Abstract
Darwin postulated that the way organisms evolve is adaptive; otherwise, they wouldn’t be here. The same could be said of institutions of higher education. These institutions, like organisms, must evolve in order to survive. The growing trend toward the virtual organization has awakened colleges and universities to the need to prepare students for a virtual workplace. Consequently, institutions of higher education are reworking many of the courses in their programs to maximize e-learning opportunities for their students. As a result, there is a rapid adoption of e-curriculum globally in institutions of higher education. However, it is vital that certain conditions be met to ensure the quality and sustainability of these online courses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, E.I., and Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. Retrieved from http://www.sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf
Alschuler, A.S., and Blimling, G.S. (1995). Curbing epidemic cheating through systemic change. College Teaching. 43(4), pp. 123–126.
Beck, U. (2000). The brave new world of work. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.
Brandt, D.S. (2002). Copyright’s (not so) little cousin, plagiarism. Computers in Libraries. 22(5) pp. 39–42.
Brown, M. (2005). Learning spaces. In D.G. Oblinger & J.L. Oblinger (Eds.) Educatingt the Net Generation [Online book]. Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
Davis, S., and Kilbourn, B. (2008). Development and examination of an individualized online adjunct to in-class education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 5(1), pp. 63–71.
Di Petta, T., Novak, J.M., and Marini, Z.A. (2002). Inviting Online Education. (Fastback no. 498). Bloomington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Fineman, S., Sims, D., and Gabriel, Y. (2005). Organizing and Organizations (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Furrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gardner, H. (2000). The Disciplined Mind: Beyond Facts and Standardized Test. The K-12 Education That Every Child Deserves. Toronto: Penguin Canada.
Garrison, D.R., and Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gephart Jr., R.P. (2002). Introduction to the brave new workplace: organizational behaviour in the electronic age. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 23, 327–344.
Hara, N. and Kling, R. (2000). Students’ frustrations with a web-based distance education course. First Monday. 4(12). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_12/hava/.
Henry, J., and Meadows, J. (2009, January 25). An absolutely riveting online course: Nine principles for excellence in web-based teaching. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. Retrieved from: http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/179/177
Kraglund-Gauthier, W.L., Chareka, O., Murray Orr, A., & Foran, A. (2010). Teacher education in online classrooms: An inquiry into instructors’ lived experiences. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 1(2). Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol1/iss2/4
Longobardi, G. (2003). Live learning on the Web. CLO Magazine. Retrieved November 19,2005 from: http://www.clomedia.com/content/templates/clo_issue_toc.asp?articleid=115&zoneid=99
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 50(4), 370–96.
Mason, R., and Rennie, F. (2010). Evolving technologies. Handbook of Online Learning. 2nd Ed. (Eds.), Rudestam & Schoenholtz-Read. Los Angeles: Sage. 91–128
McNeely, B. (2005). Using technology as a learning tool, not just a cool new thing. In D.G. Oblinger & J.L. Oblinger (Eds.) Educating the Net Generation [Online book]. Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen
Mills, S., Yanes, M.J., and Casebeer, C. (2009). Perceptions of distance learning among faculty of a college of education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 5(1), pp. 19– 28.
Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., Upchurch, R., Hartman, J., and Truman, B. (2006). Assessing online learning: what one university learned about student success, persistence, and satisfaction. Peer Review. Retrieved April 2, 2009 from: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4115/is_200610/ai_n17195969
Nichols, J., Shaffer, B., and Shockey, K. (2003). Changing the face of instruction: Is online or in-class more effective?. College & Research Libraries. 378–388.
Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers & Millennials: Understanding the New Students. Educause Review, pp. 37–47.
Oblinger D. G., and Oblinger, J.L. (2005). Educating the Net generation. Educause. Retrieved April 2, 2009 from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf.
OECD. (2009). New millennium learners in higher education: Evidence and policy implications. Technology in higher education. (in press).
Paldy, L.G. (1996). The problem that won’t go away: addressing the causes of cheating. Journal of College Science Teaching. 26(1), pp. 4–6.
Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: plagiarism by university students - literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 28(5). Carfax Publishing.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), pp. 1–6.
Rudestam, K.E., and Schoenholtz-Read, J. (Eds.) (2010). Handbook of online learning. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Tremblay, R. (June, 2006). Technical Evaluation Report 55. Best Practices and Collaborative Software in Online Teaching. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, Vol. 7, No. 1. Athabasca University.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C.
Wallace, R.M. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education Communication, and Information, 3(2), 241–280.
Warren, L. and Holloman Jr., H. (2005). On-line instruction: Are the outcomes the same?. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 32(2), pp. 148–151.
Woolsey, S.E. (2013). Comparison of learning outcomes between an in-class and an online course. Brock Univeristy, St. Catharines. ON.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woolsey, S. (2013). Quality And Sustainability Concerns for Online Course Offerings in Higher Education. In: Kompf, M., Denicolo, P.M. (eds) Critical Issues in Higher Education. Critical Issues in The Future of Learning and Teaching, vol 8. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-046-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-046-0_18
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-046-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)