Abstract
This article focuses on the relationship between trainers and apprentices within Swiss training centers and aims to highlight how interactional processes can lead to a legitimate, recognized and valued social position for learners within learning communities of practice. We consider this “successful” dimension an important component of learning processes and construction of learning trajectories. If social interactions contribute to knowledge, skill and identity construction, learning through collective practices and interactions is seldom settled linearly and harmoniously. Collective learning configurations involve heterogeneous and unequal forms of mutual participation and relationships amongst participants. By adopting an interactional and multimodal perspective on training practices our contribution captures the conditions of “successful” and “unsuccessful” transitions in vocational training programs. From recently collected audio-video data in a training center involving first year apprentices in industrial trades, two contrasting case studies are examined. The first one leads to valued forms of participation, the other one marginalizes the role of the apprentice within the community of practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This research program has been sponsored by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) under references PP001-106603 and PP00P1-124650. It has benefited from the contributions of Prof. Ingrid de Saint-Georges, Dr. Barbara Duc and Dr. Stefano Losa.
- 2.
The following transcripts are translated from French. Transcription conventions are listed in the Appendix.
- 3.
This is a program, offered by the department of public instruction of Geneva, that aimed to prepare young people to enter VET system.
- 4.
The trainer refers to the instructions that he gave to the group of apprentices and that have been retold to ROD by KEV.
References
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the Workplace. Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 312–324. doi:10.1108/13665620410550295.
Billett, S. (2009). Workplace participatory practices: The dualities constituting learning through work. In M. Durand & L. Filliettaz (Eds.), Travail et formation des adultes (pp. 37–63). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Brown, J. S., et al. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–43. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Saint-Georges, I. (2008). La multimodalité et ses ressources pour l’enseignement – apprentissage [Multimodality and its resources for teaching and learning]. In L. Filliettaz, I. de Saint-Georges, & B. Duc (Eds.), Vos mains sont intelligentes! : Interactions en formation professionnelle initiale (pp. 117–158). Université de Genève: Cahiers de la Section des Sciences de l’Education, 117.
Dodier, N. (1993). Les arènes des habiletés techniques [Arenas of technical skills]. Raisons Pratiques, 4, 115–139.
Filliettaz, L. (2002). La parole en action. Eléments de pragmatique psycho-sociale [Talk in action. Contributions to a psychosocial pragmatics]. Québec: Editions Nota bene.
Filliettaz, L. (2010a). Interaction and miscommunication in the Swiss vocational education context: Researching vocational learning from a linguistic perspective. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7, 27–50. doi:10.1558/jalpp.v7i1.27.
Filliettaz, L. (2010b). Dropping out of apprenticeship programs: Evidence from the Swiss vocational education system and methodological perspectives for research. International Journal of Training Research, 8, 141–153. doi:10.5172/ijtr.8.2.141.
Filliettaz, L. (2010c). Guidance as an interactional accomplishment: Practice-based learning within the Swiss VET system. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 156–179). Dordrecht: Springer.
Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I., & Duc, B. (2008). Vos mains sont intelligentes!: Interactions en formation professionnelle initiale [Your hands are intelligent! Interactions in initial vocational training]. Université de Genève: Cahiers de la Section des Sciences de l’Education, 117.
Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I., & Duc, B. (2009). Interactions verbales et dynamiques de participation en formation professionnelle initiale. In M. Durand & L. Filliettaz (Eds.), Travail et formation des adultes (pp. 95–124). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I., & Duc, B. (2010). Skiing, cheese fondue and Swiss watches: Analogical discourse in vocational training interactions. Vocations & Learning, 3, 117–140. doi:10.1007/s12186-010-9035-4.
Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition: Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.
Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.
Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16, 407–426. doi:10.1080/1363908032000093012.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 641–653. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00605.x.
Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacobsen, H. M., & Kristiansen, S. (2009). Micro-recognition. Erving Goffman as recognition thinker. Sosiologisk Årbok, 3–4, 47–76.
Kress, G., Charalampos, T., Ogborn, J., & Jewitt, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
Kunégel, P. (2005). L’apprentissage en entreprise: l’activité de médiation des tuteurs [Learning within the company: The mediating activity of tutors]. Education Permanente, 165, 127–138.
Lamamra, N., & Masdonati, J. (2009). Arrêter une formation professionnelle: Mots et maux d’apprenti-e-s [Dropping out from vocational training: An apprentice’s perspective]. Lausanne: Antipodes.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayen, P. (2002). Le rôle des autres dans le développement de l’expérience [The role of others in the development of experience]. Education Permanente, 139, 65–86.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mondada, L. (2004). Temporalité, séquentialité et multimodalité au fondement de l’organisation de l’interaction: Le pointage comme pratique de prise du tour [Temporality, sequentiality and multimodality as basis for the organization of interaction: Pointing as turn-taking practice]. Cahiers de linguistique française, 26, 269–292.
Mottiez Lopez, L. (2008). Apprentissage situé. La microculture de classe en mathématiques [Situated learning. The microculture of mathematics class]. Berne: Peter Lang.
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. London: Routledge.
Stalder, B. E., & Nägele, C. (2011). Vocational education and training in Switzerland: Organisation, development and challenges for the future. In M. M. Bergman, S. Hupka- Brunner, A. Keller, T. Meyer, & B. E. Stalder (Eds.), Youth transitions in Switzerland: Results from the TREE panel study (pp. 18–39). Zürich: Seismo.
Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, 225–246. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Transcription Conventions
Appendix: Transcription Conventions
or .. | pause |
5s | longer pause |
a: | vowel lengthening |
- | interrupted segment |
/ | rising tone |
\ | falling tone |
CAPitals | accentuated segment |
((action, movement or gesture)) | non-verbal behavior |
(uncertain) | segments whose transcription is uncertain |
MON > ROD | selection of addressed recipient |
XX | unintelligible segment |
?? | unidentifiable speaker |
underlined segment | overlapping |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Losa, S.A., Duc, B., Filliettaz, L. (2014). Success, Well-Being and Social Recognition: An Interactional Perspective on Vocational Training Practices. In: Keller, A., Samuel, R., Bergman, M., Semmer, N. (eds) Psychological, Educational, and Sociological Perspectives on Success and Well-Being in Career Development. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8911-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8911-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8910-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8911-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)