Skip to main content

Facilitating Intimate and Thoughtful Attention to Infants and Toddlers in Nursery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care

Abstract

Infants and toddlers have a well-known and distinctive power to stir up deep emotions in adult caregivers. This capacity and the attuned responsiveness of adults has been conceptualised in different ways: maternal reverie (Bion WR, Learning from experience. Heinemann/Basic Books, London/New York, 1962), attachment (Bowlby J, Attachment. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1969), innate intersubjectivity (Trevarthen C, Aitken K, J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 42(1):3–48, 2001) and reflective function (Fonagy P, Attachment theory and psychoanalysis. Other Press, New York, 2001). At home, the way adults respond to infants and toddlers is likely to be deeply instinctive and thoughtful but driven by strong emotion and shaped by the distinctive values and practices of individual families and their cultural contexts. In early years’ settings, the way practitioners respond is likely to be influenced by some of this, but in quite a different way. This chapter is about Work Discussion (WD), a form of professional reflection in which thoughtful attention can be given to the emotional life of early years’ settings, and the details of individual interactions that make up this life. It draws on the findings of three recent studies of WD in the early years. WD is seen as having a particular contribution to understanding and managing the emotional life of settings in a way that can draw on objective and detailed descriptions of interactions and their contexts combined with the subjective experience evoked by these interactions. Such professional reflection matters for the wellbeing of all in the early years’ community: children and families, staff and external advisers, but most of all infants and toddlers themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have taken infants to refer to the age range birth to 12 months and toddlers 12 months to around 30 months.

References

  • Bain, A., & Barnett, L. (1986). The design of a day care system in a nursery setting for children under five: An abridged version of a report of an action research project (Document No. 2T347). Institute of Human Relations for the Department of Health and Social Security (1975–1979). London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. (2007). cited in Oates, J. (Ed.). Attachment relationships (p. 10). Bernard van Leer Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., McCartney, K., Vandell, D., Clarke-Stewart, K., & Owen, M. T. (2007). Are there long term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78(2), 681–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London/New York: Heinemann/Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, L. (2009). Constructing the triangle of care: Power and professionalism in practitioner/parent relationships. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., Sidle-Fuligni, A., & Berlin, L. J. (Eds.). (2003). Early child development in the 21st century: Profiles of current research initiatives. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke-Stewart, A., & Allhusen, V. (2005). What we know about childcare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colley, H. (2006). Learning to labour with feeling: Class, gender and emotion in childcare education and training. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datler, W., Datler, M., & Funder, A. (2010). Struggling against a feeling of becoming lost: A young boy’s painful transition to day care. International Journal of Infant Observation, 13(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degotardi, S., & Pearson, E. (2009). Relationship theory in the nursery: Attachment and beyond. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(2), 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education [DfE]. (2012). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills [DfES]. (2002). Birth to three matters: A framework for supporting early years practitioners. London: SureStart Unit, DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health [DoH]. (1991). The Children Act 1989: Guidance and regulations (Vol. 2). London: Family Support, Day Care and Educational Provision for Young Children, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolby, R. (2007). The circle of security: Roadmap to building supportive relationships. Canberra: Early Childhood Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drugli, M. B., & Undheim, A. M. (2012). Relationships between young children in full time day care and their caregivers: A qualitative study of parental and caregiver perceptions. Early Childhood Development and Care, 182(9), 1155–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbeck, M., & Yim, H. (2009). Rethinking attachment: Fostering positive relationships between infants, toddlers and their primary caregivers. Early Child Development and Care, 179(7), 899–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, P. (2006). Exploring children’s expressions of attachment in nursery. European Early Childhood Education Journal, 14(2), 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, P. (2008). 5000 hours: Organising for intimacy in the care of babies and children under three attending full time nursery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of East London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, P. (2012). Emotion in nursery work: Work discussion as a model of critical professional reflection. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(2), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, P., & Dearnley, K. (2007). Nurseries and emotional well-being: Evaluating an emotionally containing model of professional development. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 27(3), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, P., Goldschmied, J., & Selleck, D. (2011). Key persons in the early years: Building relationships for quality provision in early years settings and primary schools. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment theory and psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P. (2009). Research in child psychotherapy: Progress, problems and possibilities? In N. Midgley, J. Anderson, E. Grainger, T. Nesic-Vuckovic, & C. Urwin (Eds.), Child psychotherapy and research: New approaches, emerging findings (pp. 19–34). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmied, E., & Jackson, S. (1994). People under three: Young children in day care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hascher, T. (2010). Learning and emotion: Perspectives for theory and research. European Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 13–28. doi:10.2304/eerj.2010.9.1.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. (1988). Facilitating the development of intimacy between nurses and infants in day nurseries. Early Child Development and Care, 33, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. (Ed.). (2011). Too much too soon: Early learning and the erosion of childhood. Stroud: Hawthorne House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, E. (2008). Work discussion groups in educational settings. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 34(1), 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2006). A journey to a close, secure and synchronous relationship: Infant–caregiver relationship development in a childcare context. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 4(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning-Morton, J., & Thorp, M. (2001). Key times: A framework for developing high quality provision for children under three years old. London: Camden Local Education Authority/University of North London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melhuish, E. (2004). Child benefits: The importance of investing in quality childcare (Facing the future, policy papers). London: Daycare Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbrown, C., & Page, J. (2008). Working with babies and children from birth to three. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, J., & Elfer, P. (2013). The emotional complexity of attachment interactions in nursery. European Early Childhood Research Journal, 21(4), 553–567. doi:doi/abs/10.1080/1350293X.2013.766032

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustin, M. (2001). Reason and unreason. Psychoanalysis, science and politics. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustin, M. E., & Bradley, J. (Eds.). (2008). Work discussion: Learning from reflective practice in work with children and families. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth, J. (1989). Theories of development. In L. Miller, M. E. Rustin, M. J. Rustin, & J. Shuttleworth (Eds.), Closely observed infants (pp. 22–51). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, G. (2011). Don’t we care? The ethics and emotional labour of early years’ professionalism. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 31(1), 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (2005). Action and emotion in development of cultural intelligence: Why infants have feelings like ours. In J. Nadel & D. Muir (Eds.), Emotional development (pp. 61–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity: Research, theory, and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 42(1), 3–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowell, J. (1995). Key psychoanalytic concepts. In J. Trowell & M. Bower (Eds.), The emotional needs of young children and their families: Using psychoanalytic ideas in the community. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Youell, B. (2005). Assessment, evaluation and inspection in schools: A psychodynamic perspective. Infant Observation, 8(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Elfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elfer, P. (2014). Facilitating Intimate and Thoughtful Attention to Infants and Toddlers in Nursery. In: Harrison, L., Sumsion, J. (eds) Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8838-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics