Abstract
Grid-based distributed hydrologic models rely on a drainage network to model basin response. A digital elevation model (DEM) is useful for characterizing the terrain and drainage network. Processing steps and DEM cell size affect the land surface slope, drainage network length and connectivity properties. Derived drainage networks and the hydraulic parameters used to represent the conveyance of runoff to the outlet of the river basin are dependent on cell size and on the methods used to derive the drainage network. Once the drainage network is defined and slope derived, the remaining hydraulic parameters are applied to overland and channel cells, which may require adjustment. The characteristics of the extracted drainage network can influence hydrologic model calibration and performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chang, K., and B. Tsai. 1991. The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 18(1): 69–77.
Farajalla, N.S., and B.E. Vieux. 1995. Capturing the essential spatial variability in distributed hydrologic modeling: Infiltration parameters. Journal of Hydrological Processes 8(1): 55–68.
Fern, A., M.T. Musavi, and J. Miranda. 1998. Automatic extraction of drainage network from digital terrain al network approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 36(3): 1007–1015.
Freeman, T.G. 1991. Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid. Computers & Geosciences 17(3): 413–422.
Garbrecht, J., and H.W. Shen. 1988. The physical framework of the dependence between channel flow hydrographs and drainage network morphometry. Journal of Hydrological Processes 2(337): 355.
Goodchild, M.F. 1980. Fractals and the Accuracy of Geographical Measures. Mathematical Geology 12(2): 85.
Goodchild, M.F., and D.M. Mark. 1987. The fractal nature of geographic phenomena. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77(2): 265–278.
Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T. 1988. Fractals and the River-Length Catchment-Area Ratio. Water Resources Bulletin 24(2): 455–459.
Huang, J., and D.L. Turcotte. 1989. Fractal mapping of digitized images: Application to the topography of Arizona and comparisons with synthetic images. Journal of Geophysical Research 94(B6): 7491–7495.
Hutchinson, M.F. 1989. A New Procedure for Gridding Elevation and Stream Line Data with Automated Removal of Spurious Pits. Journal of Hydrology 106: 211–232.
Jenson, S.K. 1985. Automated derivation of hydrologic basin characteristics from digital elevation model data. Proceedings of Auto-Carto 7—Digital Representation of Spatial Knowledge, 301–310. Washington D.C.
Jenson, S.K. 1991. Applications of Hydrologic Information Automatically Extracted from Digital Elevation Models. In: Analysis and distributed modeling in hydrology, eds. Beven, K.J. and Moore, I.D. Terrain, 35–48. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
Jenson, S.K., and J.O. Dominique. 1988. extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 54(11): 1593–1600.
La Barbera, P.L., and R. Rosso. 1989. On the fractal dimension of stream networks. Water Resources Research 25(4): 735–741.
Lee, J., K. Snyder, and P.F. Fisher. 1992. Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 58: 1461–1467.
Lee, J., and C.-J. Chu. 1996. Spatial structures of digital terrain models and hydrological feature extraction. IAHS Publ. No. 235.
Martz, L.W., and J. Garbrecht. 1992. Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models. Computers & Geosciences 18(6): 747–761.
Moore, I.D., and R.B. Grayson. 1991. Terrain-based catchment partitioning and runoff prediction using vector elevation data. Water Resources Research 27(6): 1177–1191.
O’Callaghan, J.F., and D.M. Mark. 1984. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 28: 323–344.
Qian, J., W. Ehrich, and J.B. Campbell. 1990. DNESYS—An expert system for automatic extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 28: 29–44.
Quinn, P., K. Beven, P. Chevallier, and O. Planchon. 1991. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models. In Terrain analysis and distributed modeling in hydrology, ed. K.J. Beven, and I.D. Moore, 63–83. Chichester, U.K: John Wiley and Sons.
Robert, A., and A.G. Roy. 1990. On the fractal interpretation of the mainstream length-drainage area relationship. Water Resources Research 26(5): 839–842.
Tarboton, D.G., R.L. Bras, and I.R. Iturbé. 1988. The fractal nature of river networks. Water Resources Research 24(8): 1317–1322.
Tarboton, D.G., R.L. Bras, and I.R. Iturbe. 1989. Scaling and elevation in river networks. Water Resources Research 25(9): 2037–2051.
Tarboton, D.G., R.L. Bras, and I.R. Iturbe. 1991. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. In Terrain analysis and distributed modeling in hydrology, ed. K.J. Beven, and I.D. Moore, 85–104. York: John Wiley, New.
Tarboton, D.G., and M.E. Baker. 2008. Towards an algebra for terrain-based flow analysis. In Representing, modeling and visualizing the natural environment: Innovations in GIS 13, ed. N.J. Mount, G.L. Harvey, P. Aplin, and G. Priestnall, 167–194. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Tesfa, T.K.David, G. Tarboton, Daniel W. Watson, Kimberly A.T. Schreuders, Matthew E. Baker, and Robert M. Wallace. 2011. Extraction of hydrological proximity measures from DEMs using parallel processing. Environmental Modelling and Software 26(12): 1696–1709. ISSN 1364-8152.
Vieux, B.E. 1988. Finite Element Analysis of Hydrologic Response Areas Using Geographic Information Systems. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Vieux, B.E. 1993. DEM aggregation and smoothing effects on surface runoff modeling. ASCE, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Special Issue on Geographic Information Analysis 7(3): 310–338.
Vieux, B.E., and N.S. Farajalla. 1994. Capturing the essential spatial variability in distributed hydrological modeling: hydraulic roughness. Journal of Hydrological Processes 8: 221–236.
Vieux, B.E., and S. Needham. 1993. Nonpoint-Pollution Model Sensitivity to Grid-Cell Size. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 119(2): 141–157.
Vieux, B.E., C. Chen, J.E. Vieux, and K.W. Howard. 2003. Operational deployment of a physics-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for flood forecasting in Taiwan. In: Proceedings, Weather Radar Information and Distributed Hydrological Modelling, IAHS General Assembly at Sapporo, Japan, July 3–11, eds. Tachikawa, B. Vieux, K.P. Georgakakos, and E. Nakakita, IAHS Red Book Publication No. 282: 251–257.
Wilson, J.P. 2012. Digital terrain modeling. Geomorphology 137(1): 107–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vieux, B.E. (2016). Watersheds and Drainage Networks. In: Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0930-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0930-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0928-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0930-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)