Skip to main content

Abstract

As we stated in the Preface, “there are no universal solutions to the problems involved in setting up and operating a quality doctoral program. Rather, educators would be wise to be aware of the alternatives at their disposal and make informed choices based on an understanding of their institution and the larger societal contexts.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert teachers: Their characteristics, development and accomplishments. In R. Batllori i Obiols, A. E Gomez Martinez, M. Oller i Freixa, & J. Pages i. Blanch (Eds.), De la teoria …. A l’aula: Formacio del professorat ensenyament de las ciències socials (pp. 13–28). Barcelona, Spain: Departament de Didàctica de la Llengua de la Literatura I de les Ciències Socials, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittlestone, R., Diggle, J., & Underhill, J. (2005). Odysseus unbound: The search for Homer’s Ithaca. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2010). The disposable academic: Why doing a Ph.D. is often a waste of time, December 16, 2010. Retrieved November 11, 2013, from http://www.economist.com/node/17723223/print.

  • The European Charter and Code for Researchers. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2013, from http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/index.cfm/rights/whatIsAResearcher.

  • Kehm, B. M. (2012). Die deutsche Doktorandenausbildung aus europäischer Perspektive. In B. M. Kehm, H. Schomburg, & U. Teichler. (Eds.), Funktionswandel der Universitäten (pp. 340–355). Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R. (2013). Changing doctoral practice: The doctorate in the 21st Century. Paper presented at the CHER 26th Annual Conference, Lausanne, 9–11 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1991). Graduate education. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), International higher education: An encyclopedia (pp. 127–146). New York and London: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendler, C., Bridgeman, B., Cline, F., Millett, C., Rock, J., Bell, N., & McAllister, P. (2010). The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, L.W., Ibarrola, M.d., Phillips, D.C., Salomon, G., Teichler, U. (2014). Key Questions for Thought and Action. In: Ibarrola, M.d., Anderson, L.W. (eds) The Nurturing of New Educational Researchers. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-698-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics