Skip to main content

On-Site Testing: Moving Decision Making from the Lab to the Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Detection and Diagnostics of Plant Pathogens

Part of the book series: Plant Pathology in the 21st Century ((ICPP,volume 5))

Abstract

On-site testing is a term that is often used to describe two distinct activities, firstly detection is the initial locating of the pest or pathogen infected sample which in most instances is performed visually. The second activity is identification, usually this is achieved by sending suspected samples to a laboratory. In recent years there has been significant research activity in each of the areas to provide technological solutions to enable more rapid decision making. Of course it is not necessarily just inspection services who benefit from these techniques, they can be deployed throughout the farm to fork, agri-production chain by seed producers, growers, processors, pack-houses etc. to limit losses caused by pathogens and pests. How best to deploy detection methods however may provide a potential conundrum for policy makers and other stakeholders. Deploying simplified detection and identification methods remotely helps to speed up inspection and facilitates trade. However, without care this approach may risk a blinkered, targeted inspection approach and a ‘winding down’ of laboratory expertise which is needed during outbreaks of new pests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrea L, Joyce AL, Hunt RE, Bernal JS, Vinson SB (2008) Substrate influences mating success and transmission of courtship vibrations for the parasitoid. Cotesia marginiventris 127(1):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Apan A, Held A, Phinn S, Markley J (2004) Detecting sugarcane ‘orange rust’ disease using EO–1 Hyperion hyperspectral imagery. Int J Remote Sens 25(2):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin S, De Kogel WJ, Donner P, Faccoli M, Lees DC, Marini L, Mori N, Toffolo EP, Quilici S, Roques A, Yart A, Battisti A (2012a) A list of methods to detect quarantine arthropod pests in Europe. OEPP/EPPO Bull 42:93–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin S, Boonham N, De Kogel WJ, Donner P, Faccoli M, Lees DC, Marini L, Mori N, Petrucco Toffolo E, Quilici S, Roques A, Yart A, Battisti A (2012b) A review of pest surveillance techniques for detecting quarantine pests in Europe. EPPO Bull 42:515–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawden FC (1933) Infra-red photography and plant virus diseases. Nature (Lond) 132:168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonham N, Glover R, Tomlinson J, Mumford R (2008) Exploiting generic platform technologies for the detection and identification of plant pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol 121:355–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain K, Briens M, Jacobs JH, Clark SJ, Pickett JA (2012) Use of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) to detect the presence of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata Wiedemann) larvae in Valencia oranges. J Sci Food Agric 92(10):2050–2054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chesmore D, Schofield J (2010) Acoustic detection of statutory pests in hardwood material. Bull Eur Plant Pathol Organ (EPPO) 40(1):46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinellato F, Simonato M, Battisti A, Faccoli M, Hardwick S, Suckling DM (2013) Smart-traps combined with molecular on-site detection to monitor Monochamus spp. and associated pine wood nematode. In: Schröder T (ed) Pine wilt disease conference 2013, Braunschweig, pp 23–25. ISSN: 1866-590X

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook FM (1937) The aural detection of the larvae of insects in timber. J Sci Ins 14:119–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danks C, Barker I (2000) On-site detection of plant pathogens using lateral-flow devices. EPPO Bull/Bull OEPP 30(3–4):421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer JG, Hordijk CA, Posthumus MA, Dicke M (2008) Prey and non-prey arthropods sharing a host plant: effects on induced volatile emission and predator attraction. J Chem Ecol 34(3):281–290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (2010) PM 7/76 use of EPPO diagnostic protocols. EPPO Bull/Bull OEPP 40:350–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke J, Menz G (2007) Multi-temporal wheat disease detection by multi-spectral remote sensing. Prec Agric 8(3):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandelman O, Jackson R, Kiddle G, Tisi L (2011) Loop-mediated amplification accelerated by stem primers. Int J Mol Sci 12(12):9108–9124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • James HE, Ebert K, McGonigle R, Reid SM, Boonham N, Tomlinson JA, Hutchings GH, Denyer M, Oura CAL, Dukes JP, King DP (2010) Detection of African swine fever virus by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). J Virol Methods 164(1–2):68–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen RMC, Hofstee JW, Wildt J, Verstappen FWA, Bouwmeester HJ, van Henten EJ (2009) Induced plant volatiles allow sensitive monitoring of plant health status in greenhouses. Plant Signal Behav 4(9):824–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen RMC, Wildt J, Kappers IF, Bouwmeester HJ, Hofstee JW, van Henten EJ (2011) Detection of diseased plants by analysis of volatile organic compound emission. Ann Rev Phytopathol 49:157–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lelong CCD, Burger P, Jubelin G, Roux B, Labbé S, Baret F (2008) Assessment of unmanned aerial vehicles imagery for quantitative monitoring of wheat crop in small plots. Sensors 8(5):3557–3585

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mankin RW, Smith MT, Tropp JM, Atkinson EB, Jong DY (2008) Detection of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) larvae in different host trees and tissues by automated analyses of sound-impulse frequency and temporal patterns. J Econ Entomol 101(3):838–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miresmailli S, Gries R, Gries G, Zamar RH, Isman MB (2010) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles allow detection of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) infestation on greenhouse tomato plants. Pest Manag Sci 66(8):916–924

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28(12):E63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Potamitis I, Ganchev T, Fakotakis N (2008) Automatic bioacoustic detection of Rhynchophorus Ferrungineus. In: 16th European Signal Processing Conference (EU-SIPCO 2008), Lausanne, Switzerland, 25–29 Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilici S, Donner P, Battisti A (2012) Surveillance techniques for exotic insect pest detection. Bull OEPP/EPPO 42(1):95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Kranz, Sicke (1935) A sound amplifier for the detection of infestations by the house beetle. Deutsche Bauzeitung 20:392–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp EL, Perry CR, Scharen AL, Boatwright GO, Sands DC, Lautenschlager LF, Yahyaoui CM, Ravet FW (1985) Monitoring cereal rust development with a spectral radiometer. Phytopathology 75(8):936–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli F, Cellini A, Vanneste JL, Rodriguez-Estrada MT, Costa G, Savioli S, Harren FJM, Cristescu SM (2012) Emission of volatile compounds by Erwinia amylovora: biological activity in vitro and possible exploitation for bacterial identification. Trees 26:141–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steddom K, Jones D, Rush C (2005) A picture is worth a thousand words. APSnet Feature. https://www.apsnet.org/publications/apsnetfeatures/Pages/RemoteSensing.aspx

  • Tomlinson J, Boonham N (2008) Potential of LAMP for detection of plant pathogens. CAB Rev: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 3(066):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson JA, Barker I, Boonham N (2007) Faster, simpler, more-specific methods for improved molecular detection of Phytophthora ramorum in the field. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(12):4040–4047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson JA, Dickinson M, Hobden E, Robinson S, Giltrap PM, Boonham N (2010a) A five-minute DNA extraction method for expedited detection of Phytophthora ramorum following prescreening using Phytophthora spp. lateral flow devices. J Microbiol Methods 81:116–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson JA, Dickinson MJ, Boonham N (2010b) Detection of Botrytis cinerea by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Lett Appl Microbiol 51:650–657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson J, Dickinson M, Boonham N (2010c) Rapid detection of Phytophthora ramorum and P kernoviae by two-minute DNA extraction followed by isothermal amplification, and amplicon detection by generic lateral flow device. Phytopathology 100(2):143–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance L (1987) Use of enzyme amplification in an ELISA to increase sensitivity of detection of barley yellow dwarf virus in oats and in individual vector aphids. J Virol Methods 15(2):131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallner WE, Ellis TL (1976) Olfactory detection of gypsy moth pheromone and egg masses by domestic canines. Environ Entomol 5:183–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Weißbecker B, Schütz S, Klein A, Hummel HE (1997) Analysis of volatiles emitted by potato plants by means of a Colorado beetle electroantennographic detector. Talanta 44(12):2217–2224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding from Framework 7 of the European Union under grant agreement 245047 for the project Q-detect: Developing quarantine pest detection methods for use by national plant protection organisations (NPPO) and inspection services. NB would in particular like to acknowledge helpful discussions during the course of the project with Maja Ravnikar, Juerg Frey, Andrea Battisti, Francoise Petter, Martin Brandstetter, Maja Zorovich, Cor Schoen, Hugh Mortimer, Jenny Tomlinson, Michael Andreou and Andreas Buhlmann.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Boonham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boonham, N. (2014). On-Site Testing: Moving Decision Making from the Lab to the Field. In: Gullino, M., Bonants, P. (eds) Detection and Diagnostics of Plant Pathogens. Plant Pathology in the 21st Century, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9020-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics