Skip to main content

Study of the Occupant Characteristics During Evacuation in Medium- and High-Rise Buildings in Indonesia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Fire Science and Technology 2015

Abstract

One way to avoid the loss of life in building fires is by performing effective evacuation. As a consequence of economic developments, cities of the world continuously build high-rise buildings, including super high-rise ones having more than 40 storeys. When a building has to perform full evacuation, the long travel distance in a super high-rise building can cause delay to reach exit discharge locations on the ground floor. Although a number of studies have been carried out to identify the characteristics of evacuee during emergency, it is suggested that the evacuation behaviour may be affected by cultural background of the persons (Özkaya A 2001) [1]. This paper is intended to gather building evacuation time, vertical movement speed data and to study the behaviour of occupants during evacuation in medium- and high-rise buildings. The study was carried out mostly in Jakarta, Indonesia. The evacuation time and overall movement speed were observed by gathering the data during a typical evacuation drill in the medium- and high-rise buildings. The result suggested that vertical movement speed descending from the fourth floor is around 0.70–0.81 m/s. As the evacuee is descending from the higher floors, the lower movement speed was identified, e.g. around 0.62–0.75 m/s for those descending from the ninth floor and around 0.50–0.73 m/s for those descending from 19th floor. The trends are in good agreement with other works suggested in the literature. From the surveys, regardless of the occupancy, i.e. whether the building is an office, a college or shopping avenue, interesting behaviours of the evacuee during evacuation process were identified. While travelling downwards, evacuees tend to evacuate in groups, to walk side by side with other members of the groups, and some of them hold the stairs’ railing. These caused queuing and congestion, especially if the exit stairs’ width only fit two people walking side by side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Özkaya A (2001) A qualitative approach to children of developing countries from human behaviour in fire aspect, human behaviour in fire. Proceedings of the second international symposium, Interscience Communications, London, pp 531–538, pp 533–534

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sujatmiko W, Dipojono HK, Soelami FXN, Soegijanto (2014) Performance-based fire safety evacuation in high-rise building flats in Indonesia – a case study in Bandung. Procedia Environ Sci 20:116–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma J, Song WG, Tian W, Lo SM, Liao GX (2012) Experimental study on an ultra high-rise building evacuation in China. Saf Sci 50:1665–1674, p. 1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The Society of Fire Protection Engineers (2002) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 3–367

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kobes M, Helsloot I, de Vries B, Post JG, Oberije’ N, Groenewegen K (2010) Way finding during fire evacuation; an analysis of unannounced fire drills in a hotel at night. Build Environ 45:537–548

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeon G-Y, Kim J-Y, Hong W-H, Augenbroe G (2011) Evacuation performance of individuals in different visibility conditions. Build Environ 46:1094–1103

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koo J, Kim YS, Kim B-I, Christensen KM (2013) A comparative study of evacuation strategies for people with disabilities in high-rise building evacuation, Expert Sys Appl 40(2013):408–417

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shaobo L, Lizhong Y, Tingyong F, Jian L (2009) Evacuation from a classroom considering the occupant density around exits. Physica A 388(2009):1921–1928

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagai R, Fukamachi M, Nagatani T (2006) Evacuation of crawlers and walkers from corridor through an exit. Physica A 367:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu M, Zheng X, Cheng Y (2011) Determining the effective distance of emergency evacuation signs. Fire Saf J 46:364–369

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tanimoto J, Hagishima A, Tanaka Y (2010) Study of bottleneck effect at an emergency evacuation exit using cellular automata model, mean field approximation analysis, and game theory. Physica A 389:5611–5618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank GA, Dorso CO (2011) Room evacuation in the presence of an obstacle. Physica A 390:2135–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guyl ne Proulx (1995) Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings. Fire Saf J 24:229–246

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cote’ R, Harrington GE (2006) Life safety code handbooks. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kady RA, Davis J (2008) The effect of occupant characteristics on crawling speed in evacuation. Fire Saf J 44(2009):451–457

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuligowski E, Peacock R, Wiess E, Hoskins B (2013) Stair evacuation of older adults and people with mobility impairments. Fire Saf J 62:230–237

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spearpoint M, MacLennan HA (2012) The effect of an ageing and less fit population on the ability of people to egress buildings. Saf Sci 50:1675–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu X, Song W (2009) Staircase evacuation modeling and its comparison with an egress drill. Build Environ 44:1039–1046

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fang Z, Song W, Zhang J, Wu H (2010) Experiment and modeling of exit-selecting behaviors during a building evacuation. Physica A 389:815–824

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shields TJ, Boyce KE (2000) A study of evacuation from large retail stores. Fire Saf J 35:25–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. The Society of Fire Protection Engineers (2002) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 3–346

    Google Scholar 

  22. The Society of Fire Protection Engineers (2002) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, pp 3–363

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koo J, Kim B-I, Kim YS (2014) Estimating the effects of mental disorientation and physical fatigue in a semi-panic evacuation. Expert Systems Appl 41(2014):2379–2390, p. 2383

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Pemerintah DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, and Dinas Penanggulangan Kebakaran dan Penyelamatan for providing scholarships as well as their support during the data collection and discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yulianto Sulistyo Nugroho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leonita, F., Sakti, H., Nugroho, Y.S. (2017). Study of the Occupant Characteristics During Evacuation in Medium- and High-Rise Buildings in Indonesia. In: Harada, K., Matsuyama, K., Himoto, K., Nakamura, Y., Wakatsuki, K. (eds) Fire Science and Technology 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0376-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0376-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0375-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0376-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics