Skip to main content

We Have Always Been Robots: The History of Robots and Art

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robots and Art

Part of the book series: Cognitive Science and Technology ((CSAT))

Abstract

Although the “robot” is a twentieth century concept, machines that conform to the same definition—are capable of carrying out complex actions automatically—are part of a much longer history. This chapter will provide an overview of this history. It will trace the contemporary emergence of the robot back to the appearance of clockwork and mechanical automata in the early modern period. In so doing, the chapter will make two key contributions to this book’s study of robots and art. Firstly, it will argue that the concept of a robot predates the emergence of the word robot by several centuries, and that our understanding of the contemporary concept is enriched by recognition of this longer history. Secondly, it will show that, from its very inception, the history of robots has been closely entwined with that of art—evident not least in the fact the term itself derives from the context of theatre. This history continues to be reflexively present in contemporary performance.

Tara Heffernan—Independent Scholar

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this respect, the “Musical Lady” and the other eighteenth-century automata discussed below are different from those mass-produced in the nineteenth century, which were commonly simple mechanical figures positioned on top of a hidden a music box. While the figure would make the motions of playing an instrument, it was the mechanism below which produced the actual music. The famous automata of eighteenth century were unique in that the figures played instruments themselves.

  2. 2.

    See, for instance, Gaby Wood’s Edison’s Eve: The Quest for Mechanical Life [30] or Simon Schaffer’s “Babbage’s Intelligence: Calculating Engines and the Factory System” [22].

  3. 3.

    This automaton is now known to have been a hoax: while the “Chess Players” movement of the pieces was genuinely mechanical, and extraordinarily complex in its range of possibilities, the moves were determined by a human chess player, hidden inside the mechanism.

  4. 4.

    The Musée des arts et métiers in Paris also has a number of eighteenth-century automata in its Théâtre des automates, including another Musical Lady made for Marie-Antoinette. This is no longer functional, however.

  5. 5.

    Kathryn Hoffman notes that mechanical figures of breathing sleeping women were popular fairground exhibits throughout the nineteenth century [7, pp. 139–159].

  6. 6.

    Indeed, the narrative of R.U.R recounts the growing resistance of the robots to their treatment by humans, until they rise to overthrow their oppressors, saving only one man whose responsibility will be the manufacture of new robots. In the process of annihilating the human race, however, the technological knowledge for the construction of robots is lost.

  7. 7.

    Kinetic art is art that utilizes perceivable motion as either a component of or central feature in, the artwork. Emerging in the 1950s and 1960s, kinetic art revolutionized sculpture, freeing it “from static form and reintroduced the machine at the heart of the artistic debate” [10, p. 170]. An early example of kinetic art is George Rickey’s “Four Squares in a Square” (1972). This work involved four aluminium squares, each just over a meter squared, suspended on a steel pole nearly 7 m above the ground. Depending on the force of the wind, the would squares rotate, or flip from side to side, returning to create a flat surface when the wind was low [28, p. 277].

  8. 8.

    Associated with the Dada movement, anti-art describes art (or ideas) that work in opposition to established aesthetic or conceptual norms, often employing objects or images from non-traditional sources and bringing them into gallery contexts in order to critique the values held by audiences and institutions [8].

  9. 9.

    Cybernetic art describes artwork by practitioners that employ the premises of the field of cybernetics; the research of operating systems and communications in both machines and living things [29], to create works that interact (in varying degrees) with their environments. Often using complex sets of sensors, cybernetic art was seldom described as interactive. Rather, artists tended toward describing their works as responsive, or reactive [24].

  10. 10.

    Robot Wars is a popular British television program that ran from 1998–2003. The series documented battles between the radio-controlled robotic creations of professional and amateur engineers [36].

  11. 11.

    Telerobots are remotely-controlled robots. First conceived in the 1940s to handle radioactive materials, telerobots have historically been employed to perform tasks in inhospitable environments such as under the sea, or in space. However, with the growing accessibility of the Internet and technology in the twenty-first century, telerobotics are now used in a variety of fields, from education to arts and entertainment [25, p. 260].

References

  1. Bar-Cohen Y, Marom A, Hanson D (2009) The coming robot revolution: expectations and fears about emerging intelligent, humanlike machines. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley P, Come D (2002) Creative evolutionary systems. Morgan Kauffmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlyle T (1829) A mechanical age. In: Edinburg review. Avaliable via History 104 Europe. http://www.indiana.edu/~hist104/sources/Carlyle.html. Accessed 16 December 2014

  4. Carver G, Beardon C (2005) New visions in performance. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ficher-Rathus L (2010) Foundations of art and design: enhanced media addition. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodall J (2005) The will to evolve. In: Smith M (ed) (2007) Stelarc, the monograph. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman K (2006) Sleeping beauties in the fairground: the Sptizner, Pedley and Chemisé exhibits. Early Popular Visual Culture 4(2):139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Humble P (2002) Anti-art and the concept of art. In: Smith P, Wilde C (eds) A companion to art theory. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 244–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kac E (1997) Origin and development of robotic art. Art J 56(3):60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kac E (2005) Telepresence and bio art: networking humans, rabbits and robots. University of Michigan Press, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kittler F (1999) Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kleiner F (2012) Gardeners art through the ages: a global history. Wadsworth, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lizchaka C, Sick A (2007) Machines as agency: artistic perspectives. Transcript Verlag, Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marx K, Engels F (2008) The communist manifesto. Pluto, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller A (2014) Colliding worlds: how cutting edge science is redefining contemporary art. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peri J (2009) New art city: manhattan at mid-century. Vintage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reichardt J (1972) Art at large. New scientist magazine 54(794):292

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riedler J (2009) Karel capek. In: Bould M, Butler A, Roberts A, Vint S (eds) Fifty key figures in science fiction. Routledge, London, pp 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  19. Riskin J (2003) The defecating duck: or, the ambiguous origins of artificial life. Crit Inquiry 29(4):599–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Salter C (2010) Entangled: technology and the transformation of performance. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Satz A, Woods J (2009) Articulate objects: voice, sculpture and performance. Peter Lang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffer S (1994) Babbage’s Intelligence: calculating engines and the factory system. Crit Inquiry 21(1):203–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sillars L (ed) (2009) Joyous Machines: Michael Landy and Jean Tinguely. Tate Publishing, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sommerer C, Mignonneau L (eds) (2008) The art and science of interface and interaction design, vol 1. Springer Science and Business Media, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Song D, Goldberg K, Chong Y (2008) Networked telerobots. In: Siciliano B, Khatib O (eds) Springer handbook of robotics. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, pp 759–769

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Stelarc (2009) Mécaniques du corps. In: Hall G, Stelarc, Roland D, Zylinska J (eds) Enghien-les-Bains, Centre des Arts

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stephens E (2015) ‘Dead eyes open’: the role of experiments in galvanic reanimation in nineteenth-century popular culture. Leonardo 48(2) http://www.leonardo.info/leoinfo.html. Accessed 16 March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  28. Warkentin J (2010) Creating memory: a guide to outdoor public sculpture in toronto. Becker Associates, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wiener N (1965) Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wood G (2007) Edison’s eve: a magical history of the quest for mechanical life. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zivanovic A, Davis S (2011) Elegant motion: the senster and other cybernetic sculptures by edward ihnatowicz. Kybernetes 40:47–62

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Zylinska J (2002) The future … is monstrous: prosthetics as ethics. In: Zylinska J (ed) The cyborg experiments: the extensions of the body in the media age. Continuum, London, pp 214–36

    Google Scholar 

Online References

  1. Hysterical Machines (2004) http://billvorn.concordia.ca/robography/Hysterical.html. Accessed 29 June 2004

  2. Norm the artist, the Oughtist, the Ner’er-do-well (1998) http://www.normill.ca/artpage.html. Accessed 27 June 2014

  3. Rinaldo K (2004) www.kenrinaldo.com. Accessed 28 June 2014

  4. Robot Wars History (n.d.) http://www.robotwars.tv/history. Accessed 25 June 2014

  5. The Helpless Robot (2011) http://www.year01.com/archive/helpless/. Accessed 28 June 2014

  6. The Telegarden (2011) www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~goldberg/garden/Ars/. Accessed 29 June 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Stephens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stephens, E., Heffernan, T. (2016). We Have Always Been Robots: The History of Robots and Art. In: Herath, D., Kroos, C., Stelarc (eds) Robots and Art. Cognitive Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0321-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0321-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0319-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0321-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics