Abstract
International collaborations are becoming more common in the field of education, and throughout the academy, as the ease of travel and communication have made it easier to work across national boundaries. In addition, many academic institutions are seeking to internationalize their campuses through expanded study abroad offerings and additional incentives for faculty to develop research programs beyond national borders. The same time-space compression characteristic of globalization in other fields greatly affects higher education, as universities are becoming multinational institutions with campuses in two or more countries and faculty and students engaged in cross-border instruction and knowledge production. Finally, some scholars are committed to efforts to better integrate local expertise and knowledge as they attempt to decolonize or, at a minimum, democratize forms of social research. However, those who have engaged in research that brings together scholars and practitioners from multiple countries are well aware of the obstacles and tensions that frequently emerge as myriad differences in access to resources, demands on faculty time, and discursive conventions become apparent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, Melissa, & Nicholas Steneck, eds. (2010). International Research Collaborations: Much to be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble. New York: Routledge.
Anderson, Melissa, Felly Chiteng Kot, Yiyung Jie, Takehito Kamata, Aliya Kuzhabekova, Christine Lepkowski, Marta Shaw, Martha Sorenson, & Sonia Vasconcelos. (2010). “Differences in National Approaches to Doctoral Education.” In Melissa Anderson and Nicholas Steneck (Eds.), International Research Collaborations: Much to be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble (pp. 169–190). New York: Routledge.
Collin, Audrey. (2009). “Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, and Transdisciplinary Collaboration: Implications for Vocational Psychology.” International Journal of Educational Vocational Guidance, 9, 101–110.
Leahey, Erin. (2008). “Methodological Memes and Mores: Toward a Sociology of Social Research.” Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 33–53.
Lieberson, Stanley. (1992). “Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some Thoughts about Evidence in Sociology.” American Sociological Review, 57, 1–15.
Thomas, Matthew, & Allen Rugambwa. (2011). “Equity, Power, and Capabilities: Constructions of Gender in a Tanzanian Secondary School.” Feminist Formations, 24, 153–175.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bartlett, L. et al. (2013). International Collaboration. In: Teaching in Tension. Pittsburgh Studies in Comparative and International Education, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-224-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-224-2_10
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-224-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)