Abstract
The idea that infants communicate prior to their first words is not new to anyone who has spent time with infants. However, the recognition that preverbal children can communicate both intentionally and symbolically prior to speech, through use of infant signs, also known as symbolic gestures or Baby Signs®, has opened a window into the mind of the infant for scientists, parents, and early childhood educators. For a parent, a child’s use of signs can reveal the mental contents—desires, needs, memories—of the individual infant whose mind they most want to know. For scientists, symbolic gestures can reveal the general capacities of the infant mind—what preverbal children are capable of thinking, feeling, remembering, and representing about their lived experiences. For early childhood educators, who are charged with caring for groups of young children, and with continually enhancing their own knowledge of child development to develop as professionals, infant signs are a tool to both understand individual children in their care, and learn about the often underestimated social, cognitive, and communicative capacities of preverbal children. In this chapter, we describe our theoretical frameworks for understanding the use of infant signs, summarize existing research on infant signs in early childhood settings, reflect on the effects it has on professional development, and describe the principles and practices for using signs effectively. Finally, we discuss our concerns and current questions about this practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Symbolic gestures are simple hand gestures, typically with an iconic relationship to a specific referent.
- 2.
University laboratory schools are ECEC centers typically located on university campuses and run by universities for the purposes of: (a) demonstrating high quality care and education; (b) educating student caregivers and teachers through supervised practicum experiences; and (c) facilitating research on child development and education for university students and faculty. More information is available from the National Coalition for Campus Children’s Centers: http://campuschildren.org/about.html.
- 3.
This anecdote was previously published in Vallotton (2011a, p. 119).
References
Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development, 59, 450–466.
Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (1992). Baby signs: How to talk with your baby before your baby can talk. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
Amini-Virmani, E., & Ontai, L. (2010). Supervision and training in child care: Does reflective supervision foster caregiver insightfulness. Infant Mental Health Journal, 31, 16–32.
Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic.
Bell, R. Q., & Harper, L. V. (1977). Child effects on adults. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 18, 906–921.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor [USDoL]. (2010). Career guide to industries: Child day care services (2010–2011, Ed.). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs032.htm
Crais, E., Douglas, D. D., & Campbell, C. C. (2004). The intersection of the development of gestures and intentionality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 678–694.
Crockenberg, S., & Leerkes, E. (2003). Infant negative emotionality, caregiving, and family relationships. In A. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Children’s influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family relationships (pp. 57–78). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Dunn, J., Bretherton, I., & Munn, P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their young children. Developmental Psychology, 23, 132–139.
Fusaro, M., & Vallotton, C. D. (2011). Giving a nod to social cognition: Developmental constraints on the emergence of conventional gestures and infant signs. In G. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.), Integrating gesture: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 121–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The two faces of gesture: Language and thought. Gesture, 5(1–2), 241–257.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Goodrich, W., Sauer, E., & Iverson, J. (2007). Young children use their hands to tell their mothers what to say. Developmental Science, 10(6), 778–785.
Goodwyn, S., Acredolo, L., & Brown, A. L. (2000). Impact of symbolic gesturing on early language development. Journal of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior, 24(2), 81–103.
Johnston, A. (2005). Who benefits from baby signing? Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
Karen, R. (1994). Becoming attached: First relationships and how they shape our capacity to love. New York: Oxford University Press.
Karsten, A., Decker, K. B., Bentley, S., Gutowski, E., & Vallotton, C. D. (2011, April). Trajectories of symbolic gesture acquisition and use in infants and toddlers. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal.
Kelly, S., Manning, D., & Rodak, S. (2008). Gesture gives a hand to language and learning: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology and education. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 1–20.
Kelly, S., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334.
Namy, L., Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (2000). Verbal labels and gestural routines in parental communication with young children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(2), 63–79.
Page, J., Clare, A., & Nutbrown, C. (2013). Working with babies and children from birth to three. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early child language. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome Bruner (pp. 156–186). New York: Norton & Company.
Rodriguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2007). Do private gestures have a self-regulatory function? A case study. Infant Behavior & Development, 30, 180–194.
Rowe, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning. Developmental Science, 12, 182–187.
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype greater than environment effects. Child Development, 54(2), 424–435.
Tomasello, M. (2003). The key is social cognition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 47–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vallotton, C. D. (2008). Signs of emotion: What can preverbal children “say” about internal states? Infant Mental Health Journal, 29, 234–258.
Vallotton, C. D. (2009). Do infants influence their quality of care? Infants’ communicative gestures predict caregivers’ responsiveness. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 351–365.
Vallotton, C. D. (2010). Support or competition? Dynamic development of the relationship between pointing and symbolic gestures from 6 to 18 months of age. Gesture, 10, 150–171.
Vallotton, C. D. (2011a). Babies open our minds to their minds: How “listening” to infant signs complements and extends our knowledge of infants and their development. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32, 115–133.
Vallotton, C. D. (2011b). Sentences and conversations before speech? Gestures of preverbal children reveal cognitive and social skills that do not wait for words. In G. Stam (Ed.), Integrating gesture: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 105–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vallotton, C. D. (2012). Infant signs as intervention? Promoting symbolic gestures for preverbal children in low-income families supports responsive parent-child relationships. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 401–415.
Vygotksy, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagner, M. (2006). First steps to communication: A pragmatic approach. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1984). Symbol formation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vallotton, C.D., Harewood, T., Karsten, A., Decker, K.B. (2014). Infant Signs Reveal Infant Minds to Early Childhood Professionals. In: Harrison, L., Sumsion, J. (eds) Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8838-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8838-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8837-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8838-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)