Skip to main content

Developing Critical Reflection as a Research Method

  • Chapter
Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching

Part of the book series: Practice, Education, Work and Society ((PEWS,volume 5))

Abstract

Critical reflection is normally used in professional learning settings to assist practitioners to improve practice. I have worked for some time using critical reflection in this way with many different types of professionals. Over time, however, I have been impressed by the deeper and more complex understanding of practice experience which the process enables, and which practitioners themselves often cannot initially express. And so I have begun to speculate about the research potential of the critical reflection process, and whether it might be developed as a research method to allow better formulations of practice experience, and therefore, ultimately, better practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, B. (2005). Psychology and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2009). The concept of critical reflection: Promises and contradictions. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1995). States of injury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D. C. Heath & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1961). Pattern and meaning in history. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J., & Askeland, G.A. (2006). The “critical” in critical reflection. In S. White, J. Fook & F. Gardner (Eds.), Critical reflection in health and social care (pp. 40–53). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (Ed.) (2009). Understanding and researching professional practice. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, F. (1987). Female sexualisation: A collective work of memory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney, T.W., & Horton, A.I. (1991). Reflective engagement for social change. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 74–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, B., & West, L. (2009). Using biographical methods in social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.) (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steier, F. (Ed.) (1991). Research and reflexivity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, N., & Papadopoulos, D. (2006). Analysing everyday experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., & White, S. (2000). Practising reflexivity in health and welfare. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V.W., & Bruner, E.M. (1986). The anthropology of experience. Chicago: Uni. of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2001). Autoethnography as reflexive inquiry: The research act as self-surveillance. In I. Shaw & N. Gould (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 100–115). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fook, J. (2011). Developing Critical Reflection as a Research Method. In: Higgs, J., Titchen, A., Horsfall, D., Bridges, D. (eds) Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching. Practice, Education, Work and Society, vol 5. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-761-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships