Abstract
Etymologically, distance comes from the Latin distāntia: ‘standing apart’, hence meanings of separation, distance, remoteness, difference, diversity. In daily life people or objects can be ‘placed at a distance’, ‘made to appear distant’, ‘kept distant from’, or ‘outrun’. In figurative speech distance expresses degrees of remoteness, as in ‘ideal disjunction, mental separation’. In interpersonal relations distance signifies detachment in interaction, ‘keeping and knowing one’s distance’, or simply an aloof or deferential attitude. In psychology it designates reactions for escaping engaging, in therapy and special education it is technique used to help with building identity and communication through symbols and referential language. In combat sports distancing is a technical terminus for the appropriate selection of distance between oneself and a combatant throughout an encounter. In dramatic art distancing may designate an aesthetic principle, delineating the boundaries of fiction and reality through the mental faculty referred to as psychic distance (Bullough), or it can be a description of a poetics, including uses of stylistic devices, such as rhetoric figures or distancing effects (Shklovsky, Brecht, Heathcote).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle. (1987). Poetics (R. Janko, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Aristotle. (2006). Retorikk [Rhetoric] (T. Eide, Trans. to Norwegian). Oslo: Vidarforlaget.
Bolton, G. (1984). Drama as education: An argument for placing drama at the centre of the curriculum. London: Longman.
Brecht, B. (1963a/1937). Zur Theorie des Lehrstücks. Schriften zum Theater, b. 4, 78–80. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Brecht, B. (1963b/1936). Episches theater, Entfremdung. Schriften zum Theater, b. 3, 196–197. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Brecht, B. (1963c/1939). Über Experimentelles Theater. Schriften zum Theater, b. 3, 79–106. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Brecht, B. (2001a/1936). Theatre for pleasure or theatre for instruction. In J. Willett (Ed. & Trans.).
Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (pp. 69–76). London: Methuen.
Brecht, B. (2001b/1940). Short description of a new technique of acting which produces an alienation effect. In J. Willett (Ed. & Trans.). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (pp. 136–147). London: Methuen.
Brecht, B. (2001c/1948). A short organum for the theatre. In J. Willett (Ed. & Trans.). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (pp. 179–205). London: Methuen.
Brecht, B. (2003/1930). Theory of pedagogies. In T. Kuhn & S. Giles (Eds.), Brecht on art & politics (pp. 88–89). London: Methuen.
Bullough, E. (1957/1912). ‘Psychical distance’ as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle. In E. M. Wilkinson (Ed.), Aesthetics: Lectures and essays by Edward Bullough (pp. 91–130). London: Bowes & Bowes.
Coleridge, S. T. (1817). Biographia literaria; or biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions. London: William Clowes. Retrieved August 29, 2009, from http://www.archive.org/stream/biographia litera00coleuoft#page/145/mode/1up
Diderot, D. (1883). The paradox of acting (W. H. Pollock, Trans.). London: Chatto & Windus.
Eriksson, S. A. (2009). Distancing at close range. Investigating the significance of distancing in drama education. Doctoral thesis. Vaasa: Åbo Academy University.
Grimm, R. (1972/1959). Bertolt Brecht: Die Struktur seines Werkes. Nürnberg: Verlag Hans Carl.
Heathcote, D. (1976). Of these seeds becoming. In R. B. Schuman (Ed.), Educational drama for today’s schools (pp. 1–40). New York: Scarecrow Press.
Heathcote, D. (1980). Drama as context. Dorothy Heathcote. In B. Myra (Ed.), NATE papers in education. Aberdeen University Press.
Heathcote, D. (1984). Considerations when working with mentally handicapped people. In L. Johnson & C. O’Neill (Eds.), Dorothy heathcote: Collected writings on education and drama (pp. 154–155). London: Hutchinson.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Preface: On scientific knowledge (J. B. Baillie, Trans.). In Hegel’s The phenomenology of mind. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20Phen/hegel_phen_preface.htm
Helmers, H. (Ed.). (1984). Verfremdung in der Literatur. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Kuhn, T., & Giles, S. (Eds.). (2003). Brecht on art and politics. London: Methuen.
Novalis. (1799/1846). Novalis Schriften. Dritter Theil. (T. Ludwig & E. v. Bülow Eds.). Berlin: Verlag von G. Reimer. Retrieved August 29, 2009, from http://books.google.com/books?id=dXkTAA AAYAAJ&pg=PP3&dq=novalis+schriften&lr=#v=one page&q=&f=false
Primavesi, P. (2005). Verfremdung. In E. Fischer-Lichte, D. Kolesch, & M. Warstat (Eds.), Metzler
Lexikon Theatertheorie (pp. 377–379). Stuttgart: Verlag J. B. Metzler.
Shelley, P. B. (1821/1840). A defence of poetry. In C. W. Eliot (Ed.), The harvard classics: The shelves
of fiction, XXVII. English Essays: Sidney to Macauly. New York: Bartleby. Retrieved February 14, 2009, from http://www.bartleby.com/27/23.html
Shklovsky, V. (1988/1917). Art as technique (L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis,Trans.). In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory: A reader (pp. 16–30). London: Longman.
Steinweg, R. (2005/1995). Lehrstück und Episches Theater: Brechts Theorie und die Theaterpädagogische Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Brandes & Apsel.
Willett, J. (1984). Brecht in context: Comparative approaches. London: Methuen.
Wright, E. (1989). Postmodern brecht: A re-presentation. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eriksson, S.A. (2011). Distancing. In: Schonmann, S. (eds) Key Concepts in Theatre/Drama Education. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-332-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-332-7_11
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-332-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)