mortar made with various types of sand. Cem Concr Compos 34:1167–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Carasek H (1996) Portland cement mortars adherence to porous substrates: assessing of the influence factors and contribution to the study of the linkage mechanism, 285 p. Thesis (Doctoral)—Polytechnic School of São Paulo University, São Paulo (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis WR, Brough R (1972) Ultrasonic techniques in ceramic research and testing. Ultrasonics 10(3):118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deltombe R, Kubiak KJ, Bigerelle M (2014) How to select the most relevant 3D roughness parameters of a surface. Scanning 36:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas S, Freitas VP, Barreira E (2014) Detection of façade plaster detachments using infrared thermography—a nondestructive technique. Constr Build Mater 70:80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall C (1977) Water movement in porous building materials-I. Unsatured flow theory and its applications. Build Environ 12:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall C, Yau MHR (1987) Water movement in porous building materials—IX. The water absorption and sorptivity of concretes. Build Environ 22:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hola J, Sadowski L, Reiner J, Stach S (2015) Usefulness of 3D surface roughness parameters for nondestructive evaluation of pull-off adhesion of concrete layers. Constr Build Mater 84:111–120 1 June 2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashani, A, Nicolas RS, Qiao GG, Van Deventer JSJ, Provis JL (2014) Modelling the yield stress of ternary cement–slag–fly ash pastes based on particle size distribution. Powder Technol 266:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Kylili A, Fokaides PA, Christou P, Kalogirou SA (2014) Infrared thermography (IRT) applications for building diagnostics: a review. Appl Energy 134:531–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Kim HJ, Sakai E, Daimon M (2003) Effect of particle size distribution of fly ash–cement system on the fluidity of cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 33(5):763–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logins A, Torims T (2015) The Influence of high-speed milling strategies on 3d surface roughness parameters. In: 25th DAAAM international symposium on intelligent manufacturing and automation. vol 100, pp 1253–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendes TM (2008) Influence of the aggregate friction coefficient and the matrix viscosity in the rheological behavior of concentrated heterogeneous suspensions, 122 p. Master (Master in Civil Engineering)—Polytechnic School of São Paulo University, São Paulo (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhero SM, Ferreira JMF (2004) Influence of particle size distribution on rheology and particle packing of silica-based suspensions. Powder Technol 139:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Paes INL (2004) Evaluation of the mortar coatings water transport in the initial post-application times, 265 p. Phd thesis (PhD in Civil Engineering)—Brasília University, Brasília (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagnussat D (2013) Effect of production burning temperature of ceramic blocks and its influence in the tensile bond strength of mortar renderings under ceramic block walls. 2013. Thesis (Doctoral)—Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretto MEJ (2007) Influence of the rugosity produced by concrete substrate treatment in adherence of mortar coverings, 180 p. Thesis (Master)—Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos NMM, Simões ML, Delgado JMPQ, de Freitas VP (2012) Reliability of the pull-off test in situ evaluation of adhesion strength. Constr Build Mater 31:86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos PMD, Júlio ENBS, Silva VD (2007) Correlation between concrete-to-concrete bond strength and the roughness of the substrate surface. Constr Build Mater 21(8):1688–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senff L, Barbetta PA, Repette WL, Hotza D, Paiva H, Ferreira VM, Labrincha JA (2009) Mortar composition defined according to the rheometer and flow table tests using factorial designed experiments. Constr Build Mater 23:3107–3111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz CM (2011) Interaction between mortar rheological parameters and surface potential contact area on mortar renderings bond strength, 212 p. Thesis (Master)—Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (In Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz CM, Masuero AB (2015) Analysis of main parameters affecting substrate/mortar contact area through tridimensional laser scanner. J Colloid Interface Sci 455:16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugo HO, Page AW, Lawrence SJ (2001) The development of mortar/unit bond. In: Canadian masonry symposium, 9th, fredericton. Proceedings of department of civil engineering—University of New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan KS, Chan KC, Wong BS, Guan LW (1996) Ultrasonic evaluation of cement adhesion in wall tiles. Cement Concr Compos 18(2):119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates M, Martin-Luengo MA, Cornejo J, González V (1994) The importance of the porosity of mortars, tiles and bricks in relation to their bonding strengths. Stud Surf Sci Catal 87:781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahia T, Roussel N, Lanos C (2005) The squeezing test: a tool to identify firm cement-based material’s rheological behaviour and evaluate their extrusion ability. Cem Concr Res 35(10):1891–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Han J (2000) The effect of ultra-fine admixture on the rheological property of cement paste. Cem Concr Res 30(5):827–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support of CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico—Brazilian Council of Technological Development) and CAPES (Fundação Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazilian Ministry of Education).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Mariane Stolz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stolz, C.M., Borges Masuero, A. (2016). Analysis of Main Parameters that Affect Contact Area Between Mortar Rendering and Substrate: Use of 3D Laser Scanning Technique. In: Delgado, J. (eds) Recent Developments in Building Diagnosis Techniques. Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0466-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0466-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0465-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0466-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics