Skip to main content

The Role of Technology on Preparing Students with Language-Based Learning Differences for Transition to Public High Schools

  • Chapter
Transitioning Children with Disabilities

Part of the book series: Studies in Inclusive Education ((STUIE))

  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

Though the post-secondary transition process for Students with Disabilities is a major concern in the United States, preparation for this transition from K-12 schooling to college and career starts takes place during the transition from K-8 to 9-12 grades (Balfanz, 2009; Akos & Galassi, 2004; Phelan, Yu, & Davidson, 1994). In this tone, one of the main concerns for students with language-based learning differences who attend specialized private K-8 schools is the ability to transition to general education public high schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akos, P., & Galassi, J. (2004). Middle and high school transitions as viewed by students, parents, and teachers. Professional School Counseling, 7(4), 212–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfanz, R. (2009). Putting middle grades students on the graduation path: A policy and practice brief. Baltimore, MD: Everyone Graduates Center, Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E., & Sabornie, E. (1986). Effective instruction with microcomputers: Promises, practices, and preliminary feelings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(4), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, G., & Koury, K. (1996). Empirical advances in technology-assisted instruction for students with mild and moderate disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 526–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, M. (2012). The technology coordinator’s handbook (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: ISTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M., & Deshler, D. (2010). Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning disabilities: Research we have, research we need. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knighton, L. (2013). Teacher knowledge of assistive technology for inclusive classrooms. Retrieved from ProQuest LLC (Accession Number UMI 3596172).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, B. (2001). Technology and teacher education in special education: Disaster or deliverance? Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(2), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermid, R. (1989). A quantitative analysis of the literature on computer-assisted instruction with the learning disabled and educably mentally retarded (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. (2006). A comparison of written composition assessment using standard format versus alternate format among college-bound students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (Accession Number UMI 3254207).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parette, H., Crowley, E., & Wojcik, B. (2007). Reducing overload in students with learning and behavioral disorders: The role of assistive technology. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 4(1), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, P., Yu, H. C., & Davidson, A. L. (1994). Navigating the psychosocial pressures of adolescence: The voices and experiences of high school youth. American Education Research Journal, 31(2), 415–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puckett, K., Judge, S., & Brozo, W. (2009). Integrating content area literacy and assistive technology: A teacher development institute. Southeastern Teacher Education Journal, 2(2), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratliff, C., & Anderson, S. (2011). Reviving the Turtle: Exploring the use of logo with students with mild disabilities. Computers in the Schools, 28, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, J., & Slowinski, J. (2004). K-12 technology coordinators: Expectations and realities. In M. Simonson & M. Crawford (Eds.), Conference Proceedings for the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (27th, Chicago, 8, pp. 719–726). Retrieved from EBSCO host. (Accession Number: ED485035).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiah, R., Mastropieri, M., & Scruggs, T. (1995). Computer-assisted instruction and students with learning disabilities: Does research support the rhetoric? In M. Mastropieri & T. Scruggs (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 162–192). New York, NY: JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, B., Shepherd, C., & Range, B. (2013). Implications for educational leaders as they consider technology development. Planning and Changing, 44(1/2), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar, W., & Holloman, H. (2009). Technology leaders wanted: Acknowledging the leadership role of a technology coordinator. TechTrends, 53(6), 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Technology in schools: Suggestions, tools, and guidelines for assessing technology in elementary and secondary education (NCES 2003–313, Prepared by T. Ogle, M. Branch, B. Canada, O. Christmas, J. Clement, J. Fillion, E. Goddard, N. B. Loudat, T. Purwin, A. Rogers, C. Schmitt, & M. Vinson). The Technology in Schools Task Force, National Forum on Education Statistics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J., & Reith, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed., Applied Social Research Methods Series). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, B. (2017). The Role of Technology on Preparing Students with Language-Based Learning Differences for Transition to Public High Schools. In: Ellis, A.L. (eds) Transitioning Children with Disabilities. Studies in Inclusive Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-134-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-134-6_6

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-134-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics