Skip to main content

Trafficking in Hazardous Wastes (Article 28L) and Illicit Exploitation of Natural Resources (Article 28Lbis)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The African Criminal Court

Part of the book series: International Criminal Justice Series ((ICJS,volume 10))

Abstract

Pollution committed on a vast scale has been a problem for Africa for a long time. Frequently, it was European states which used Africa as their “trash bin”. The chapter gives an overview of the international instruments that tackle this issue, and shows that, so far, the task of criminalizing serious acts of pollution has been left to the domestic legislator. Then, Article 28L and Article 28Lbis of the Malabo Protocol (Annex) will be analyzed. Under these provisions, trafficking in hazardous wastes and illicit exploitation of natural resources, which have a devastating effect on the environment and the economy in Africa, are directly criminalized. The author welcomes this as a contribution to the development of international law in principle. However, in his view, the crimes in the Annex to the Malabo Protocol have some problematic features, in particular insofar as they lead to a too far-reaching criminalization. He argues that criminalization should rather take place at the domestic level and not at the international level.

All internet sources in this chapter were last visited on 30 June 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Radkau 2000, pp. 306–313.

  2. 2.

    For details see Werle and Jeßberger 2014, marg. numbers 1323 et seq.

  3. 3.

    Arnold 2007, Article 8 para 60.

  4. 4.

    For example, Asada 2000, p. 403, 418.

  5. 5.

    See Reichart 1999, pp. 526–568; Tomuschat 2001, pp. 105–124.

  6. 6.

    For details see Heger 2009, pp. 55 et seq.

  7. 7.

    On the situation before the harmonization in the EU Member States, see Faure and Heine 2000, p. 9 et seq. and Criminal Penalties in EU Member States’ Environmental Law, Maastricht, 2002 (www.eurocbc.org/Environmental_crime_survey_final_report.pdf).

  8. 8.

    European Treaty Series (ETS) No. 172.

  9. 9.

    OJ C 019, 23/01/1992, pp. 01–15.

  10. 10.

    OJ C 039, 11/02/2000, pp. 04–07.

  11. 11.

    OJ 180 E, 26/06/2001, pp. 238–243.

  12. 12.

    OJ L 029, 05/02/2003, pp. 55–58; see Faure 2004, pp. 18–29.

  13. 13.

    Commission v. Council, Case C-176/03, ECR [2005] I-07879.

  14. 14.

    OJ L 328 06/12/2008, pp. 28–37.

  15. 15.

    For the example of Germany, see Heger 2012, pp. 211–223.

  16. 16.

    Section § 326: “§ 1 Whosoever unlawfully, outside a facility authorized therefor or in substantial deviation from the proscribed or authorized procedure, collects, ships, treats, utilizes, stores, dumps, discharges, disposes of or trades in, brokers or otherwise commercializes waste which

    1. 1.

      contains or can generate poisons or carriers of diseases which are dangerous to the public and are communicable to persons or animals;

    2. 2.

      is carcinogenic in humans, has harmful reproductive effects or can cause alterations in the genetic make-up;

    3. 3.

      is prone to explode, spontaneously combustible, or of more than merely minor radioactive quality; or

    4. 4.

      because of its nature, composition or quantity is capable of:

      1. (a)

        polluting or otherwise negatively and permanently altering a body of water, the air or the soil or

      2. (b)

        endangering an existing population of animals or plants

        shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a fine.

        § 2 Whosoever ships into, out of or through the Federal Republic of Germany,

    1. 1.

      waste in significant amounts as defined by Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (OJ L 190, 12.7.2006,1, L 318, 28.11.2008, 15), last amended by Regulation (EU) No 135/2012 (OJ L 46, 17.11.2012, 30), provided it is a case of illegal shipment under Article 2 No 35 of Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006, or

    2. 2.

      other waste contrary to a prohibition or without the required permit within the meaning of subsection (1) above,

      shall incur the same penalty.”

  17. 17.

    Friedrich Schiller, Wallenstein, Die Piccolomini: “Der Krieg ernährt den Krieg. Gehen Bauern drauf, Ei, so gewinnt der Kaiser mehr Soldaten”.

  18. 18.

    Münkler 2002, pp. 48–57.

  19. 19.

    Broomhall 2004, p. 163, 166.

  20. 20.

    See wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bamako_Convention; 1/6/2016).

  21. 21.

    http://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/2015/270315_conflict_minerals_en.htm: The International Task Force on Illegal Exploitation of and Trade in Natural Resources in the Great Lakes Region (ITF)—originally launched by the EU in 2009—concludes inter alia:

    “1.1.1 What are the main conclusions of the conference?

    More than armed groups, criminal networks are now involved in illegal exploitation and trade in natural resources in the Great Lakes and their reach is regional and international. After years of weakened state authority in the eastern DRC, insurgency is predominantly economically motivated.

    • According to some estimates, illicit natural resources exploitation in eastern DRC is worth USD 1.25 billion per year. There is no definitive assessment of how much of this sum reaches transnational organized criminal groups, but it is certainly in the order of hundreds of millions of dollars.  Armed groups probably see only a small percentage of the profits.

    • Organized crime financing is very complex, considering exploitation of gold, timber, charcoal, tin, tungsten and tantalum as well as local taxation schemes and wildlife.

    • Response must include actions against impunity, improved governance, reforming security forces, managing natural resources and promoting livelihood programmes.

    • Continued support for the ICGLR "Regional Certification Mechanism" is justified—but needs more attention to strengthening coordination and building trust from business.

    • The ITF should continue to steer stronger diplomatic engagement: by gathering those active in fighting illegal exploitation and trade in the region, the Task Force is a valuable platform to maximize efforts and avoid overlapping initiatives.”

  22. 22.

    See the chapter by Meloni in this book.

References

  • Arnold R (2007) In: Triffterer O (ed), Commentary on the Rome Statute, 2nd edn. Nomos, Baden-Baden, Article 8 para 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Asada K (2000) Entstehung und Entwicklung des Umweltstrafrechts in Japan. In: Leipold (ed) Umweltschutz und Recht in Deutschland und Japan. C.F. Müller, Heidelberg, pp 403–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Broomhall B (2004) The values, policies and goals of ICL in the age of globalization: Report. In: Association Internationale de Droit Penal (ed): International Criminal Law: Quo Vadis? Éditions érès, Ramonville Saint-Agne, pp 163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Faure MG (2004) European environmental criminal law: do we really need it? Eur Environm Law Rev 13:18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Faure MG, Heine G (2000) Environmental criminal law in the European Union, documentation of the main provisions with introductions. Edition iuscrim, Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Heger M (2009) Die Europäisierung des deutschen Umweltstrafrechts. Mohr/Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Heger M (2012) Das 45. Strafrechtsänderungsgesetz – Ein erstes europäisches Gesetz zur Bekämpfung der Umweltkriminalität. Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung in Strafsachen (HRRS) 13:211–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Münkler H (2002) Die neuen Kriege. Rowohlt, Reinbek

    Google Scholar 

  • Radkau J (2000) Natur und Macht. Eine Weltgeschichte der Umwelt. C.H. Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichart M (1999) Umweltschutz durch völkerrechtliches Strafrecht. Peter Lang¸ Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomuschat C (2001), Schädigung der Umwelt als Verbrechen nach Völkerstrafrecht. In: Arndt H-W et al (eds) Völkerrecht und deutsches Recht, Festschrift für Walter Rudolf zum 70. Geburtstag. C.H. Beck, Munich, pp 105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Werle G, Jeßberger F (2014) Principles of international criminal law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank his research assistant, Ms. Tabea Hill, for her help with the English text of the manuscript and his student assistant, Ms. Sophie Straßer, for her help with the references.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Heger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 T.M.C. Asser press and the authors

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heger, M. (2017). Trafficking in Hazardous Wastes (Article 28L) and Illicit Exploitation of Natural Resources (Article 28Lbis). In: Werle, G., Vormbaum, M. (eds) The African Criminal Court. International Criminal Justice Series, vol 10. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-150-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-150-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-149-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-150-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships