Skip to main content

Abstract

Etymologically, distance comes from the Latin distāntia: ‘standing apart’, hence meanings of separation, distance, remoteness, difference, diversity. In daily life people or objects can be ‘placed at a distance’, ‘made to appear distant’, ‘kept distant from’, or ‘outrun’. In figurative speech distance expresses degrees of remoteness, as in ‘ideal disjunction, mental separation’. In interpersonal relations distance signifies detachment in interaction, ‘keeping and knowing one’s distance’, or simply an aloof or deferential attitude. In psychology it designates reactions for escaping engaging, in therapy and special education it is technique used to help with building identity and communication through symbols and referential language. In combat sports distancing is a technical terminus for the appropriate selection of distance between oneself and a combatant throughout an encounter. In dramatic art distancing may designate an aesthetic principle, delineating the boundaries of fiction and reality through the mental faculty referred to as psychic distance (Bullough), or it can be a description of a poetics, including uses of stylistic devices, such as rhetoric figures or distancing effects (Shklovsky, Brecht, Heathcote).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle. (1987). Poetics (R. Janko, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2006). Retorikk [Rhetoric] (T. Eide, Trans. to Norwegian). Oslo: Vidarforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. (1984). Drama as education: An argument for placing drama at the centre of the curriculum. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (1963a/1937). Zur Theorie des Lehrstücks. Schriften zum Theater, b. 4, 78–80. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (1963b/1936). Episches theater, Entfremdung. Schriften zum Theater, b. 3, 196–197. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (1963c/1939). Über Experimentelles Theater. Schriften zum Theater, b. 3, 79–106. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (2001a/1936). Theatre for pleasure or theatre for instruction. In J. Willett (Ed. & Trans.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (pp. 69–76). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (2001b/1940). Short description of a new technique of acting which produces an alienation effect. In J. Willett (Ed. & Trans.). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (pp. 136–147). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (2001c/1948). A short organum for the theatre. In J. Willett (Ed. & Trans.). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (pp. 179–205). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B. (2003/1930). Theory of pedagogies. In T. Kuhn & S. Giles (Eds.), Brecht on art & politics (pp. 88–89). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, E. (1957/1912). ‘Psychical distance’ as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle. In E. M. Wilkinson (Ed.), Aesthetics: Lectures and essays by Edward Bullough (pp. 91–130). London: Bowes & Bowes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, S. T. (1817). Biographia literaria; or biographical sketches of my literary life and opinions. London: William Clowes. Retrieved August 29, 2009, from http://www.archive.org/stream/biographia litera00coleuoft#page/145/mode/1up

  • Diderot, D. (1883). The paradox of acting (W. H. Pollock, Trans.). London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, S. A. (2009). Distancing at close range. Investigating the significance of distancing in drama education. Doctoral thesis. Vaasa: Åbo Academy University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, R. (1972/1959). Bertolt Brecht: Die Struktur seines Werkes. Nürnberg: Verlag Hans Carl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, D. (1976). Of these seeds becoming. In R. B. Schuman (Ed.), Educational drama for today’s schools (pp. 1–40). New York: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, D. (1980). Drama as context. Dorothy Heathcote. In B. Myra (Ed.), NATE papers in education. Aberdeen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, D. (1984). Considerations when working with mentally handicapped people. In L. Johnson & C. O’Neill (Eds.), Dorothy heathcote: Collected writings on education and drama (pp. 154–155). London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Preface: On scientific knowledge (J. B. Baillie, Trans.). In Hegel’s The phenomenology of mind. Retrieved October 21, 2008, from http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20Phen/hegel_phen_preface.htm

  • Helmers, H. (Ed.). (1984). Verfremdung in der Literatur. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T., & Giles, S. (Eds.). (2003). Brecht on art and politics. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novalis. (1799/1846). Novalis Schriften. Dritter Theil. (T. Ludwig & E. v. Bülow Eds.). Berlin: Verlag von G. Reimer. Retrieved August 29, 2009, from http://books.google.com/books?id=dXkTAA AAYAAJ&pg=PP3&dq=novalis+schriften&lr=#v=one page&q=&f=false

  • Primavesi, P. (2005). Verfremdung. In E. Fischer-Lichte, D. Kolesch, & M. Warstat (Eds.), Metzler

    Google Scholar 

  • Lexikon Theatertheorie (pp. 377–379). Stuttgart: Verlag J. B. Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, P. B. (1821/1840). A defence of poetry. In C. W. Eliot (Ed.), The harvard classics: The shelves

    Google Scholar 

  • of fiction, XXVII. English Essays: Sidney to Macauly. New York: Bartleby. Retrieved February 14, 2009, from http://www.bartleby.com/27/23.html

  • Shklovsky, V. (1988/1917). Art as technique (L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis,Trans.). In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory: A reader (pp. 16–30). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinweg, R. (2005/1995). Lehrstück und Episches Theater: Brechts Theorie und die Theaterpädagogische Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Brandes & Apsel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. (1984). Brecht in context: Comparative approaches. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. (1989). Postmodern brecht: A re-presentation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eriksson, S.A. (2011). Distancing. In: Schonmann, S. (eds) Key Concepts in Theatre/Drama Education. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-332-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships