Skip to main content

International Collaboration

Processes, Benefits, Tensions, and Conclusions

  • Chapter
Teaching in Tension

Abstract

International collaborations are becoming more common in the field of education, and throughout the academy, as the ease of travel and communication have made it easier to work across national boundaries. In addition, many academic institutions are seeking to internationalize their campuses through expanded study abroad offerings and additional incentives for faculty to develop research programs beyond national borders. The same time-space compression characteristic of globalization in other fields greatly affects higher education, as universities are becoming multinational institutions with campuses in two or more countries and faculty and students engaged in cross-border instruction and knowledge production. Finally, some scholars are committed to efforts to better integrate local expertise and knowledge as they attempt to decolonize or, at a minimum, democratize forms of social research. However, those who have engaged in research that brings together scholars and practitioners from multiple countries are well aware of the obstacles and tensions that frequently emerge as myriad differences in access to resources, demands on faculty time, and discursive conventions become apparent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Melissa, & Nicholas Steneck, eds. (2010). International Research Collaborations: Much to be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Melissa, Felly Chiteng Kot, Yiyung Jie, Takehito Kamata, Aliya Kuzhabekova, Christine Lepkowski, Marta Shaw, Martha Sorenson, & Sonia Vasconcelos. (2010). “Differences in National Approaches to Doctoral Education.” In Melissa Anderson and Nicholas Steneck (Eds.), International Research Collaborations: Much to be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble (pp. 169–190). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, Audrey. (2009). “Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, and Transdisciplinary Collaboration: Implications for Vocational Psychology.” International Journal of Educational Vocational Guidance, 9, 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, Erin. (2008). “Methodological Memes and Mores: Toward a Sociology of Social Research.” Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, Stanley. (1992). “Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some Thoughts about Evidence in Sociology.” American Sociological Review, 57, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Matthew, & Allen Rugambwa. (2011). “Equity, Power, and Capabilities: Constructions of Gender in a Tanzanian Secondary School.” Feminist Formations, 24, 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartlett, L. et al. (2013). International Collaboration. In: Teaching in Tension. Pittsburgh Studies in Comparative and International Education, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-224-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships