Skip to main content

Rational of Participatory Approaches for the Management of Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security

Abstract

For timely and successful diffusion of any agro-technique to the farming communities, the participatory approach is one of the options. In participatory approach, the researchers can reach to number of farmers for diffusion of agricultural technology with in a period of time. Now participatory approaches are becoming the integral part of the researchers for diffusion of any technology. For conservation and sustainable utilisation of PGR and TK, participatory approaches play a significant role. The genetic diversity of crop species can be enhanced by conserving the PGR and TK through formal institutions and the farming communities. In developing countries, farmers are the main elements in the conservation of PGR and production of agricultural crops. The women also play a major role in the selection of plant species, their preservation and sustainable utilisation. Although women are not involved in policymaking and to take decisions, they play a main role identification of crop genetic resources for household uses and their conservation. Through participatory approaches, farmers are encouraged to take part in the selection of new varieties by using their own experiences. They can interact with the researchers freely while selecting the suitable crop genetic resources. Both participatory varietal selection and participatory plant-breeding approaches encourage the farming communities for active involvement in the selection of new genotypes from the developed and the segregating genetic materials. The farmers select the genetic material for conservation and use depending upon their need and to secure the food security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson HC (1992) Gender planning methodology: three papers on incorporating the gender approach in development cooperation programmes. Rapporteur Och Notiser 109. Institution for Kuffurgeografi och ekonomik geografi unid lund Universitet

    Google Scholar 

  • Anil Kumar N, Arivudai Nambi V, Mampoothiri KUK, Geetha Rani M, King EDIO (2010) MSSRF – biodiversity programme: hindsight and forethought. Chennai, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhag Mal B, Padulosi S, Bala Ravi S (2010) Minor millets in South Asia: learnings from IFAD-NUS project in India and Nepal. Bioversity International, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Boef W, de J, Hardon, Louwaars NP (1997) Integrated organisation of institutional crop development as a system to maintain and stimulate the utilisation of agro-biodiversity at the farm level. Paper presented at the International meeting Managing Plant Genetic Resources in the African Savannah, Bamako Mali

    Google Scholar 

  • CIAT (1997) New frontiers in participatory research and gender analysis. CGIAR systemwide program on participatory research and gender analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation. CIAT, Cali

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson DL (1985) Harvest security and intraspecific diversity in traditional tropical agriculture. Econ Bot 39:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyzaguirre P, Iwanaga M (1996) Farmers’ contribution to maintaining genetic diversity in crops, and its role within the total genetic resources system. In: Eyzaguirre P, Iwanaga M (eds) Participatory plant breeding. IPGRI, Rome, pp 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyzaguirre PB, Raymond R (1995) Rural women: a key to the conservation and sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity. Fourth World Conference on Women- Focus Day on Rural Women. FAO, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2012) Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of Food and Agriculture. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0800e/a0800e.pdf

  • Horne PM, Stur WW (2003) Developing agricultural solutions with smallholder farmers-how to get started with participatory approaches. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). ACIAR Monograph 99, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  • IDRC (1998) Guidelines for integrating gender analysis into biodiversity research. Sustainable use of biodiversity program initiative. IDRC, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Iriarte Lucio, Litza Lazarte, Javier Franco y David Fernández (1999) El Rol del Genero en la Conservación, Localización, y Manejo de la Diversidad Genética de Papa, Tarwi y Maiz. Gender and Genetic Resources Management. IPGRI, FAO, BIOSOMA, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis D, Hodgkin T, Eyzaguirre P, Ayad G, Sthapit B.R, Guarino L (1998) Farmer selection, natural selection and crop genetic diversity: the need for a basic dataset. In: Jarvis D, Hodgkin T (eds) Strengthening the scientific basis of in situ conservation of agricultural biodiversity on-farm. Options for data collecting and analysis. Proceedings of a workshop to develop tools and procedures for in situ conservation on-farm, Rome, Italy, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • King E, Nambi VA, Nagarajan L (2009) Integrated approaches in small millets conservation: a case from Kolli Hills, India. In: Jaenike H, Ganry J, Hoeschle-Zeledon I, Kahane R (eds) Proceeding of the International Symposium on underutilized plant species for food, nutrition, income and sustainable development. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), Arusha, pp 79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Long N, Long A (1992) Battlefields of knowledge: the interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire S, Manicad G, Sperling L (1999) Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding – do from a perspective of farmer plant breeding. A global analysis of issues and current experience. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation. CIAT, Cali

    Google Scholar 

  • Naming M, Yu RA, Tu CL (2010) Traditional knowledge conservation and transmission of agrobiodiversity: sharing of experiences by the Penan community in Mulu Sarawak. In: Mirfat AHS, Salma I, Mohd Rani MY, Mohd Norowi H, Mohd Shukri MA, Erny Sabrina MN, Noor Sarinah MN, Siti Noor Aishikin AH, Nor Asiah I (eds) Second National Conference on Agrobiodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, Agrobiodiversity for Sustainable Economic Development. Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Malaysia, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  • Prain G, Hagmann J (2000) Farmers’ management of diversity in local systems. In: Almekinders CJM, de Boef WS (eds) Encouraging diversity. The synthesis between crop conservation and development. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, pp 94–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Quek P, Zhang Z (1997) Documenting indigenous knowledge: the need for an IK journal. IPGRI-APO Newsletter 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Quek P, Manurung R, Naming M, Kimonyi JM, Dai L, Abraham M, Eyzaguirre P, Morimoto Y, Maundu P, Zhang Z (2009) The traditional knowledge journal (TKJ) methodology empowers communities to document their traditional knowledge. Knowledge share fair for agricultural development and food security. Bioversity International, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha PK (1998) Gender and generation: role of traditional seed supply systems in the maintenance of agrobiodiversity in Nepal. In: Partap T, Sthapit B (eds) Managing agrobiodiversity: farmers’ changing perspectives and institutional responses in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan region. ICIMOD, IPGRI, Kathmandu, pp 143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling L, Loevinsohn M (1996) Using diversity: enhancing and maintaining genetic resources on-farm. Proceedings of a workshop held on 19–21 June 1995, New Delhi, India. IDRC, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit BR, Joshi KD, Witcombe JR (1996) Farmer participatory cultivar improvement: a case of high altitude rice from Nepal. Exp Agri 32:479–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit BR, Shrestha PK, Upadhyay MP (2006) Good practices: on-farm management of agricultural biodiversity in Nepal. NARC, LI-BIRD, IPGRI and IDRC, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit BR, Subedi A, Shrestha P, Shrestha PK, Upadhyay MP (2008) Practices supporting community management of farmers’ varieties. In: Thijssen MH, Bishaw Z, Beshir A, de Boef WS (eds) Farmer’s varieties and seeds. Supporting informal seed supply in Ethiopia. Wageningen International, Wageningen, pp 166–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan MS (2000) Government-Industry-Civil Society: partnerships in integrated gene management. Volvo Environ Ambio 29(2):115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia Mario E, De la Torre A (1998) Women farmers and Andean seeds. Gender and genetic resources management. IPGRI/FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Teshome A (1996) Factors maintaining Sorghum Landrace Diversity in north Shewa and south Welo regions of Ethiopia. PhD thesis. Ottawa-Carleton Institute of Biology, Biology Department, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Teshome A, Baum B, Fahrig L, Torrance JK, Arnason JT, Lambert JD (1997) Sorghum landrace variation and classification in north Shewa and south Ethiopia. Euphytica 97:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teshome A, Arnason JT, Torrance JK, Lambert JD, Fahrig L, Baum B (1999a) Traditional farmers’ knowledge of sorghum landrace storability in Ethiopia. Econ Bot 53(1):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teshome A, Fahrig L, Torrance JK, Arnason TJ, Lambert JD, Baum B (1999b) Maintenance of sorghum landrace diversity by farmers’ selection in Ethiopia. Econ Bot 53(1):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff NT, Cohen JM, Goldsmith AA (1979) Feasibility and application of rural development participation: a state-of-the-art-paper. Cornell University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UPWARD (1996) Into action research, partnerships in Asian rootcrop research and development. UPWARDS, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • van Veldhuizen L, Waters-Bayer A, Ramirez R, Johnson DA, Thompson J (1997) Farmers’ research in practice, ILEIA Readings in Sustainable Agriculture. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde V, Vainio-Mattila A (1995) Gender analysis and forestry: international training package. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Joshi KD, Sthapit BR (1996) Farmer participatory cultivar improvement. I: varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Exp Agri 32:445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharat Bhushan Gupta Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, B.B., Salgotra, R.K. (2015). Rational of Participatory Approaches for the Management of Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge. In: Salgotra, R., Gupta, B. (eds) Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0060-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics