Abstract
Though the post-secondary transition process for Students with Disabilities is a major concern in the United States, preparation for this transition from K-12 schooling to college and career starts takes place during the transition from K-8 to 9-12 grades (Balfanz, 2009; Akos & Galassi, 2004; Phelan, Yu, & Davidson, 1994). In this tone, one of the main concerns for students with language-based learning differences who attend specialized private K-8 schools is the ability to transition to general education public high schools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akos, P., & Galassi, J. (2004). Middle and high school transitions as viewed by students, parents, and teachers. Professional School Counseling, 7(4), 212–221.
Balfanz, R. (2009). Putting middle grades students on the graduation path: A policy and practice brief. Baltimore, MD: Everyone Graduates Center, Johns Hopkins University.
Ellis, E., & Sabornie, E. (1986). Effective instruction with microcomputers: Promises, practices, and preliminary feelings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(4), 1–16.
Fitzgerald, G., & Koury, K. (1996). Empirical advances in technology-assisted instruction for students with mild and moderate disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 526–553.
Frazier, M. (2012). The technology coordinator’s handbook (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: ISTE.
Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kennedy, M., & Deshler, D. (2010). Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning disabilities: Research we have, research we need. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 289–298.
Knighton, L. (2013). Teacher knowledge of assistive technology for inclusive classrooms. Retrieved from ProQuest LLC (Accession Number UMI 3596172).
Ludlow, B. (2001). Technology and teacher education in special education: Disaster or deliverance? Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(2), 143–163.
McDermid, R. (1989). A quantitative analysis of the literature on computer-assisted instruction with the learning disabled and educably mentally retarded (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Morris, M. (2006). A comparison of written composition assessment using standard format versus alternate format among college-bound students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (Accession Number UMI 3254207).
Parette, H., Crowley, E., & Wojcik, B. (2007). Reducing overload in students with learning and behavioral disorders: The role of assistive technology. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 4(1), 2–12.
Phelan, P., Yu, H. C., & Davidson, A. L. (1994). Navigating the psychosocial pressures of adolescence: The voices and experiences of high school youth. American Education Research Journal, 31(2), 415–447.
Puckett, K., Judge, S., & Brozo, W. (2009). Integrating content area literacy and assistive technology: A teacher development institute. Southeastern Teacher Education Journal, 2(2), 27–38.
Ratliff, C., & Anderson, S. (2011). Reviving the Turtle: Exploring the use of logo with students with mild disabilities. Computers in the Schools, 28, 241–255.
Reinhart, J., & Slowinski, J. (2004). K-12 technology coordinators: Expectations and realities. In M. Simonson & M. Crawford (Eds.), Conference Proceedings for the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (27th, Chicago, 8, pp. 719–726). Retrieved from EBSCO host. (Accession Number: ED485035).
Shiah, R., Mastropieri, M., & Scruggs, T. (1995). Computer-assisted instruction and students with learning disabilities: Does research support the rhetoric? In M. Mastropieri & T. Scruggs (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 162–192). New York, NY: JAI Press
Sorensen, B., Shepherd, C., & Range, B. (2013). Implications for educational leaders as they consider technology development. Planning and Changing, 44(1/2), 73–86.
Sugar, W., & Holloman, H. (2009). Technology leaders wanted: Acknowledging the leadership role of a technology coordinator. TechTrends, 53(6), 66–75.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Technology in schools: Suggestions, tools, and guidelines for assessing technology in elementary and secondary education (NCES 2003–313, Prepared by T. Ogle, M. Branch, B. Canada, O. Christmas, J. Clement, J. Fillion, E. Goddard, N. B. Loudat, T. Purwin, A. Rogers, C. Schmitt, & M. Vinson). The Technology in Schools Task Force, National Forum on Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
Woodward, J., & Reith, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 503–536.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed., Applied Social Research Methods Series). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walker, B. (2017). The Role of Technology on Preparing Students with Language-Based Learning Differences for Transition to Public High Schools. In: Ellis, A.L. (eds) Transitioning Children with Disabilities. Studies in Inclusive Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-134-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-134-6_6
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-134-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)