Skip to main content

Ibn Khaldun: Law and Justice in the Science of Civilisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Justice

Part of the book series: Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey ((COPH,volume 12))

Abstract

Islam and religious law are inextricably intertwined. The concept of justice within the Islamic tradition is also indivisibly connected to revelation and the religious law. The philosophers within the Islamic tradition who explored justice have started from these premises. Therefore, the major classical divisions of philosophy do not easily fit the way these philosophers approached the subject of law and justice. Nevertheless, it is possible to have a closer look at these concepts from a philosophical perspective. The aim of this chapter is to do so through a study of the position(s) of Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406). – Ibn Khaldun should be counted amongst the important thinkers in historiography and the social sciences. Within his grand theory of the rise and fall of civilisations in his major work, al-Muqaddima, there are also a political theory and theories of law and justice. His ideas deserve scrutiny because his work is not yet presented in the standard philosophy and sociology curricula of Western universities. Yet, Ibn Khaldun’s ideas are important in the history of philosophy and ideas. – While Ibn Khaldun was an original thinker when preoccupied with the function of law and justice when he described their importance to the development of society, his notions of the content of justice and law was comprehensively Islamic. He was, after all, trained in fiqh and practiced as Chief Qadi in Cairo towards the end of his life. The social function of law and justice is to ensure a stable social order, which is necessary for sedentary civilisations to grow. The content of the religious, i.e., Islamic, law is there to ensure not only a stable social order, but also to ensure the salvation of the believers and guarantee them a blissful afterlife. – These two aspects of law and justice were interrelated in Ibn Khaldun’s thinking. By pointing out the function of law in social and historical processes, Ibn Khaldun also advocated an instrumental approach to be adopted by rulers who need to ensure stability. However, his normative position is also clear in his insistence on the religious law, i.e., shari‘a, as the only law—when implemented without corruption and favouritism—that will ensure the interests of ruler and subjects alike. – Within Ibn Khaldun’s new science of civilisation, his theories on law and justice make up a consistent whole, combing scientific analysis and values or a descriptive method with a normative position, both approaches rooted in his Islamic beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Flew , Antony (ed.) (1979) A Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Pan Books, p. 148.

  2. 2.

    Many translations into different languages exist. The quotations in this chapter are from Ibn Khaldun, Al-Muqaddimah (trans. by Franz Rosenthal , ed. and abridged by N. J. Dawood ), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969/5th printing 1981.

  3. 3.

    Ibn Khaldun, Al-Muqaddimah, p. 8.

  4. 4.

    Ibid, p. 24.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    N. J. Dawood , “Introduction”, in Ibn Khaldun, op. cit., pp. x–xi; cf. also Ingvar Rydberg , “Översettarens inledning”, in Ibn Khaldun, Prelogomena, Lund: Alhambra, 1989, p. 12.

  7. 7.

    Al-Azmeh , Aziz (1990) Ibn Khaldun. London/New York: Routledge, p. 135 (note 1).

  8. 8.

    Ibid, p. 27.

  9. 9.

    Rydberg , Ingvar (1989) “Översettarens inledning,” in Ibn Khaldun Prelogomena. Lund: Al-hambra, p. 13.

  10. 10.

    Al-Azmeh , op. cit., passim.

  11. 11.

    For an interesting discussion of this theme, see Al-Azmeh , Aziz (1981) Ibn Khaldun in Modern Scholarship – A Study in Orientalism. London: Third World Centre for Research and Publishing; a briefer introduction can be found in Gule , Lars (2003) Social Development and Political Progress in Two Traditions. Larvik: Ariadne, pp. 172–189 and 240–248.

  12. 12.

    Ibn Khaldun, op. cit., p. 136.

  13. 13.

    Ibid, p. 45.

  14. 14.

    Ibid, p. 47.

  15. 15.

    Ibid, p. 109.

  16. 16.

    Ibid, p. 123.

  17. 17.

    Ibid.

  18. 18.

    Ibid, p. 124.

  19. 19.

    Ibid, p. 125.

  20. 20.

    Ibid.

  21. 21.

    Ibid, p. 128.

  22. 22.

    Ibid, p. 130.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    Ibid, p. 132.

  25. 25.

    Ibid, p. 133.

  26. 26.

    Ibid.

  27. 27.

    Ibid, p. 134.

  28. 28.

    Ibid, p. 135.

  29. 29.

    Ibid, p. 138.

  30. 30.

    Ibid.

  31. 31.

    Ibid, p. 289.

  32. 32.

    Ibid, p. 291.

  33. 33.

    Ibid.

  34. 34.

    This is different from a view on moral and immoral forms of authority, cf. Black , Antony (2001) The History of Islamic Political Thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 174–177, and below, “The political thought of Ibn Khaldun”.

  35. 35.

    Ibn Khaldun, op. cit., p. 97.

  36. 36.

    Ibid, p. 111.

  37. 37.

    Ibid, p. 94.

  38. 38.

    Ibid, p. 95.

  39. 39.

    Ibid, p. 94.

  40. 40.

    Ibid, p. 286.

  41. 41.

    Ibid.

  42. 42.

    Ibid, p. 287.

  43. 43.

    Rosenthal , Erwin I. J. (1940) “Ibn Khaldun: A North African Muslim Thinker of the fourteenth century,” in Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 309; quoted after the reprint in Rosenthal, Studia Semitica, vol. II: Islamic Themes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971, p. 5.

  44. 44.

    See Mahdi , Mushim (2004) “Ibn Khaldun,” in Sharif , M. M. (ed.) (2004) A History of Muslim Philosophy. Delhi: Low Price Publications, vol. 2, p. 964.

  45. 45.

    Ibn Khaldun, op. cit., p. 154.

  46. 46.

    Ibid.

  47. 47.

    Ibid, p. 155.

  48. 48.

    Ibid; see also Khadduri , Majid (1984) The Islamic Conception of Justice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, p. 187.

  49. 49.

    Ibid, p. 40.

  50. 50.

    Ibid, p. 95.

  51. 51.

    Ibid, pp. 95–96.

  52. 52.

    Ibid.

  53. 53.

    Ibid.

  54. 54.

    Ibid.

  55. 55.

    Ibid, pp. 96–97.

  56. 56.

    For the following, see Calder , Norman (1998) “Islamic philosophy of law,” in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ip/rep/H015.htm; Rahemtulla , Shadaab (2012) “Justice,” in Bowering , Gerhard (ed.) Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press; and Mensia , Moqdad Arfa & Mensia , Mongia Arfa (2012) “Islamic Philosophy of Law,” in Berry Gray, Christopher (ed.) The Philosophy of Law. An Encyclopedia. New York: Routledge.

  57. 57.

    See Calder , op. cit.

  58. 58.

    For a further discussion of these concepts and usul al-fiqh , see Calder , op. cit.; Vikør , Knut S. “Sharia” from Oxford Islamic Studies Online”, December 16, 2013, http://bridgingcultures.neh.gov/muslimjourneys/items/show/226; and Vikør (2005) Between God and the Sultan: A History of Islamic Law. London: Hurst.

  59. 59.

    Calder , op. cit.

  60. 60.

    Ibn Khaldun, op. cit., pp. 344–45.

  61. 61.

    See Gule , op. cit., p. 411 for a brief discussion.

  62. 62.

    Of course, in the interpretation of the law and establishing the right understanding of it in individual cases, ideas of what justice should be will influence the interpretation itself. Thus, the concepts of law and concepts of justice will interact and mutually determine each other in the practical hermeneutical circle of real life activity.

  63. 63.

    Hallaq , Wael B. (2009) An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 73.

  64. 64.

    Ibid.

  65. 65.

    Khadduri , op. cit., p. 179.

  66. 66.

    For a brief but valuable discussion of Islamic law as a source of legitimacy, see Hallaq , op. cit., pp. 42–44.

  67. 67.

    Ibn Khaldun, op. cit., p. 40; the Mobedh is the title of the Zoroastrian priest and Mobedhan is the Persian plural of the word.

  68. 68.

    Ibid.

  69. 69.

    This pseudo-Aristotelian book is better known as Sirr al-asrar or Secretum Secretorum and allegedly translated from Greek, but it appears that the treatise was actually composed originally in Arabic.

  70. 70.

    Ibid, p. 41.

  71. 71.

    Ibid.

  72. 72.

    For the following, see the biography of Ibn Khaldun by Franz Rosenthal in his three-volume translation of al-Muqaddima. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1958; Khadduri , op. cit., p. 185–189; and Fromherz , Allen James (2010) Ibn Khaldun, Life and Times. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

  73. 73.

    Fromherz , op. cit., p. 99.

  74. 74.

    Ibid.

  75. 75.

    Ibid, p. 100.

  76. 76.

    Quoted after Fromherz , op. cit., p. 100.

References and Literature

  • Al-Azmeh, A. (1981). Ibn Khaldun in modern scholarship – A study in orientalism. London: Third World Centre for Research and Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Azmeh, A. (1990). Ibn Khaldun. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. (2001). The history of Islamic political thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, N. (1996). Law. In S. H. Nasr & O. Leaman (Eds.), History of Islamic philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, N. (1998). Islamic philosophy of law. In Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ip/rep/H015.htm

  • Crone, P. (2004). Medieval Islamic political thought. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhry, M. (1998). Ethics in Islamic philosophy. In Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.muslimphilosophy.com/ip/rep/H018.htm

  • Fromherz, A. J. (2010). Ibn Khaldun, life and times. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gule, L. (2003). Social development and political progress in two traditions. Larvik: Ariadne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gule, L. (2013). Ibn Khaldun og vitenskapen om sivilisasjonene. In J. Pedersen (Ed.), Politisk filosofi fra Platon til Hannah Arendt. Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Khaldun. (1969). Al-Muqaddimah (Trans. by F. Rosenthal into English, ed. and abridged by N. J. Dawood). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Khaldun. (1989). Prelogomena (Trans. by Ingvar Rydberg into Swedish). Lund: Alhambra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Khaldun. (2012). Al-Muqaddimah (Trans. by Magid Al-Araki into Norwegian). Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadduri, M. (1984). The Islamic conception of justice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambton, A. K. (1981). State and government in medieval Islam: An introduction to the study of Islamic political thought: The Jurists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdi, M. (2004). Ibn Khaldun. In M. M. Sharif (ed.), A history of Muslim philosophy. Delhi: Low Price Publications. (Originally published: Wiesbaden: Otto Harassowitz, 1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mawardi, Abu al-Hasan. (2000). Al-Ahkam al-Sultaniya w’al-Wilayat al-Diniyya [The Ordinances of Government]. Reading: Garnet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensia, M. A., & Mensia, M. A. (2012). Islamic philosophy of law. In C. Berry Gray (Ed.), The philosophy of law. An encyclopedia. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahemtulla, S. (2012). Justice. In G. Bowering (Ed.), Princeton encyclopedia of Islamic political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, E. I. J. (1940). Ibn Khaldun: A North African Muslim thinker of the fourteenth century. Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 24(2), 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg, I. (1989). Översettarens inledning. In Ibn Khaldun (ed.), Prelogomena. Lund: Alhambra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikør, K. S. (2005). Between God and sultan. A history of Islamic law. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikør, K. S. (n.d.). ‘Sharia’ from Oxford Islamic studies online. http://bridgingcultures.neh.gov/muslimjourneys/items/show/226

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Gule .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gule, L. (2015). Ibn Khaldun: Law and Justice in the Science of Civilisation. In: Fløistad, G. (eds) Philosophy of Justice. Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9175-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics