Abstract
Dress that is understood to be religiously defined is presumed to be the opposite of fashion, to be spatially and temporally apart from the fast changing individuating global trends that characterize modernity. It is also presumed that religious cultures that require or encourage versions of modest dressing and body management are motivated by shame. These presumptions are challenged by the development in the mid-2000s of a new niche market for modest fashion that crosses the three Abrahamic faiths and that works internationally. The potential cost-savings of e-commerce allows many niche markets to grow. The field of modest fashion online is characterized by a mixture of commerce and commentary with an active blogosphere and social media providing opportunities along with entrepreneurship for a women-led discourse about fashion, modesty, and the body. This chapter uses the framework of internet commerce and communications to de-exceptionalize religious clothing cultures and place them within the wider consideration of how shame impacts fashion as an embodied practice, repositioning shame as one among other considerations that factor into the current explosion of creativity in modest fashion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Lewis (2012). I am grateful to the editor for permission to reproduce. See www.vestoj.com.
- 2.
Modest Dressing: Faith-based fashion and internet retail is part of the Religion and Society Programme funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Board and the Economic and Social Science Research Board. The project is based at the London College of Fashion, and included as co-investigator Emma Tarlo and as postdoctoral researcher Jane Cameron. See: www.fashion.arts.ac.uk/modest-dressing.htm
- 3.
This research did not focus on the dress cultures of religious groups like the Amish whose forms of clothing (and its production) are intended to signal separation from contemporary fashion cultures and the mainstream society with which they are associated.
- 4.
I have previously considered shame in relation to the formation of imperial and postcolonial ethnic and religious identities, Lewis (2004: ch4).
References
Ahmed, L. (2011). A quiet revolution: The veil’s resurgence from the Middle East to America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ali, N., & Bodrul, O. (2007, 23 October). Personal interview, London.
Butler, J. (1993). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Cameron, J. (2013). Modest motivations: Religious/secular contestation in the fashion field (pp. 137–157). In R. Lewis (Ed.), Modest fashion: Styling bodies, mediating faith. London: IB Tauris.
Clarke, D. (1993). Commodity lesbianism. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 186–201). London: Routledge.
Duits, L., & van Zoonen, L. (2006). Headscarves and porno-chic: Disciplining girls’ bodies in the European multicultural society. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(2), 103–117.
Dwyer, C. (1999). Veiled meanings: Young British Muslim women and the negotiation of differences. Gender, Place and Culture, 6, 5–26.
Gole, N. (2011). Islam in Europe: The lure of fundamentalism and the allure of cosmopolitanism. Princeton: Markus Wiener.
Grewal, I. (2005). Transnational America feminisms, diasporas, neoliberalisms. Durham: Duke University Press.
Kariapper, A. S. (2009). Walking a tightrope: Women and veiling in the United Kingdom. London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.
Kossaibati, J. (2010, October 14). Personal interview, London.
Leach, W. (1980). True love and perfect union: The feminist reform of sex and society. New York: Basic Books.
Lewis, R. (2004). Rethinking orientalism: Women, travel and the Ottoman harem. London: I.B. Tauris.
Lewis, R. (2010). Marketing Muslim lifestyle: A new media genre. Journal of Middle East Gender Studies, 6(3), 58–90.
Lewis, R. (2012). Styling modesty. Vestoj (3), 210–224.
Lewis, R. (2013). Establishing reputation, maintaining independence: The modest fashion blogosphere (Chapter 14). In D. Bartlett, S. Cole, & A. Rocamora (Eds.), Fashion media. New York: Bloomsbury.
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roy, O. (2004). Globalised Islam: The search for a new Ummah. London: Hurst.
Sandıkcı, Ö., & Ger, G. (2010). Veiling in style: How does a stigmatized practice become fashionable? Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 15–36.
Schlafrig, M. (2010, July 13). Personal interview, New York.
Scott, J. W. (2007). The politics of the veil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sedgewick, E. K. (1993). Queer performativity: Henry James’s The art of the Novel. GLQ, 1(1), 1–16.
Slade, S. (2010, July 8). Personal interview, Orem, Utah.
Tajima-Simpson, H. (2010, 3 November). Personal interview, London.
Tarlo, E. (2010). Visibly Muslim: Fashion, politics, faith. Oxford: Berg.
Tarlo, E. (2013). Meeting through modesty: Jewish-Muslim encounters on the internet. In R. Lewis (Ed.), Modest fashion: Styling bodies, mediating faith (pp. 67–90). London: IB Tauris.
Temporal, P. (2011). The future of Islamic branding and marketing. In Ö. Sandıkı & G. Rice (Eds.), Handbook of Islamic marketing (pp. 465–483). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Werbner, P. (2007). Veiled interpretations in pure space: Honour, shame and embodied struggles among Muslims in Britain and France. Theory, Culture and Society, 24(2), 161–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, R. (2015). Fashion, Shame and Pride: Constructing the Modest Fashion Industry in Three Faiths. In: Brunn, S. (eds) The Changing World Religion Map. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_136
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_136
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9375-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9376-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)