Abstract
Non-State armed groups exert extensive influence on populations around the world. However, international law does not effectively regulate the relationship between armed groups and populations subject to their authority or influence and so much of this interaction occurs in a legal vacuum. This chapter proposes international human rights law as a solution. The application of international human rights law obligations to armed groups is increasingly accepted, but the precise content of the resultant obligations is unclear. Significantly, the development of the law in this regard presents a unique opportunity to actively engage armed groups, and to encourage their compliance with human rights law, and international law more broadly. It is suggested that if the practice of armed groups and their motivations are incorporated into the development of human rights obligations, then the resultant obligations can be used not only to regulate armed group activity but also to guide it. Human rights law can be used to demonstrate to armed groups how they can govern in the best interests of the affected population—thereby promoting human rights protection—and why it is in their interest that they do so—thereby promoting compliance. This chapter examines armed groups’ practice, motivations, and ideology and discusses armed group governance activities related to the administration of justice and service provision in order to illustrate how the proposed approach could proceed. Although the focus is on international human rights law, where international humanitarian law is applicable it must also inform the development of any obligations.
Daragh Murray is a Lecturer in International Human Rights Law at the School of Law & Human Rights Centre, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom. Email: d.murray@essex.ac.uk. Phone: 00(44)1 206 872661.
Notes
- 1.
For the purposes of this chapter, non-State armed groups are those armed groups that (a) exist independently of the State and (b) are sufficiently organised to impose internal discipline.
- 2.
Hoffmann 2015, pp. 165–66; Buchanan E (2015) Battle for control of the DRC: Who are the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR)? http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/battle-control-drc-who-are-democratic-forces-liberation-rwanda-fdlr-1526271. Accessed 30 April 2017; Mampilly 2015, pp. 65–67.
- 3.
Nebehay S (2015) Islamic State-controlled parts of Syria, Iraq largely out of reach: Red Cross. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-icrc-idUSKBN0M921N20150313. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 4.
UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) 2013, p. 24; Bangerter 2012, p. 51; TamilNet (2003) Thamil Eelam judiciary said a basis for rebuilding northeast. http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=79&artid=10277. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 5.
The law of armed conflict is also referred to as international humanitarian law (IHL).
- 6.
- 7.
PCIJ, Customs Regime between Germany and Austria (Protocol of March 19th, 1931), Advisory Opinion, 5 September 1931, PCIJ Rep Series A/B, No. 41, Individual Opinion of Judge Anzilotti, 5 September 1931, p. 57.
- 8.
Relevant in this regard are prohibitions of “arbitrary” treatment, limitations built in to certain rights, and derogation regimes.
- 9.
It is noted that law of armed conflict provisions relating to detention, trial, humane treatment, and humanitarian assistance are of particular relevance to the issues discussed herein.
- 10.
See, generally, Murray 2016.
- 11.
Although the extent, or content, of these obligations typically remains unspecified. See, generally, Clapham 2014.
- 12.
At least not initially, certain advanced armed groups may be subject to obligations broadly equivalent to those of States, although the issue of sovereignty will remain a distinguishing factor.
- 13.
See Sect. 5.2.
- 14.
Sassòli 2010, p. 21.
- 15.
Bangerter 2011b, p. 8.
- 16.
UN Security Council 2009, para 41.
- 17.
International Committee of the Red Cross 2008, p. 13.
- 18.
See Murray 2016, pp. 195–197.
- 19.
This issue is discussed further in Murray 2016, pp. 170–171.
- 20.
Similarly, the law of armed conflict only applies to armed groups that have satisfied certain organisational requirements in situations of “sustained and concerted violence”. This threshold of intensity denotes the limitation of State authority.
- 21.
See, ECtHR, Ilascu and Others v Moldova and Russia, Grand Chamber Judgment, 8 July 2004, Application No. 48787/99 (Ilascu), para 313.
- 22.
Mampilly 2011, p. 114.
- 23.
Murray 2016, Chapter 5(III).
- 24.
Ibid., pp. 181–183.
- 25.
The ability to exert control over group members is a requirement for international legal personality.
- 26.
See, for example, Article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949.
- 27.
This obligation requires the authority to directly provide for the fulfilment of a right, “when individuals or a group are unable, for reasons beyond their control, to realize that right themselves by the means at their disposal”. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2000, para 37.
- 28.
This obligation requires “positive measures to assist individuals and communities to enjoy the right” in question. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2002, para 25 (emphasis added).
- 29.
This obligation requires the provision of, inter alia, appropriate education with respect to the right in question. Ibid.
- 30.
Armed groups do, however, engage in direct service provision in accordance with the obligation to provide. For instance, the LTTE provided primary health care in areas under their control in Sri Lanka. Stokke 2006, p. 1031.
- 31.
For instance, in Senegal “state health teams, accompanied by ICRC staff, vaccinated people in areas controlled by armed groups”: International Committee of the Red Cross 2015, p. 107. In Syria, the State and armed groups have negotiated humanitarian access in certain situations: BBC News (2014) Syria crisis: Evacuation operation in Homs begins. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-26078328. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 32.
For instance, in certain SPLM controlled areas of Southern Sudan, the armed group facilitated the provision of education by allowing Jesuit Relief Services to establish and operate the education system. Mampilly 2011, pp. 160–161.
- 33.
Murray 2016, p. 195.
- 34.
Ibid., p. 197.
- 35.
See, for example, Ilascu, above n 21, para 313.
- 36.
- 37.
Solomon E (2015) The Isis economy: Meet the new boss. https://www.ft.com/content/b2c6b5ca-9427-11e4-82c7-00144feabdc0. Accessed 26 April 2017.
- 38.
Arjona et al. 2015, p. 1.
- 39.
Mampilly 2015, p. 48.
- 40.
- 41.
International Crisis Group 2013, p. 21.
- 42.
Roggio B (2013) Al Nusrah Front poised to take over last major city on Euphrates River. http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2013/03/al_nusrah_front_pois.php. Accessed 30 April 2017.
- 43.
Caris and Reynolds 2014, pp. 15–17 and 19.
- 44.
Stokke 2006, p. 1028.
- 45.
Ibid.
- 46.
International Crisis Group 2008, p. 7.
- 47.
Kalyvas 2015, pp. 126–127.
- 48.
Human Rights Watch 2007b, p. 5.
- 49.
Watson I, Razek R (2013) Rebel court fills void amid Syrian civil war. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/25/world/meast/syria-rebel-court/index.html. Accessed 21 April 2017.
- 50.
International Crisis Group 2008, p. 20; Roy A (2010) Walking with the comrades. http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/walking-with-the-comrades/264738. Accessed 21 April 2017.
- 51.
Sivakumaran 2009, p. 493.
- 52.
UN General Assembly 2008, para 32.
- 53.
Kuol 1997, p. 12.
- 54.
Human Rights Watch 2001, p. 10 and 22.
- 55.
International Crisis Group 2006a, p. 20.
- 56.
See Human Rights Watch 2012, p. 133.
- 57.
Caris and Reynolds 2014, pp. 18–19.
- 58.
Weiss and Hassan 2015, p. 224 and 228.
- 59.
Weiss and Hassan 2015, pp. 227–228.
- 60.
Sivakumaran 2009, p. 494.
- 61.
- 62.
International Crisis Group 2011, p. 17.
- 63.
Babak Q (2010) Afghanistan: Taliban justice “fairer” than state’s. http://www.infosud.org/Afghanistan-Taliban-justice-fairer,8710. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 64.
See generally Arjona et al. 2015.
- 65.
Pool 2001, p. 100.
- 66.
Shah 2013, p. 489.
- 67.
Al Jazeera English (2011) Colombia rebel army brings healthcare to the jungle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hxkoiZVJRQ. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 68.
Cunningham E (2014) Islamic State imposes a reign of fear in Iraqi hospitals. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/islamic-state-imposes-a-reign-of-fear-in-iraqi-hospitals/2014/11/25/94476f3e-6382-11e4-ab86-46000e1d0035_story.html?utm_term=.f6d6eb24a6c7. Accessed 21 April 2017; Caris and Reynolds 2014, p. 22.
- 69.
Kindt 2009, p. 132.
- 70.
Somer 2015, pp. 17–18.
- 71.
Ibid.
- 72.
Cambanis T (2013) Hizbollah Mahdi schools mix math with doctrine. https://www.ft.com/content/e0be1122-2695-11e3-9dc0-00144feab7de. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 73.
Khaja N (2014) Afghanistan Conflict: Life inside a Taliban stronghold. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-29658839. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 74.
Förster 2015, p. 208.
- 75.
Bangerter 2011a, p. 11.
- 76.
International Crisis Group 2006b, p. 22.
- 77.
“In recent months, the Taliban opened a northern front in Kunduz, Baghlan and Badakshan provinces, with a strong contingent of al-Qaeda foreigners among them, according to senior Afghan officials. In all these areas, a new saying prevails: ‘Government courts for the rich (because the judges are bribable), Taliban justice for the poor.’ And Taliban justice, they say, is usually more swift and fair.” McGirk T (2009) Behind the Taliban's Resurgence in Afghanistan. http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1923303,00.html. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 78.
International Crisis Group 2006a, p. 20.
- 79.
Barrett 2014, p. 43.
- 80.
Solomon 2015, above n 37.
- 81.
Ibid.
- 82.
- 83.
Daragahi B (2016) Syria’s Al-Qaeda Branch Now Wants To Rule Like ISIS. https://www.buzzfeed.com/borzoudaragahi/syrias-al-qaeda-branch-now-wants-to-rule-like-isis?utm_term=.klM6lxVJK#.tmWNdn3JW. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 84.
- 85.
See generally Bangerter 2011a. These issues are discussed further below.
- 86.
Weinstein 2007, p. 163.
- 87.
Arjona et al. 2015, p. 3.
- 88.
Hoffmann 2015, p. 185.
- 89.
Coggins 2015, p. 113.
- 90.
SCSL, Prosecutor v Sesay, Kallon and Gbao, Judgment, 2 March 2009, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T, para 707.
- 91.
It is not suggested that all of these groups adhered to the phases of revolution developed by Mao.
- 92.
Tse-tung 1989, p. 44.
- 93.
Quoted in Shah 2013, p. 488.
- 94.
Stetler 1970, p. 98.
- 95.
Ibid., p. 103. In relation to the experiences of the NRA in Uganda, see also Weinstein 2007, p. 175.
- 96.
For a compilation of relevant practice see http://www.theirwords.org run by Geneva Call.
- 97.
Tse-tung 1989, p. 92.
- 98.
Bangerter 2012, p. 70.
- 99.
Quoted in Human Rights Watch 1998.
- 100.
Guevara 2007, p. 61.
- 101.
Bangerter 2012, p. 95. From the same document, see similarly: ELN/FARC principle 1, “our daily behaviour, and the purpose underlying our activities, should be borne in the people’s interests”; KLA “Improper behaviour with respect to the civilian population is to be prevented in all KLA units”; EGP Guatemala, “I will respect our people, their property, and their customs”.
- 102.
Guevara 2007, p. 67.
- 103.
Bangerter 2011a, p. 6.
- 104.
Ibid., p. 7.
- 105.
Ibid., p. 9.
- 106.
Ibid., p. 8.
- 107.
Mampilly 2015, p. 48.
- 108.
As demonstrated, for example, by the derogation clauses in treaties such as the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the limitations built into certain rights, such as the rights to freedom of expression or freedom of assembly.
- 109.
- 110.
- 111.
An example in this regard is the importance attributed to the Islamic State’s equal application of the law to both affected individuals and the group’s own members. See the comment of Ghazwan Abdul Rahman in Mahmood M (2015) Life in Mosul one year on: “ISIS with all its brutality is more honest than the Shia government”. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/10/mosul-residents-one-year-on-isis-brutality. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 112.
Weinstein 2007, p. 171.
- 113.
See above, Sect. 5.4.
- 114.
TamilNet, above n 4. See further, Stokke 2006, p. 1027.
- 115.
Human Rights Committee 1999, para 13.
- 116.
Human Rights Committee, Albert Womah Mukong v Cameroon, Views, 21 July 1994, Communication No. 458/19 91, UN Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/458/1991, para 9.8.
- 117.
IACtHR, Castillo Petruzzi et al. v Peru, Judgment, 20 May 1999, Series C No. 59, para 121.
- 118.
ECtHR, Sunday Times v the United Kingdom, Judgment, 16 April 1979, Application No. 6538/74, para 49.
- 119.
Ibid.
- 120.
Human Rights Watch 2012, p. 3.
- 121.
National Transitional Council/ Free Libyan Army 2011.
- 122.
See above Sect. 5.3.1.
- 123.
- 124.
“Somaliland” in Geneva Call 2010, p. 30.
- 125.
See Murray 2016, pp. 240–247.
- 126.
Cockburn P (2015) Isis, a year of the caliphate: Day-to-day life in the “Islamic State”—where any breach of restrictive, divinely inspired rules is savagely punished. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-a-year-of-the-caliphate-day-to-day-life-in-the-islamic-state-where-any-breach-of-restrictive-10348151.html. Accessed 21 April 2017.
- 127.
See Murray 2016, Chapter 8(I).
- 128.
This is discussed in Sect. 5.6.2.1.
- 129.
This is discussed in Sect. 5.6.2.2.
- 130.
In relation to the social justice underpinning, see Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1999a, para 4.
- 131.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2009, para 2.
- 132.
Ibid., para 7.
- 133.
See generally, ibid.
- 134.
See, for example, BBC News (2016) Islamic State committing genocide against Yazidis, says UN. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-36547467. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 135.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2000, para 12.
- 136.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1999a, para 13.
- 137.
Ibid., para 8.
- 138.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2000, para 12(d).
- 139.
Ibid., para 43.
- 140.
See, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1999b, para 57.
- 141.
Situations in which obligations cannot be satisfied on the basis of the armed group’s resources alone are discussed in the next section.
- 142.
These issues are discussed further below in Sect. 5.6.2.2.
- 143.
Khaja N (2014) Afghanistan Conflict: Life inside a Taliban stronghold. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-29658839. Accessed 10 April 2017.
- 144.
For example, Jesuit Relief Services assisted the SPLA in the establishment of an education system in southern Sudan. The establishment of parallel services is not ideal, however, given the additional resource constraints imposed.
- 145.
See, for example, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2000, para 63.
- 146.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1990, para 10.
- 147.
Murray 2016, pp. 193–194.
- 148.
This is the case, for example, in Syria, Israel, and Libya today.
- 149.
See generally Magone et al. 2011.
- 150.
Neuman 2011, p. 85.
- 151.
Crombé 2011, p. 57.
- 152.
Ibid., 2011 p. 62.
- 153.
Coggins 2015, p. 113.
- 154.
Suykens 2015, p. 152.
- 155.
Mampilly 2011, p. 114.
References
Articles, Books and Other Documents
Arjona A, Kasfir N, Mampilly Z (2015) Introduction. In: Arjona A, Kasfir N, Mampilly Z (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–20
Bangerter O (2011a) Reasons why armed groups choose to respect international humanitarian law or not. International Review of the Red Cross 93(882):353–384
Bangerter O (2011b) Talking to Armed Groups. Forced Migration Review 37:7–9
Bangerter O (2012) Internal Control: Codes of Conduct within Insurgent Armed Groups – Small Arms Survey Occasional Paper No. 31. Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Barrett R (2014) The Islamic State. http://soufangroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/TSG-The-Islamic-State-Nov14.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
Caris CC, Reynolds S (2014) ISIS Governance in Syria, Middle East Security Report 22. Institute for the Study of War, http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/ISIS_Governance.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
Clapham A (2014) Focusing on Armed Non-State Actors. In: Clapham A, Gaeta P (eds) The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 766–810
Coggins BL (2015) Rebel Diplomacy: Theorizing Violent Non-State Actors’ Strategic Use of Talk. In: Arjona A, Kasfir N, Mampilly Z (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 98–118
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1990) General Comment 3: The nature of States parties obligations, UN Doc. E/1991/23
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1999a) General Comment 12: The right to adequate food, UN Doc. E/C.12/1999/5
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1999b) General Comment 13: The right to education, UN Doc. E/C.12/1999/10
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2000) General Comment 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health, UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2002) General Comment 15: The right to water, UN Doc. E/C.12/2002/11
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2009) General Comment 20: Non-Discrimination in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/20
Crombé X (2011) Afghanistan: Regaining Leverage. In: Magone C, Neuman M, Weissman F (eds) Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience. Hurst & Company, London, pp 49–68
Förster T (2015) Dialogue Direct: Rebel Governance and Civil Order in Northern Côte d’Ivoire. In: Arjona A, Kasfir N, Mampilly Z (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 203–225
Geneva Call (2010) In Their Words: Perspectives of Armed Non-State Actors on the Protection of Children from the Effects of Armed Conflict. https://www.genevacall.org/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2014/01/2010_GC_CANSA_InTheirWords. Accessed 10 April 2017
Guevara EC (2007) Guerrilla Warfare. BN Publishing, Thousand Oaks
Hoffmann K (2015) Myths Set in Motion: The Moral Economy of Mai Mai Governance. In: Arjona A, Kasfir N, Mampilly Z (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 158–179
Human Rights Committee (1999) General Comment 27: Freedom of Movement, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.9
Human Rights Committee (2014) General Comment 35: Liberty and security of person, UN Doc. CCPR/C/GC/35
Human Rights Watch (1998) War Without Quarter: Colombia and International Humanitarian Law. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports98/colombia/. Accessed 10 April 2017
Human Rights Watch (2001) Indonesia: The War in Aceh. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/aceh/indacheh0801.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
Human Rights Watch (2007a) Central African Republic, State of Anarchy: Rebellion and Abuses Against Civilians. https://www.hrw.org/report/2007/09/14/state-anarchy/rebellion-and-abuses-against-civilians/. Accessed 10 April 2017
Human Rights Watch (2007b) No One is Safe: Insurgent Attacks on Civilians in Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2007/thailand0807/. Accessed 10 April 2017
Human Rights Watch (2012) Syria: End Opposition Use of Torture, Executions. https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/09/17/syria-end-opposition-use-torture-executions. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Committee of the Red Cross (2008) Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/topic/file_plus_list/0923-increasing_respect_for_international_humanitarian_law_in_non-international_armed_conflicts.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Committee of the Red Cross (2015) Annual Report 2014. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ICRC-annual-report-2014. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Criminal Court, The Office of the Prosecutor (2012) Report on Preliminary Examination Activities. http://iccforum.com/media/background/africa/2012-11-22_ICC_OTP_Report_on_Preliminary_Examination_Activities.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Criminal Court, The Office of the Prosecutor (2013) Report on Preliminary Examination Activities. https://www.icc-cpi.int/OTP%20Reports/otp-report-2013.aspx. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Crisis Group (2006a) Iraq’s Muqtada Al-Sadr: Spoiler or Stabiliser? https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/55-iraq-s-muqtada-al-sadr-spoiler-or-stabiliser.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Crisis Group (2006b) Pakistan’s Tribal Areas: Appeasing the Militants. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/125-pakistan-s-tribal-areas-appeasing-the-militants.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Crisis Group (2008) Iraq’s Civil War, the Sadrists and the Surge. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/72-iraq-s-civil-war-the-sadrists-and-the-surge.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Crisis Group (2011) The Insurgency in Afghanistan’s Heartland. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/207-the-insurgency-in-afghanistan-s-heartland.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
International Crisis Group (2013) Syria’s Kurds: A Struggle Within a Struggle. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/syrias-kurds-a-struggle-within-a-struggle.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
Kalyvas SN (2015) Rebel Governance During the Greek Civil War, 1942–1949. In: Arjona A, Kasfir N, Mampilly Z (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 119–137
Kindt MT (2009) Hezbollah: A State within a State. In: Kindt M, Post J, Schneider B (eds) The World’s Most Threatening Terrorist Networks and Criminal Gangs. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 123–144
Kuol MA (1997) Administration of Justice in the (SPLA/M) Liberated Areas: Court Cases in War-Torn Southern Sudan. Refugee Studies Programme, University of Oxford, Oxford
Magone C, Neuman M, Weissman F (eds) (2011) Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience. Hurst & Company, London
Mampilly Z (2011) Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Mampilly Z (2015) Insurgent Governance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In: Krieger H (ed) Inducing Compliance with International Humanitarian Law: Lessons from the African Great Lakes Region. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 56–67
Murray A (2015) Wilson held power over life and death of IRA volunteers if they transgressed. http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/wilson-held-power-over-life-and-death-of-ira-volunteers-if-they-transgressed-31067402.html. Accessed 19 September 2017
Murray D (2016) Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed Groups. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland
National Transitional Council/ Free Libyan Army (2011) Procedure on detaining or capturing people, Frontline Manual. http://www.ejiltalk.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Final-Libyan-LOAC-Guidelines-17-May-2011.ppt. Accessed 10 April 2017
Neuman M (2011) Somalia: Everything is Open to Negotiation. In: Magone C, Neuman M, Weissman F (eds) Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience. Hurst & Company, London, pp 77–94
Pool D (2001) From Guerrillas to Government: The Eritrean People’s Liberation Front. Ohio University Press, Athens OH
Sassòli M (2010) Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law. International Humanitarian Legal Studies 1:5–51
Shah A (2013) The intimacy of insurgency: beyond coercion, greed or grievance in Maoist India. Economy and Society 42(3):480–506
Sivakumaran S (2009) Courts of Armed Opposition Groups: Fair Trials or Summary Justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice 7:489–513
Solomon E (2015) The Isis economy: Meet the new boss. https://www.ft.com/content/b2c6b5ca-9427-11e4-82c7-00144feabdc0. Accessed 19 September 2017
Somer J (2015) Education and Armed Non-State Actors: Towards a comprehensive agenda. Background Paper for the PEIC/Geneva Call Workshop, 23–25 June 2015, Geneva. http://www.protectingeducation.org/sites/default/files/documents/background_paper_for_the_peic_geneva_call_workshop.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2017
Stetler R (ed) (1970) The Military Art of People’s War: Selected Writings of General Vo Nguyen Giap. Monthly Review Press, New York and London
Stokke K (2006) Building the Tamil Eelam State: Emerging state institutions and forms of governance in LTTE-controlled areas in Sri Lanka. Third World Quarterly 27(6):1021–1040
Suykens B (2015) Comparing Rebel Rule Through Revolution and Naturalization: Ideologies of Governance in Naxalite and Naga India. In: Arjona A, Kasfir N, Mampilly Z (eds) Rebel Governance in Civil War. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 138–157
Toolis K (1991) Informer: The Life and Death of an I.R.A. Man. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/03/magazine/informer-the-life-and-death-of-an-ira-man.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed 19 September 2017
Tse-tung M (1989) Mao Tse-tung on Guerrilla Warfare. U.S. Marine Corps, Washington D.C.
UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) (2013) Afghanistan Annual Report 2012: Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. http://www.refworld.org/docid/512b26a92.html. Accessed 10 April 2017
UN General Assembly (2008) Human Rights Council: Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Philip Alston. Addendum – Mission to Philippines, UN Doc. A/HRC/8/3/Add.2
UN Security Council (2009) Report of the Secretary-General on the protection of civilians in armed conflict, UN Doc. S/2009/277
Weinstein JM (2007) Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence. Cambridge University Press, New York
Weiss M, Hassan H (2015) ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror. Regan Arts, New York
Case Law
ECtHR, Ilascu and Others v Moldova and Russia, Grand Chamber Judgment, 8 July 2004, Application No. 48787/99
ECtHR, Sunday Times v the United Kingdom, Judgment, 16 April 1979, Application No. 6538/74
Human Rights Committee, Albert Womah Mukong v Cameroon, Views, 21 July 1994, Communication No. 458/19 91, UN Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/458/1991
IACtHR, Castillo Petruzzi et al v Peru, Judgment, 20 May 1999, Series C. No. 59
PCIJ, Customs Regime between Germany and Austria (Protocol of March 19th, 1931), Advisory Opinion, 5 September 1931, PCIJ Rep Series A/B, No. 41, Individual Opinion of Judge Anzilotti
SCSL, Prosecutor v Sesay, Kallon and Gbao, Judgment, 2 March 2009, Case No. SCSL-04-15-T
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murray, D. (2018). Engaging Armed Groups Through the Development of Human Rights Obligations: Incorporating Practice, Motivation and Ideology to Promote Compliance with International Law. In: Gill, T., McCormack, T., Geiß, R., Krieger, H., Paulussen, C. (eds) Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law Volume 19, 2016. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, vol 19. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-213-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-213-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague
Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-212-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-213-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)