Skip to main content

Difference and Discontinuity – Making Meaning Through Hypertexts

  • Chapter
Digital Difference

Part of the book series: Educational Futures Rethinking Theory and Practice ((EDUFUT,volume 50))

  • 1146 Accesses

Abstract

Digital writing is a practice with which university students engage regularly. Increasingly, students communicate with each other and their lecturers using email, message boards and online posts, among other forms. Unsurprisingly, the research into writing in digital contexts has focused on these types of texts, and although such writing departs in its production from more conventional ‘essayistic’ writing (Lillis 2001), it is still broadly linear in terms of the expression and organisation of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Antonesa, M. (2007). Can information literacy motivate students to become global citizens? Sconul Focus (42), 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1988). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, K. (2002). Reading, writing and teaching creative hypertext: A genre-based pedagogy. Pedagogy, 2(3), 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. (1998). Essay review: Digital texts and the future of scholarly writing and publication. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2003). Argument in hypertext: Writing strategies and the problem of order in a nonsequential world. Computers and Composition, 20(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carusi, A. (2006). Textual practitioners: A comparison of hypertext theory and phenomenology of reading. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 5(2), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, M. (2002). Click here to organize. Pedagogy, 2(2), 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. (2007). Challenging e-learning in the university: A literacies perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, B. (2000). Scholarly rhetoric in digital media. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/00/ingraham/ingraham-t.html/

  • Kolb, D. (1994). Socrates in the labyrinth. In G. P. Landow (Ed.), Hyper/Text/Theory (pp. 323–342). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (2008). The revenge of the page. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.dkolb.org/fp002.kolb.pdf

  • Kolb, D. (2004). Twin media. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http://www.dkolb.org/twin.media.ht04/covershe.html

  • Kress, G. (1982). Learning to write. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen. (2006). Reading images. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landow, G. (1997). Hypertext 2.0. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 11(3), 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T., & Turner, J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, C. (2005). Words, bridges and dialogue: Issues of audience and addressivity in online communication. In R. Land & S. Bayne (Ed.), Education in cyberspace (pp. 140–162). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. (1998). Elements and implications of a hypertext pedagogy. Computers and Education, 31(2), 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secker, J., Boden, D., & Price, G. (2007). The information literacy cookbook: Recipes for success. Oxford: Chandos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn Breivik, P., & Gee, E. G. (2006). Higher education in the Internet age: Libraries creating a strategic edge. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mckenna, C., Mcavinia, C. (2011). Difference and Discontinuity – Making Meaning Through Hypertexts. In: Land, R., Bayne, S. (eds) Digital Difference. Educational Futures Rethinking Theory and Practice, vol 50. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-580-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships