Skip to main content

Assessing the Finance and Economics of Resource Recovery and Reuse Solutions Across Scales

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wastewater

Abstract

The recovery and reuse of wastewater can contribute to reducing poverty, improving food security, improving nutrition and health, and managing natural resources more sustainability to protect ecosystems and build climate resilient communities. Reusing wastewater generates both private and public benefits, yet care must be taken to minimize environmental harm and risks to human health. Assessing the costs and benefits of wastewater use is challenging for decision making. Financial analysis of wastewater and other reuse options can underpin decision making from a business standpoint, and economic analysis provides the information needed to support public policy decisions. In this chapter, we provide a framework for assessing the finance and economics of wastewater and other reuse options. We examine several components of resource recovery and reuse, including water reuse, energy recovery, and nutrient capture from wastewater as well as fecal sludge and biosolids. We describe the cost-savings and partial cost-recovery made possible by wastewater use and we discuss value propositions for possible business models. Many water reuse solutions do not achieve financial cost recovery but are viable from an economic perspective. However, public agencies can enhance revenue streams by supporting more than water recovery and/or by targeting high-end users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abu-Madi M, Al-Sa’ed R, Braadbaart O, Alaerts G (2008) Viability of increasing the tariff of freshwater for irrigation as a tool to stimulate wastewater reuse in the MENA region. Water Sci Technol 57(9):1475–1481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agunwamba JC (2001) Analysis of socioeconomic and environmental impacts of waste stablization pond and unrestricted wastewater irrigation: interface with maintenance. Environ Manage 27(3):463–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AQUAREC (2006) Handbook on feasibility studies for water reuse systems, integrated concepts for reuse of upgraded wastewater, EESD Programme. European Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Asano T (2002) Water from (waste)water—the dependable water resource (The 2001 Stockholm Water Prize Laureate Lecture). Water Sci Technol 45(8):23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Asano T, Levine AD (1996) Wastewater reclamation, recycling and reuse: past, present, and future. Water Sci Technol 33(10–11):1–14. (Special issue)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Koundouri P, Kountouris Y (2008) Evaluating farmers’ preferences for wastewater: quantity and quality aspects. International J Water 4(1/2):69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson R, Hanemann WM, Kopp RJ, Smith VK et al (1997) Testing the temporal reliability from contingent valuation. Land Econ 73(2):151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolnicar S, Schäfer AI (2009) Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. J Environ Manage 90(2):888–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreizin Y (2007) Wastewater reuse—risk assessment: the Israeli Case Study. Water Commission, Israel

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldlite M, Juanicó M, Karplus I, Milstein A (2008) Towards a safe standard for heavy metals in reclaimed water used for fish aquaculture. Aquaculture 284:115–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant SB, Saphores J-D, Feldman DL, Hamilton AJ, Fletcher TD, Cook PLM, Stewardson M, Sanders BF, Levin LA, Ambrose RF, Deletic A, Brown R, Jiang SC, Rosso D, Cooper WJ, Marusic I (2012) Taking the “Waste” out of “Wastewater” for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science 337(6095):681–686. doi:10.1126/science.1216852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GWI (2009) Municipal water reuse markets 2010. Global Water Intelligence, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanjra MA, Blackwell J, Carr G, Zhang F, Jackson TM (2011) Wastewater irrigation and environmental health: implications for water governance and public policy. Int J Hyg Environ Health 215(3):255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq G, Cambridge H (2012) Exploiting the co-benefits of ecological sanitation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(4):431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haruvy N, Shalhevet S, Bachmat Y (2008) A model for integrated water resources management in water-scarce regions: irrigation with wastewater combined with desalination processes. Int J Water 4(1/2):25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández F, Urkiaga A, De las Fuentes L, Bis B, Chiru E, Balazs B, Wintgens T (2006) Feasibility studies for water reuse projects: an economical approach. Desalination 187(1–3):253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain I, Raschid L, Hanjra MA, Marikar F, van der Hoek W (2001) A framework for analyzing socioeconomic, health and environmental impacts of wastewater use in agriculture in developing countries, Working Paper 26, Colombo, Sri Lanka, International Water Management Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain I, Raschid L, Hanjra MA, Marikar F, Van Der Hoek W (2002) Wastewater use in agriculture: review of impacts and methodological issues in valuing impacts. (With an extended list of bibliographical references). Working Paper 37, Colombo, Sri Lanka, International Water Management Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson TM, Hanjra MA, Khan S, Hafeez MM (2011) Building a climate resilient farm: a risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture. Agric Syst 104(9):729–745. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2011.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalavrouziotis IK, Robolas P, Koukoulakis PH, Papadopoulos AH (2008) Effects of municipal reclaimed wastewater on the macro- and micro-elements status of soil and of Brassica oleracea var. Italica, and B. oleracea var. Gemmifera. Agric Water Manage 95:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampas P, Parsons SA, Pearce P, Ledoux S, Vale P, Churchley J, Cartmell E (2007) Mechanical sludge disintegration for the production of carbon source for biological nutrient removal. Water Res 41(8):1734–1742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karak T, Bhattacharyya P (2011) Human urine as a source of alternative natural fertilizer in agriculture: a flight of fancy or an achievable reality. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(4):400–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmia AA, Tyagia K, Trivedi RC, Kumar A (2008) Coliforms removal in full-scale activated sludge plants in India. J Environ Manage 87:415–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keraita B, Drachsel P, Seidu R, Amerasinghe P, Olufunke CO, Konradsen F (2010) Harnessing farmers’ knowledge and perceptions for health-risk reduction in wastewater-irrigated agriculture. In: Drechsel P, Scott CA, Raschid-Sally L, Redwood M, Bahri A (eds) Wastewater irrigation and health. Assessing and mitigating risk in low-income countries. Earthscan/IWMI/IDRC, Ottawa, pp 337–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Cao Q, Zheng YM, Huang YZ, Zhu YG (2008) Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 152:686–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko J-Y, Day JW, Lane RR, Day JN (2004) A comparative evaluation of money-based and energy-based cost–benefit analyses of tertiary municipal wastewater treatment using forested wetlands vs. sand filtration in Louisiana. Ecol Econ 49(3):331–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawhon P, Schwartz M (2006) Linking environmental and economic sustainability in establishing standards for wastewater re-use in Israel. Water Sci Technol 53:203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Wang X, Allinson G, Li X, Xiong X (2009) Risk assessment of heavy metals in soil previously irrigated with industrial wastewater in Shenyang, China. J Hazard Mater 161:516–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin M, Olofsson M, Pettersson GJ, Zetterlund H (2004) Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge handling options. Resour Conserv Recycl 41(4):255–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manage 90(1):652–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegaki AN, Mellon RC, Vrentzou A, Koumakis G, Tsagarakis KP (2008) What’s in a name: framing treated wastewater as recycled water increases willingness to use and willingness to pay. J Econ Psychol. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2008.1008.1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihelcic JR, Fry LM, Shaw R (2011) Global potential of phosphorus recovery from human urine and feces. Chemosphere 84(6):832–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mo W, Zhang Q (2013) Energy-nutrients-water nexus: integrated resource recovery in municipal wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Manage 127:255–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2011) Cost-benefit analysis of water-reuse projects for environmental purposes: a case study for Spanish wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Manage 92(12):3091–3097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Reif R, Garrido-Baserba M, Hernández-Sancho F, Omil F, Poch M, Sala-Garrido R (2013) Economic valuation of environmental benefits of removing pharmaceutical and personal care products from WWTP effluents by ozonation. Sci Total Environ 461–462(0):409–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Berkoff J (2006) Cities versus agriculture: revisiting intersectoral water transfers, potential gains and conflicts. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Comprehensive Assessment Secretariat. vi, 70 p. (Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Research Report 010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogueira SF, Pereira BFF, Gomes TM, de Paula AM, dos Santos JA, Montes CR (2013) Treated sewage effluent: agronomical and economical aspects on bermudagrass production. Agric Water Manage 116(1):151–159. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir M, Wichelns D, Raschid-Sally L, McCornick PG, Drechsel P, Bahri A, Minhas PS (2010) The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. Agric Water Manage 97(4):561–568. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roma E, Benoit N, Buckley C, Bell S (2013) Using the Receptivity model to uncover ‘urine blindness’: perceptions on the re-use of urine. Waste Manage Res 31(6):648–654. doi:10.1177/0734242x13482160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rong-guang S, Sheng-wei P, Yue-hua W, Hao Z, Yu-jie Z, Feng-zhi L, Qi-xing Z (2008) Countermeasures of reclaimed municipal wastewater for safety of agricultural use in China. Agric Sci China 7(11):1365–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowski T, Raschid-Sally L, Buechler S (2007) Wastewater irrigation in the developing world—two case studies from the Kathmandu Valley in Nepal. Agric Water Manage 88:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith T (2011) Overcoming challenges in wastewater reuse: a case study of San Antonio. Texas. Thesis presented to Harvard College Cambridge, Mass, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • SPC (2012) Environmental & social impact assessment study for the expansion of As-Samra wastewater treatment plant FINAL ESIA REPORT, Samra Wastewater Treatment Plant Company (SPC), Jordan

    Google Scholar 

  • Toze S (2006) Reuse of effluent water—benefits and risks. Agric Water Manage 80:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis KP, Tsoumanis P, Chartzoulakis K, Angelakis AN (2001) Water resources status including wastewater treatment and reuse in Greece—related problems and prospectives. Water Int 26(2):252–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tziakis I, Pachiadakis I, Moraitakis M, Xideas K, Theologis G, Tsagarakis KP (2009) Valuing benefits from wastewater treatment and reuse using contingent valuation methodology. Desalination 237(1–3):117–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2006) Clean development mechanism, project design document. CDM-PDD, Version 03, 28 July 2006, UNFCCC

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Water (2014) A post 2015 global goal for water, synthesis of key findings and recommendation form UN-Water, 27 Jan 2014, UN-Water

    Google Scholar 

  • Urkiaga A, de las Fuentes L, Bis B, Chiru E, Balasz B, Hernándeze F (2008) Development of analysis tools for social, economic and ecological effects of water reuse. Desalination 218:81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker C, Lin HS (2008) Soil property changes after four decades of wastewater irrigation: a landscape perspective. Catena 73:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward FA (2007) Decision support for water policy: a review of economic concepts and tools. Water Policy 9(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WateReuse Research Foundation (2006) An economic framework for evaluating the benefits and costs of water reuse. Final Project Report and User Guidance. WateReuse Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldesilassie AB, Amerasinghe P, Danso G (2011) Assessing the empirical challenges of evaluating the benefits and risks of irrigating with wastewater. Water Int 36(4):441–454. doi:10.1080/02508060.2011.595056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichelns D, Drechsel P (2011) Meeting the challenge of wastewater irrigation: economics, finance, business opportunities and methodological constraints. Water Int 36(4):415–419. doi:10.1080/02508060.2011.593732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winpenny J, Heinz I, Koo-Oshima S (2010) The wealth of waste: the economics of wastewater use in agriculture. FAO Water Reports 35, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munir A. Hanjra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanjra, M., Drechsel, P., Mateo-Sagasta, J., Otoo, M., Hernández-Sancho, F. (2015). Assessing the Finance and Economics of Resource Recovery and Reuse Solutions Across Scales. In: Drechsel, P., Qadir, M., Wichelns, D. (eds) Wastewater. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9545-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics