Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Research – New Voices ((NRNV))

Abstract

As social networks, mobile devices, and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) increasingly transform educational spaces, researchers are confronted with the dual challenge of investigating how these tools are changing the face of education while also trying to mediate the use of these tools in the research process itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asselin, M., & Moayeri, M. (2010). New tools for new literacies research: An exploration of usability testing software. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(1), 41-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, C. (2009). Shifting boundaries in ethnographic methodology. Ethnography & Education, 4(3), 251-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baym, N. K., & Markham, A. N. (2009). Introduction: Making smart choices on shifting ground. In A. N. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (p. vii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneito-Montagut, R. (2011). Ethnography goes online: Towards a user-centred methodology to research interpersonal communication on the internet. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 716-735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. (2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 38-57). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2011). Six provocations for big data. From Oxford Internet Institute’s “A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society” (pp. 1-17). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431

  • Buckingham, D. (2009). ‘Creative’ visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture & Society, 31(4), 633-652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 487-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The future of qualitative research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirksen, V., Huizing, A., & Smit, B. (2010). “Piling on layers of understanding”: The use of connective ethnography for the study of (online) work practices. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1045-1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, J.W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139-182). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K., & Freeman, B. (2011). Multi-site ethnography, hypermedia and the productive hazards of digital methods: A struggle for liveness. Ethnography and Education, 6(3), 357-373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Discipline and practice: “The field” as site, method, and location in Anthropology. In A. Gupta & J. Ferguson (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science (pp. 1-46). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. A., Stornaiuolo, A., & Sahni, U. (2010). Cultural citizenship and cosmopolitan practice: Global youth communicate online. English Education, 42(4), 331-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. A., Stornaiuolo, A., & Sterponi, L. (2013). Imagined readers and hospitable texts: Global youth connect online. In D. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1208-1240). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K. D., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., et al. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media & Learning Research Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K. M. (2009). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 33-66). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2012). Rereading “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K., & McKim, K. K. (2003). Tracing the everyday “sitings” of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Dynamical Systems, 7(4), 273-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., & Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and technology 2013. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2013/PIP_TeensandTechnology2013.pdf

  • Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierides, D. (2010). Multi-sited ethnography and the field of educational research. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 179-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2001). Doing ethnography: Media, images, and representation in research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Mendelson, A. L. (2012). A qualitative experiment: Research on mediated meaning construction using a hybrid approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 332-347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2013, April). Interactive data visualization techniques for tracing development of writing practices. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Hull, G. A. (2012). Critical literacies and social media: Fostering ethical engagement with global youth. In J. Ávila & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges (pp. 63-84). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soep, E. (2012). The digital afterlife of youth-made media: Implications for media literacy education. Comunicar, 19(38), 93-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stornaiuolo, A. (2012). The educational turn of social networking: Teachers and their students negotiate social media. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stornaiuolo, A., & Higgs, J., & Hull, G. (2013). Social media as authorship: Methods for studying literacies and communities online. In P. Albers, T. Holbrook, A.S. Flint (Eds.), New literacy research methods (pp. 224-237). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, L., & Woodthorpe, K. (2011). Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research, 11(2), 197-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. L. (2009). Ethnography 2.0: Writing with digital video. Ethnography and Education, 4(3), 389-414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, R., Crow, G., & Pain, H. (2011). Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 587-604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stornaiuolo, A., Hall, M. (2014). Tracing Resonance. In: Gudmundsdottir, G.B., Vasbø, K.B. (eds) Methodological Challenges When Exploring Digital Learning Spaces in Education. New Research – New Voices. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-737-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics