Abstract
What is the relationship between values, authority and education? I believe one very probable first thought could be some kind of idea of moral education. Others might be sceptical, or hold critical views that education and teachers have now lost the authority they used to have in the schooldays of the elders of today, or that neoliberalism and commodification have wiped all old values out of education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bermúdez, J. L. (2003). Thinking without words. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandom, R. (2009). Reason in philosophy: Animating ideas. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Deely, J. (2001). Physioemiosis in the semiotic spiral: A play of musement 1. Sign Systems Studies, 29(1), 27.
Deely, J. (2004). Semiotics and Jakob von Uexkull’s concept of Umwelt. Sign Systems Studies, 32(1), 11–34.
Dewey, J. (1985). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey: 1899-1924. Volume 9, Democracy and education, 1916. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Douven, I. (2011). Peirce on abduction (supplement). In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2011 Ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/peirce.html
Floch, J. (2001). Semiotics, marketing and communication: Beneath the signs, the strategies. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2009). Inhimillinen: Ainutlaatuisuutemme tiede [Human: the science behind what makes us unique], K. Pietiläinen (Trans.). Helsinki, Finland: Terra Cognita.
Greimas, A. J., & Courtés, J. (1982). Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Greimas, A. J. (1980). Strukturaalista semantiikkaa [Sémantique structurale: recherche de méthode], E. Tarasti (Trans.). Helsinki, Finland: Gaudeamus.
Greimas, A. J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. London, England: Pinter.
Heil, J. (2003). From an ontological point of view. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Kant, I. (1992). Kant on education [Ueber Pädagogik], A. Churton (Trans.). Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.
Kivelä, A., Siljander, P., & Sutinen, A. (2012). Between Bildung and growth–connections and controversies. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and growth: Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism (pp. 303–312). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Kristjánsson, K. (2010). Emotion education without ontological commitment? Studies in Philosophy & Education, 29(3), 259–274. doi:10.1007/s11217-009-9165-z
Kusch, M. (1983). Kantin oppi kategorisesta imperatiivista. luonnollinen siveellisyys ja kategorinen imperatiivi. [Kant’s doctrine of categorical imperative: Natural morality and categorical imperative]. Genesis: Filosofinen Kulttuurilehti, (2), 29–34.
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? London, England: Duckworth.
Peirce, C. S., & Marty, R. (2012). Peirce’s arisbe: 76 definitions of the sign by C.S. Peirce. Retrieved February 28, 2014, from http://www.cspeirce.com/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.htm
Pikkarainen, E. (in print). Competence as a key concept of educational theory: A semiotic point of view. Journal of Philosophy of Education.
Pikkarainen, E. (2013). From the ontology of interaction to the semiotics of education. In K. Tirri & E. Kuusisto (Eds.), Interaction in educational domains (pp. 51–62). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
Saussure, F. d. (1983). Course in general linguistics. London, England: Duckworth.
Sebeok, T. (1991). A sign is just a sign. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Stojanov, K. (2007). Bildung as deontic scorekeeping? Toward a social-pragmatist approach in educational theory. Papers of the Annual Conference of the Society for Philosophy of Education of Great Britain.
Tarasti, E. (2012). Existential semiotics and cultural psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 316–343). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Thom, R. (1985). From the icon to the symbol. In R. E. Innis (Ed.), Semiotics: An introductory anthology (pp. 275–291). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Ontario, ON: Althouse.
Wittgenstein, L. (1981). Filosofisia tutkimuksia [Philosophische Untersuchungen], H. Nyman (Trans.). Porvoo, Finland: WSOY.
Wulf, C. (2003). Educational science: Hermeneutics, empirical research, critical theory. Münster, Germany: Waxmann. Retrieved from http://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2010/1564/pdf/Educational_Science_final_D.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pikkarainen, E. (2014). Education, Values and Authority. In: Semetsky, I., Stables, A. (eds) Pedagogy and Edusemiotics. Educational Futures Rethinking Theory and Practice , vol 62. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-857-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-857-2_9
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-857-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)