Skip to main content

Identification with the Relationship as Essential to Marital Resilience: Theory, Application, and Evidence

  • Chapter
Couple Resilience

Abstract

The secret to marital longevity is good maintenance of the essence of a marriage. That essence is a complex process at the core of the relationship that allows for continuing adaptation to the vicissitudes of life the partners experience. Findings from a 15-year research program with guided participation of married partners examining their marital dynamics, finds that enhancing their sense of “we-ness” at a personal level is crucial for enhancing the essence of the marriage, with marital satisfaction being the result. The enhanced “we-ness” likely feeds the improvement of an implicit meta-cognitive relational awareness of being a dynamic close relationship with which the couple can navigate, cope and remain resilient. The multi-modal Systemic-Constructivist Couple Therapy (SCCT), derived from the longitudinal in-depth marital research, is used to map onto any couple’s relational dynamics as a means to investigate and enhance marital functioning. That enhancement accompanies each partner’s gaining a greater sense of “we-ness.” Theoretical explanation with clinically derived examples and research findings are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, G., Salter, P. S., Pickett, K. M., Kurtis, T., & Phillips, N. L. (2010). Behavior as mind in context. In B. Mewquita, L. F. Barrett, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 277–306). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2011). Divorce therapy. In J. L. Wetchler (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (pp. 165–187). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S., & Reid, D. (2008). Relationship satisfaction among South Asian Canadians: The role of ‘complementary-equality’ and listening to understand. Interpersona, 2, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S., & Reid, D. (2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of systemic-constructivist couple Therapy (SCCT) with distressed South Asian couples. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Shon, D. (1989). Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. The American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 612–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W. (Ed.). (2005). Interpersonal cognition. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (Ed.). (2007). Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Self-regulation and the executive function of the self. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 180–197). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, J. S. (2012). A social neuroscience perspective on the self. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 638–655). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, R. J. (2011). The state of couple therapy. In J. L. Wetchler (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenmann, G. (2010). New themes in couple therapy: The role of stress, coping and social support. In K. Hahlweg, M. Grawe-Gerber, & D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Enhancing couples: The shape of couple therapy to come (pp. 142–156). Toronto, ON, Canada: Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 151–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2013). Handbook for participatory action research, planning and evaluation. SAS2 Dialogue, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Also available at Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, K. J. (2013). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Routledge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. (1998). On intervention and relationship events: A marital therapist looks at longitudinal research on marriage. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp. 377–392). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (2008). Intuition from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 23–37). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, B. C. (2007). The dependency paradox in close relationships: Accepting dependence promotes independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 268–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877–889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. J. O., & Fitness, J. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. C., & Frith, U. (2012). Mechanisms of social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 287–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 1(1), 49–72. http://www.anecdote.com.au/papers/EmergenceAsAConsutructIssue1_1_3.pdf

  • Hahlweg, K., Baucom, D. H., Grawe-Gerber, M., & Snyder, D. K. (2010). Strengthening couples and families: Dissemination of interventions for the treatment and prevention of couple distress. In K. Hahlweg, M. Grawe-Gerber, & D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Enhancing couples: The shape of couple therapy to come (pp. 3–29). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, L. V. (2010). Epigenetic inheritance. In B. Mesquita, L. F. Barrett, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 25–41). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, W. K. (2011). Marriage and relationship education: What works and how to provide it. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertlein, K. M., & Weeks, G. R. (2011). The field of infidelity: Past, present, and future. In J. L. Wetchler (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (pp. 145–161). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2), 213–218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W. (Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Christensen, A. (1996). Integrative couple therapy: Promoting acceptance and change. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. J. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Toronto, ON, Canada: Doubleday Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, Z., Petronis, A., Wang, S., Levine, B., Ghaffar, O., Floden, D., et al. (2008). Epigenetics of personality traits: An illustrative study of identical twins discordant for risk-taking behavior. Twin Research Human Genetics, 11(1), 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karney, B., & Bradbury, T. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. (2002). Introduction. In J. Kaufman (Ed.), Loss of the assumptive world: A theory of traumatic loss (pp. 1–12). New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. L., & Halford, W. K. (2011). One size does not fit all: Customizing couple relationship education for unique couple needs. In J. L. Wetchler (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (pp. 293–309). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Tangney, J. P. (2012). The self as an organizing construct in the behavioral and social sciences. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 1–18). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luborsky, L. (1996). The symptom-context method: Symptoms as opportunities in psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, B. (2007). Evolutionary psychology, complex systems, and social theory. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 90(3/4), 169–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. B., Hollist, C. S., Olsen, J., & Law, D. (2013). Marital quality and health over 20 years: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 667–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morf, C. C., & Mischel, W. (2012). The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: Toward a converging science of selfhood. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 21–49). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, L. A., & Broady, E. F. (2011). Stress resilience in early marriage: Can practice make perfect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1050–1067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R. A. (2009). Constructivist psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. (2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 69–104).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, S. S., & Thomas, V. (2011). Awareness of culture: Clinical implications for couple therapy. In J. L. Wetchler (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (pp. 207–224).

    Google Scholar 

  • Random House Dictionary of the English Language (College Ed.). (1968). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. W. (1995). Couples self awareness questionnaire. Unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. W., Dalton, E. J., Laderoute, K., Doell, F. K., & Nguyen, T. (2006). Therapeutically induced changes in couple identity: The role of we-ness and interpersonal processing in relationship satisfaction. Genetic, Social and General Psychological Monographs, 132, 241–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. W., Dalton, J., & Doell, F. K. (in preparation). Enhancing interpersonal processing as the therapeutic change mechanism in couple therapy: Evidence from a longitudinal study of referred couples. Manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. W., Doell, F., Dalton, J., & Ahmad, S. (2008). Systemic constructivist couple therapy (SCCT): Description of approach, theoretical advances, and published longitudinal evidence. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45, 477–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. W., & McKim, L. (2013) Psychometric evaluation of the mutuality questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. W. (2011). Brain biology and couple therapy. In J. Wetchler (Ed.), Handbook of clinical issues in couple therapy (pp. 23–40). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2012). Multiple identities within a single self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization within contexts and cultures. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 225–246). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarvalone, P., Fox, M., & Safran, J. D. (2010). Interpersonal Schemes: Clinical theory, research, and implications. In M. W. Baldwin (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 359–387). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenborn, C. A. (2004). Marital status and health: United States, 1999–2002, Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, Number 351. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Centre for Health Statistics, 3311, Toledo road, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42(1), 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Reid Ph.D., C.Psych. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reid, D.W., Ahmad, S. (2015). Identification with the Relationship as Essential to Marital Resilience: Theory, Application, and Evidence. In: Skerrett, K., Fergus, K. (eds) Couple Resilience. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics