Skip to main content

Women in Engineering in the UK

Approaches to Inclusion and Engineering Curriculum Development

  • Chapter
GIEE 2011: Gender and Interdisciplinary Education for Engineers

Abstract

Despite sustained efforts to promote engineering careers to young women it remains the most male dominated academic discipline. This paper will provide an overview of UK data and research on women studying engineering in higher education, within the context of Europe. Reporting on preliminary findings of a EUfunded project we will discuss how gender inclusion is being addressed in the UK alongside engineering curriculum development and innovation, and how research on engineering in education is framed in economic or utilitarian, rather than genderequality, terms. We suggest that the current climate of curriculum innovation is an ideal time to emphasise the importance of gender inclusivity in what is traditionally a male subject area in order to promote a culture of equality and inclusion in engineering at higher education institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Agapiou A. Perceptions of Gender Roles and Attitudes toward Work Among Male and Female Operatives in the Scottish Construction Industry. Construction Management and Economics. 2002;20:697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearn, A., C. Wise, E. McCann and P. Goring (2005) Constructionarium: Building to Learn. CEBE Transactions, Vol. 2, Issue 1, April 2005, pp 6–16 (11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpay E, Ahearn AL, Graham RH, Bull AMJ. ‘Student enthusiasm for engineering: charting changes in student aspirations and motivation.’, European Journal of Engineering Education, 2008;33(5):573–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole B, Goode J. The ‘Gender Dimension’ of both the ‘Narrow’ and ‘Broad’ Curriculum in UK Higher Education: Do women lose out in both? Gender and Education. 1998;10(4):445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B.M., Powell, A., Dainty, A.R.J. and Neale, R.H. (2005) ’‘The UK Engineering Professions: Women Students’ Perspectives’’, International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, 5, 2005,

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole B, Powell A, Barnard S, Dainty A. Researching Cultures in Science, Engineering and Technology: An analysis of current and past literature. Bradford: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, S., Bagilhole, B., Dainty, A. and T. Hassan (2009) ‘State of the Art: Career Choice and Gender’, Deliverable 2.2 for the EU-funded HELENA project. See http://www.fp7-helena.org/

  • Barnard, S., T. Hassan, B. Bagilhole and A. Dainty (2012) “They’re not girly girls’: an exploration of quantitative and qualitative data on engineering and gender in Higher Education’ in the European Journal of Engineering Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beder S. Towards a More Representative Engineering Education. International Journal of Applied Engineering Education. 1989;5(2):173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter R, Kirkup G. Women in Engineering: A good place to be? Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn C. Caught in the Wheels: The high cost of being a female cog in the male machinery of engineering. In: Mackenzie D, Wajcman J, editors. The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotgrave, A. (2005) Tuning the Undergraduate Construction Curriculum: Embedding Health, Safety and Environmental Issues in Order to Improve Employability, CEBE Transactions, Vol. 2, Issue 1, April 2005, pp 28–43 (16).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin C, Roger A. Theorizing Progress: Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology in Higher Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1999;36(6):637–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Council UK. Output Standards for Accredited Engineering Programmes. Engineering Council UK: London; 2004a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Council UK. UK-SPEC Standard for Chartered Engineers and Incorporated Engineers. London: ECUK; 2004b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Education Centre (2003) Problem-based Learning at the Manchester School of Engineering. Available at: http://www.pble.ac.uk/pble-sd/school-wide-pbl-inmanchester.pdf.

  • Evetts J. Managing the technology but not the organization: women and career in engineering. Women in Management Review. 1998;13(8):283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández ML, Castro YR, Otero MC, Foltz ML, Lorenzo MG. «Sexism, vocational goals, and motivation as predictors of men’s and women’s career choice», Sex Roles. Vol.. 2006;55:267–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale AW. Women in Non-traditional Occupations: The construction industry. Women in Management Review. 1994;9(2):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfroy-Genin A. ‘Women’s academic careers in technology: a comparative European perspective’, Equal Opportunities International. 2009;28(1):80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GP, Macpherson DE, Williams DA. Promoting interdisciplinarity in engineering teaching. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2007;32(3):285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henwood F, Miller K. ‘Editorial: Boxed in or Coming out? On the Treatment of Science, Technology and Gender in Educational Research’, Gender and Education, 2001;13(3),237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institution of Engineering and Technology (2008) Studying STEM: What are the Barriers?: A Literature Review of the Choices Students Make. Research report conducted by Lyn Haynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivins, J.R. (1997) Interdisciplinary project work: practice makes perfect? IEEE Trans. Educ., 1997, 40(3), 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhill HM, Campbell RG, Cullen DM, Armour M, Einsiedel AA, Ciccocioppo A, Sherman J, Stewin LL, Varnhagen S, Montgomerie TC, Rothwell CJ, Coffin WL. Developing Career Commitment in STEM Related Fields: Myth versus reality. In: Burke RJ, Mattis MC, editors. Women and Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: Upping the numbers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Sáez M. Cultural and individual processes involved in gender stereotyping. An empirical study of career selection. The Spanish journal ofpsychology. 1994;9:213–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markes I. A review of literature on employability skill needs in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2006;31(6):637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, C.D., Cunningham, G., Buchanan, F.J. and McAfee, M. (2008) Application of a Generic Curriculum Change Management Process to Motivate and Excite Students. EE2008. The International Conference on Innovation, Good Practice and Research in Engineering Education Conference Proceedings. Loughborough, UK, 14–16 July 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps A. Engineering Women: The ‘Gendering’ of Professional Idsntities. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2002;15(4):409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell A, Bagilhole B, Dainty A, Neale, R. Does the Engineering Culture in UK Higher Educatioa Advsacs Women’s Careers. Equal Opportunities International. 2004;23(7/5):21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, B. and S. Coates (Pee5) Maximizing the benefits of training engineers about gender, 31 st WEDC International Conference, Kampala, Uganda, 2005, 239–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagebiel, F. and Dahmen, J. (2006) ‘Masculinities in organizational cultures in engineering education in Europe: results of the European Union project WomEng’, European Journal of Engineering Education, 31:1,5 — 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • She Figures (2009) She Figures: Statistics and Figures on Gender Equality in Science. European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, T.D., J.A. Garsihe anh E. Appleton (2003) Industry anh the Engineering Stuhent: a Marriage Made in Heaven? Global Journal of Engineering Education 7(1): 77–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skates GW. ‘Interdisciplinary project working in engineering education.’ European Journal of Engineering Education. 2003;25:2,157–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinks N, Silburn NLJ, Birchall DW. Making it all work: the engineering graduate of the future, a UK perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2007;32(3):325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A.K. (1996) Widening access: women in construction higher education. Ph.D. thesis, Leehs Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCAS (2009) Online statistics on student applications and acceptances by subject. Available at: www.ucas.ac.uk

  • UKRC (2011) Why Gender Equality? Available at; http://www.theukrc.org/resources/why-genderequality

  • Woolnough BE. Affecting Students’ Choice of Science and Engineering. International Journal of Science Education. 1994;16(6):659–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnard, S., Bagilhole, B., Dainty, A., Hassan, T. (2012). Women in Engineering in the UK. In: Béraud, A., Godfroy, AS., Michel, J. (eds) GIEE 2011: Gender and Interdisciplinary Education for Engineers. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-982-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics