Abstract
In this chapter I explore how entanglements with objects of the everyday can serve a productive function in educational research. The writings of Sherry Turkle and Sarah Nuttall serve as useful anchors for this exploration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akesson, B., D’Amico, M., Denov, M., Khan, F., Linds, W., & Mitchell, C. A. (2014). “Stepping back” as researchers: Addressing ethics in arts-based approaches to working with war-affected children in school and community settings. Educational Research for Social Change (ERSC), 3(1), 75–89.
Brown, B. (1998). How to do things with things (A Toy Story). Critical Inquiry, 24(4), 935–964.
Brown, B. (Ed.). (2004). Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brown, B. (2015). The secret life of things (Virgina Woolf). In B. Brown (Ed.), Other things (pp. 49–78). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Buckingham, D., & Willett, R. (2009). Video cultures: Media technology and everyday creativity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Candlin, F., & Guins, R. (Eds.). (2009). The object reader. London: Routledge.
Daston, L. (2004). Things that talk. In L. Daston (Ed.), Things that talk: Object lessons from art and science (pp. 7–8). New York, NY: Zone Books.
Department of Education. (2009). National minimum uniform norms and standards for school infrastructure. Retrieved from http://www.sacplan.org.za/documents/NationalMinimumNormsandStandardsforSchoolInfrastructureDepartmentofEducation.pdf
Hodder, I. (2012). Entangled: An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Labacher, L. (2016). The evolution of the cellphone as camera. In K. MacEntee, C. Burkholder, & J. Schwab (Eds.), What is a cellphilm? Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory artsbased research and activism (pp. 171–181). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lindsay, C. (2003). From the shadows: Users as designers, producers, marketers, distributors, and technical support. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology (pp. 29–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Miller, D. (1998). Material cultures: Why some things matter. London: UCL Press.
Miller, D. (2010). Stuff. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mitchell, C. (2004). Just who do we think we are? Memory work and self study with beginning teachers.
In R. Balfour, T. Buthelezi, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Teacher development at the centre of change (pp. 45–54). Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. London: Sage Publishers.
Mitchell, C. (2015). Looking at showing: On the politics and pedagogy of exhibiting in community based research and work with policy makers. Educational Research for Social Change, 4(2), 48–60. Retrieved from http://ersc.nmmu.ac.za/articles/Vol_4_No_2_Mitchell_pp_48-60_October_2015.pdf
Mitchell, C., & Reid-Walsh, J. (2002). Researching children’s popular culture: The cultural spaces of childhood. London: Routledge.
Mitchell, C., & Smith, A. (2001). Changing the picture: Youth, gender and HIV/AIDS prevention campaigns in South Africa. Canadian Women’s Studies Journal, 21(2), 56–62.
Mitchell, C., & Weber, S. (1999). Reinventing ourselves as teachers: Beyond nostalgia. London: Falmer Press.
Mitchell, C., Chege, F., Maina, L., & Rothman, M. (2016). Beyond engagement in working with children in eight Nairobi slums to address safety, security, and housing: Digital tools for policy and community dialogue. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 11(5–6), 651–665.
Mitchell, C., DeMartini, A., & Muthuri, S. (2016). Through the eyes of mothers: Using photovoice to explore challenges confronting women in balancing work and childcare (Policy brief). Montreal: GRoW. Retrieved from https://participatorycultureslab.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/koro-policybrief_mitchell_april-26.pdf
Nuttall, S. (2009). Entanglement: Literary and cultural reflections on post-apartheid. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
Riggins, S. (1994). Fieldwork in the living room: An autoethnographic essay. In S. H. Riggins (Ed.), The socialness of things: Essays on the socio-semiotics of objects (pp. 101–147). Berlin: Moutin de Gruyter.
Segal, L., van den Berg, C., & Madikida, C. (2006). Mapping memory: Former prisoners tell their stories. Johannesburg: David Krut.
Spence, J., & Solomon, J. (Eds.). (1995). What can a woman do with a camera? Photography for women. London: Scarlet Press.
Stallabrass, J. (2009). Trash. In F. Candlin & R. Guins (Eds.), The object reader (pp. 406–424). London: Routledge.
Stuart, J. (2007). From our frames (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.
Turkle, S. (2007). Evocative objects: Things we think with. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Urquart, J. (2016). A number of things: Stories of Canada through fifty objects. Toronto: Harper Collins.
Warner, M. (2004). Introduction. In M. Haworth-Booth (Ed.), Things: A spectrum of photography, 1850–2001 (pp. 1–4). London: Jonathan Cape.
Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). That’s funny you don’t look like a teacher: Interrogating images of identity in popular culture. London: Falmer Press.
Wood, E., & Latham, K. F. (2014). The objects of experience: Transforming visitor-object encounters in museums. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, C. (2017). Object as Subject. In: Pillay, D., Pithouse-Morgan, K., Naicker, I. (eds) Object Medleys. New Research – New Voices. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-194-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-194-0_2
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-194-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)