Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incorporating Technology and Web Tools in Creativity Instruction

  • Chapter
Creatively Gifted Students are not like Other Gifted Students

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 5))

Abstract

The Global world is constantly transforming, with new technologies changing the way we learn, communicate, and collaborate. The ways of working and learning change with emerging innovations through the World Wide Web and Web 2.0, and 3.0 tools, a trend expected to continue (PEW Internet & American Life Project, 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbitt, J. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43, 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Retrieved August 4, 2011, from http://k20.internet2.edu/files/userfiles/108-online_nation.pdf

  • Anderson, J. Q., & Rainie, L. (2010, February 19). Does Google make us stupid? Retrieved June 7, 2011, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1499/google-does-it-make-us-stupid-experts-stakeholders-mostly-say-no

  • Art Education 2.0. (2011). Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://arted20.ning.com/

  • Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 146–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATEE. (2011, May). ATEE Spring Conference 2011. Retrieved August 31, 2011, from ATEE Association for Teacher Education in Europe: http://www.atee1.org/conferences_and_seminars/19/atee_spring_conference_2011#algemeen

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwell, G. (2007, January). Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? Retrieved June 7, 2011, from http://www.elearningpapers.eu

  • Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Ragan, S., Cromley, J. C., & Pritchett, S. (2003, April). Do different goal-setting conditions facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning of complex science topics with riverweb? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating online teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begley, S. (2011, March 7). I can’t think. Newsweek, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P. D., & Akroyd, D. (2006). Can factors related to self-regulated learning predict learning achievement in undergraduate asynchronous Web-based courses? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(10), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 321-331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 775-786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenchley, C. (2011, June 3). Launching the FY2011 Investing in Innovation (i3) Competition. Retrieved June 13, 2011, from http://www.ed.gov/blog/2011/06/launching-the-fy2011-investing-in-innovation-i3-competition/

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, G. (2010, March 1). Investing In Innovation. Retrieved June 22, 2011, from http://www.forbescom/2010/03/01/science-technology-education-thought-leaders-britt_2.html.

  • Bronson, P. O., & Merryman, A. (2010, July 19). The creativity crisis. Newsweek, 44-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, M. (2011, August 8). Obama to Offer States a Break from ‘No Child Left Behind’. Retrieved September 2, 2011, from abc News : http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/08/obama-to-offer-states-a-break-from-no-child-left-behind/

  • Burnard, P. (2006). Reflecting on the creativity agenda in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center on Education Policy. (2011). NCLB Waiver Watch. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from Center on Education Policy: http://www.cep-dc.org/page.cfm?FloatingPageID=21

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development oftechnological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 13, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T., & Zane, B. (2005). Academic, Economic, and Technological A. 21st Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning (pp. 1–5). Madison, WI: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coler, M. A. (1968). Creativity in Technology and the Arts. Leonardo, 1, 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A., & Jeffrey, B. (2004). Creative practice and practice which fosters creativity. In L. Miller & J. Devereux (Eds.), Supporting children’s learning in the early years (pp.105–112). London: David Fulton in association with The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28, 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity (pp. 313–338). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J., Haderlie, S., & Ku, T. (1999). Specified learning goals and their effect on learners’ representations of a hypertext reading environment. International Journal of Instructional Media 26(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered Web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using Web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self- regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33, 513–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: Prompt for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 819–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, V. (1997). In search of the wild Bohemian: Challenges in the identification of the creatively gifted. Roeper Review, 19, 148–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. (2005, October 17). E-learning 2.0. Retrieved June 24, 2011, from http://www.elearnmag/org/subpage.cfm?section=articles%26;article=29-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. (2006, October 16). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge. Retrieved June 26, 2011, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/paper92.html

  • Dyson, J. (2011). Link between creativity and practicality. Times Education Supplement, Issue 4936, 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Ambassadors for Creativity and Innovation. (2009). Creativity and Innovation European Year 2009 Manifesto. Retrieved August 28, 2011, from http://www.create2009.europa.eu/fileadmin/Content/Downloads/PDF/Manifesto/manifesto.en.pdf

  • European Year of Creativity and Innovation 2009. (2009). Europa: Imagine, Create, Innovate. Retrieved April 23, 2011, from http://www.create2009.europa.eu/

  • Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22, 148–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2004). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. L. (2007). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 161–168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Thomson, P., & Russell, L. (2007). Teaching like an artist: The pedagogic identities and practices of artists in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28, 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrove, R. A. (2007). Creating creativity in the design studio: Assessing the impact of metacognitive skill development on creative abilities. UMI Microform 3329259. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, E. V. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., Greene, M. T., & Hartzell, S. (2011). Cognitive and motivational characteristics of elementary teachers in general education classrooms and in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., Hartzell, S., & Greene, M. T. (2009). Fostering creativity in the classroom: Effects of teachers’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, and goal orientation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 192–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., & Milgram, R. M. (2008). Preventing talent loss. New York: Routeldge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Wu, J. (2010, August). Effects of explicit instruction, metacognition, and motivation on creative performance. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J. T. (1997). Value, expectancy, metacognition, resourced management, and academic achievement: A structural model of self-regulated learning in a distance education context. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(5), 1458. (UMI No. 9835152)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, S. (2009). Exploration of secondary students’ creativity by integrating Web-based technology into an innovative science curriculum. Computer and Education, 52, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Adams, S., and Haywood, K., (2011). The NMC Horizon Report: 2011 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Y., Bong, M., & Choi, H. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, I. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of web-based instruction in the context of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 525 – 534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, T. (2008, January 24). Jan. 24, 1984: Birth of the Cool. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from Wired: http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/01/dayintech_0124

  • Kao, J. (2011, June). Are we still an innovation nation? Retrieved August 8, 2011, from http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/05/are-we-still-an-innovation-nation/

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J., & Ivcevic, Z. (2010). Creativity polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartender. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 358–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, D. (2009, November 6). Moving Past No Child Left Behind. Science, 326, 803–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, J., & Lettl, C. (2009). Distinctive roles of lead users and opinion leaders in the social networks of schoolchildren. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 646–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76, 567–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2006). Cognitive tools for self-regulated e-learning. In M. Bullen & D. P. Janes (Eds.). Making the Transition to E-learning: Strategies and Issues (pp. 300–317). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010, February). Social Media & Mobil Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Social_Media_and_Young_Adults_Report_Final_with_toplines.pdf

  • Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2010, August 14). The digital disconnect. Retrieved February 28, 2011, from http://www.pewinternet.org

  • Liu, M. (2004). Examining the performance and attitudes of sixth graders during their use of a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Lee, S., & Su, B. (2005). Exploring four dimensions of online instructor roles: A program level case study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9(4), 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context [Electronic version]. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K. K., & Wagner, C. (1994). Stimulating ideas through creativity software. Management Science, 40, 1514–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, M. (2010). Teacher education can’t ignore technology. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(2), 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robelen, E. (2011, January). Obama Emphasizes STEM Education in the State of the Union. Downloaded August 28, 2011, from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2011/01/obama_laments_quality_of_us_ma.html

  • Office of the Press Secretary. (2009, November 23). President Obama Launches “Educate to Innovate” Campaign for Excellence in Science, Technology, Engineering & Math (Stem) Education. Retrieved June 26, 2011, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-launches-educate-innovate-campaign-excellence-science-technology-en

  • Ozkan, H. H. (2010). Cooperative learning technique through Internet based education: A model proposal. Retrieved April 25, 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3673/is_3_130/ai_n52943094/?tag=mantle_skin;content

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquinelli, M. (2010). Digital neofeudalism: Crisis of network politics and the new topology of rent. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from http://matteopasquinelli.com/docs/Pasquinelli_Digital_neofeudalism.pdf

  • Peng, H., Tsai, C., & Wu, Y. (2006). University students’ self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the internet: The role of students’ perceptions of the Internet. Educational Studies, 32, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, O. (1998). Learning and teaching in distance education: Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2010, July 2). The Future of Online Socializing. Retrieved June 4, 2011, from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1652/social-relations-online-experts-predict-future

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self - regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychology, 39, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001, October). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Retrieved April 5, 2011, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/prensky%20-%20digital%20natives,%20digital%20immigrants%20-%20part1.pdf

  • Runco, M., Johnson, D., & Bear, P. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutland, M., & Barlex, D. (2008). Perspectives on pupil creativity in design and technology in the lower secondary curriculum in England. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 139–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schorn, D. (2009, February 11). The “Millennials” Are Coming. Retrieved April 30, 2011, from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/08/60minutes/main3475200.shtml?tag=contentMain;contentBody

  • Schrum, L., & Hong, S. (2002). Dimensions and strategies for online success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1). Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/sites/default/files/v6n1_schrum_1.pdf

  • Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and education. Creative Education, 1, 166–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2006a). Knowing Knowledge. Retrieved March 4, 2011, from http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf

  • Siemens, G. (2006b, November 12). Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime of the Self-Amused? Retrieved June 26, 2011, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/Connectivism_response.doc

  • Simonton, D. K. (1992). The social context of career success and course for 2026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbert, J. A. (1994). Creative in education revisited: Reflection aid of progression. Journal of Creative Behavior, 28, 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2010). Web 2.0 How-to for Educators. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. (2009). Creativity, Knowledge and Curriculum in further education: A Bernsteinian Perspective. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1963). The creative personality and the ideal pupil. Teachers College Record, 65, 220–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P., & Safter, J. T. (1986). Are children becoming more creative? Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Bisset, R. (2007). Performanativity by stealth: A critique of recent initiatives on creativity. Education, 3–13, 35, 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2009a). Race to the Top Program Executive Summary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2009b, October 6). U.S. Secretary of Education Announces National Competition to Invest in Innovation. Retrieved June 23, 2011, from http://www2.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2009/10/10062009a.html

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2010a, August 24). Nine States and the District of Columbia Win Second Round Race to the Top Grants. Retrieved June 26, 2011, from ED.gov: http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/nine-states-and-district-columbia-win-second-round-race-top-grants

  • U.S. Department of Education (2010b, September). Policy and Program Studies Service, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policity Development. Retrieved August 5, 2011, from: http://www2ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf.

  • Usher, A. (2011). Update with 2009–10 Data and Five-Year Trends: How Many Schools Have Not Made Adequate Yearly Progress? Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Harmelen, M. (2006). Personal Learning Environments. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 1–2). IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, R., & Vidal, V. (2009). Creativity for problem solvers. AI & Society, 23, 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Lin, S. S. J. (2007). The application of social cognitive theory to Web-based learning through NetPorts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of Web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an online class. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 151–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2010). Keeping Pace with K-12 Online Learning: Reports and Graphics for Download. Retrieved June 5, 2011, from http://www.kpk12.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/KeepingPaceK12_2010.pdf

  • Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a Web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (2009). (2nd ed.). Creativity in primary education. Exeter: Learning Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., & Milligan, C. (2010, August 22). Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Retrieved June 25, 2011, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.107.3816&rep=rep1%26;type=pdf

  • Wolters, C., Pintrich, P., & Karabenick, S. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In K. Moore & L. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251–270). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2009). Comments on Greenhow, Robelia, and Hughes: Toward a Creative Social Web for Learners and Teachers. Educational Researcher, 38, 274–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., & Duke, N. K. (2011). The impact of instruction in the WWWDOT framework on students’ disposition and ability to evaluate Web sites as sources of information. Elementary School Journal, 112, 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. E. Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Ditzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA

    Kyung Hee Kim

  2. California State University, San Bernardino, USA

    James C. Kaufman

  3. Rider University, New Jersey, USA

    John Baer

  4. The University of Montana, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hong, E., Ditzler, C. (2013). Incorporating Technology and Web Tools in Creativity Instruction. In: Kim, K.H., Kaufman, J.C., Baer, J., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creatively Gifted Students are not like Other Gifted Students. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-149-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation