Skip to main content

Dialogic Objects

Material Knowledge as a Challenge to Educational Practice

  • Chapter
Object Medleys

Part of the book series: New Research – New Voices ((NRNV))

Abstract

Objects speak with many voices. They can call up stories that can resonate across generations and end up in the corners of kitchens, to be resurrected as a dish of cooking or a place mat. Objects frame memories and also keep them alive (Hurdley, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantam physics and the entanglement of matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (2007). Practice as research. Chippenham: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D., & Clinton, K. (2002). The limits of the local: Expanding perspectives of literacy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(3), 337–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. (2004). Material thinking. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coessens, K., Crispin, D., & Douglas, A. (2009). The artistic turn: A manifesto. Ghent: Orpheus Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, R. (2015). Where is language? An anthropologist’s questions on language, literature and performance. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1976). Education, the practice of freedom. London: Writers and Readers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identities [Studies in Narrative 8]. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Pahl, K., & Pool, S. (2015). Visual digital methodologies with children and young people: Perspectives from the field. In E. Stirling & D. Yamada-Rice (Eds.), Visual methods with children and young people: Academics and visual industries in dialogue (pp. 164–185). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M., & Hillier, Y. (2006). The changing face of adult literacy, language and numeracy: A critical history. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A., Davies, C., Aumann, K., Wenger, E., Aranda, K., Heaver, B., & Wolff, D. (2013). Mobilising knowledge in community–university partnerships: What does a community of practice approach contribute? Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 8(3), 278–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurdley, R. (2013). Home, materiality, memory and belonging: Keeping culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (Ed.). (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Towards an understanding of voice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, G. H. (2005). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in contemporary art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, C. R., Gutshall Rucker, T., & Kirchhofer, J. M. (2015). ‘Go Be a Writer!’: Intra-activity with materials, time and space in literacy learning. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 394–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M., & Grosvenor, I. (2005). Materialities of schooling design, technology, objects, routines. London: Symposium.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, M. (2016). Literacy as material engagement: The abstract, tangible and mundane ingredients of childhood reading. Literacy, 50(3), 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masny, D. (2012). Multiple literacies theory: Discourse, sensation, resonance and becoming. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33(1), 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (Ed.). (2001). Home possessions: Material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg. Miller, D. (2008). The comfort of things. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K. (2002). Ephemera, mess and miscellaneous piles: Texts and practices in families. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 2(2), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K. (2004). Narratives, artifacts and cultural identities: An ethnographic study of communicative practices in homes. Linguistics and Education, 15(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K. (2006). An inventory of traces: Children’s photographs of their toys in three London homes. Visual Communication, 5(1), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K. (2014). Materializing literacies in communities: The ‘uses of literacy’ revisited. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Khan, A. (2015). Artifacts of resilience: Enduring narratives, texts, practices across three generations. In J. Sefton-Green & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Learning and literacy over time: Longitudinal perspectives (pp. 116–133). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Pollard, A. (2010). The case of the disappearing object: Narratives and artefacts in homes and a museum exhibition from Pakistani heritage families in South Yorkshire. Museum and Society, 8(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandlin, J., Malley, M., & Burdick, J. (2011). Mapping the complexity of public pedagogy scholarship: 1894–2010. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 338–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, P. (2003). The Olifantsvlei Fresh Stories Project: Multimodality, creativity and fixing in the semiotic chain. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 123–139). London: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., & Yang, W. (Eds.). (2014). Youth resistance research and theories of change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pahl, K. (2017). Dialogic Objects. In: Pillay, D., Pithouse-Morgan, K., Naicker, I. (eds) Object Medleys. New Research – New Voices. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-194-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-194-0_3

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-194-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics