Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Moral Development and Citizenship Education ((MORA,volume 5))

  • 1606 Accesses

Abstract

The prevailing belief today is that if young people can accumulate enough “points” in the “game of school”—test scores, grade point averages, number of Advanced Placement or honors classes, number of extracurricular activities—then they “win.” Many people emphasize numbers without interpretation. But what do the numbers mean? What are they for? With all this emphasis on academic achievement for its own sake, have we lost sight of why children should develop these intellectual capacities? What’s the use of these scores in the broader picture of a person’s life or a culture’s well-being?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M. X., &León-Agustí, P. (2009). Personal intelligences and a Colombian experience. In J. Chen, S. Moran, & H. Gardner (Eds.), Multiple intelligences around the world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: HoughtonMifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Moran, S., & Gardner, H. (Eds.) (2009). Multiple intelligences around the world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: Helping our children find their calling in life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., Menon, J., & Bronk, K. C. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L. A., Mountstephen, J., Lloyd, J., Hansen, K.,& Stough, C. (2008). Emotional intelligence and scholastic achievement in Australian adolescents.Australian Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W., & Pipp, S. L. (1984). Processes of cognitive development: Optimal level and skill acquisition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 45–80). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2008). Personality and intelligence at work: Exploring and explaining individual differences at work.New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestdottir, S., & Lerner, R. M. (2007). Intentional self-regulation and positive youth development in early adolescence: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 508–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 11 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. New York: World Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. (2006). Positive youth development, willful adolescents, and mentoring. Journalof Community Psychology, 34(6), 677–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) “'General Intelligence,' Objectively Determined and Measured.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86(1), 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Quinn, B., & Moran, S. (2011, under review). Adolescent purpose development: Exploring empathy, discovering roles, shifting priorities, and creating pathways.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marken, R.S. (1990). A science of purpose. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009a). Purpose: Giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009b). What role does commitment play among writers with different levels of creativity? Creativity Research Journal,21(2–3), 243–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2009c). Why multiple intelligences? In J. Chen, S. Moran, & H. Gardner (Eds.), Multiple intelligences around the world (pp. 365–373). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S. (2010). Changing the world: Tolerance and creativity aspirations among American youth. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., Bundick, M., Malin, H., & Reilly, T. S. (2011, under review). Psychological and social sources for youth purpose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & Gardner, H. (2006a). Extraordinary cognitive achievements: A developmental and systems analysis. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2 Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.; pp. 905–949). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & Gardner, H. (2006b). Multiple intelligences in the workplace. In H. Gardner, Multiple intelligences: New horizons (pp. 213–232). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contribution to the dialectic of creativity and development. In K. Sawyer et al., Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2004). How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 11–25). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, S., Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H. (2006, September). Orchestrating multiple intelligences. Educational Leadership, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12 (3), 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathman, K. (2005). Education, self-knowledge and life-planning: Why schools should help students decide “who” rather than just “what” they want to be. Unpublished thesis: University of London, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, V. (2009). The Howard Gardner School for Discovery. In J. Chen, S. Moran, & H. Gardner (Eds.), Multiple intelligences around the world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rode, J. C., Arthaud-Day, M. L., Mooney, C. H., Near, J. P., & Baldwin, T. T. (2008). Ability and personality predictors of salary, perceived job success, and perceived career success in the initial career stage. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(3), 292–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., Borneman, M. J., & Connelly, B. S. (2008). High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63(4), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In K. Sawyer et al., Creativity and development (pp. 12–60). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, P. S., & Barbee, A. H. (1977). Career and life satisfactions among Terman’s gifted women. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty year perspective (pp. 28–65). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, C. B. (2009). The challenges of assessing multiple intelligences around the world. In J. Chen, S. Moran, & H. Gardner (Eds.), Multiple intelligences around the world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Nokes, C., Geissler, P. W., Prince, R., Okiatcha, F., Bundy, D. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence, 29 (5), 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subotnik, R., & Arnold, A. (Eds.). (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. W., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted child grows up. (Vol. III of Genetic studies of genius, L. M. Terman (Ed.)). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K. (2008). Introduction. In K. Tirri (Ed.), Educating moral sensibilities in urban schools (pp. ix–xv). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2008). Identification of multiple intelligences with the Multiple Intelligence Profiling Questionnaire III. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(2), 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1958). The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D.,& Matthews, G. (2008).The science of emotional intelligence: Current consensus and controversies.European Psychologist, 13(1), 64–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 267–295).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moran, S. (2011). Assessing and Developing Multiple Intelligences Purposefully. In: Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P. (eds) Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education. Moral Development and Citizenship Education, vol 5. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-758-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships