Skip to main content

Infant Signs Reveal Infant Minds to Early Childhood Professionals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care

Abstract

The idea that infants communicate prior to their first words is not new to anyone who has spent time with infants. However, the recognition that preverbal children can communicate both intentionally and symbolically prior to speech, through use of infant signs, also known as symbolic gestures or Baby Signs®, has opened a window into the mind of the infant for scientists, parents, and early childhood educators. For a parent, a child’s use of signs can reveal the mental contents—desires, needs, memories—of the individual infant whose mind they most want to know. For scientists, symbolic gestures can reveal the general capacities of the infant mind—what preverbal children are capable of thinking, feeling, remembering, and representing about their lived experiences. For early childhood educators, who are charged with caring for groups of young children, and with continually enhancing their own knowledge of child development to develop as professionals, infant signs are a tool to both understand individual children in their care, and learn about the often underestimated social, cognitive, and communicative capacities of preverbal children. In this chapter, we describe our theoretical frameworks for understanding the use of infant signs, summarize existing research on infant signs in early childhood settings, reflect on the effects it has on professional development, and describe the principles and practices for using signs effectively. Finally, we discuss our concerns and current questions about this practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Symbolic gestures are simple hand gestures, typically with an iconic relationship to a specific referent.

  2. 2.

    University laboratory schools are ECEC centers typically located on university campuses and run by universities for the purposes of: (a) demonstrating high quality care and education; (b) educating student caregivers and teachers through supervised practicum experiences; and (c) facilitating research on child development and education for university students and faculty. More information is available from the National Coalition for Campus Children’s Centers: http://campuschildren.org/about.html.

  3. 3.

    This anecdote was previously published in Vallotton (2011a, p. 119).

References

  • Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (1988). Symbolic gesturing in normal infants. Child Development, 59, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (1992). Baby signs: How to talk with your baby before your baby can talk. Chicago: Contemporary Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amini-Virmani, E., & Ontai, L. (2010). Supervision and training in child care: Does reflective supervision foster caregiver insightfulness. Infant Mental Health Journal, 31, 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. Q., & Harper, L. V. (1977). Child effects on adults. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 18, 906–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor [USDoL]. (2010). Career guide to industries: Child day care services (2010–2011, Ed.). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs032.htm

  • Crais, E., Douglas, D. D., & Campbell, C. C. (2004). The intersection of the development of gestures and intentionality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 678–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockenberg, S., & Leerkes, E. (2003). Infant negative emotionality, caregiving, and family relationships. In A. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Children’s influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family relationships (pp. 57–78). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., Bretherton, I., & Munn, P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their young children. Developmental Psychology, 23, 132–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusaro, M., & Vallotton, C. D. (2011). Giving a nod to social cognition: Developmental constraints on the emergence of conventional gestures and infant signs. In G. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.), Integrating gesture: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 121–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). The two faces of gesture: Language and thought. Gesture, 5(1–2), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Goodrich, W., Sauer, E., & Iverson, J. (2007). Young children use their hands to tell their mothers what to say. Developmental Science, 10(6), 778–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwyn, S., Acredolo, L., & Brown, A. L. (2000). Impact of symbolic gesturing on early language development. Journal of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior, 24(2), 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. (2005). Who benefits from baby signing? Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karen, R. (1994). Becoming attached: First relationships and how they shape our capacity to love. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, A., Decker, K. B., Bentley, S., Gutowski, E., & Vallotton, C. D. (2011, April). Trajectories of symbolic gesture acquisition and use in infants and toddlers. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., Manning, D., & Rodak, S. (2008). Gesture gives a hand to language and learning: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology and education. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S., McDevitt, T., & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namy, L., Acredolo, L., & Goodwyn, S. (2000). Verbal labels and gestural routines in parental communication with young children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(2), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, J., Clare, A., & Nutbrown, C. (2013). Working with babies and children from birth to three. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early child language. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome Bruner (pp. 156–186). New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2007). Do private gestures have a self-regulatory function? A case study. Infant Behavior & Development, 30, 180–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning. Developmental Science, 12, 182–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype greater than environment effects. Child Development, 54(2), 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2003). The key is social cognition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 47–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallotton, C. D. (2008). Signs of emotion: What can preverbal children “say” about internal states? Infant Mental Health Journal, 29, 234–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallotton, C. D. (2009). Do infants influence their quality of care? Infants’ communicative gestures predict caregivers’ responsiveness. Infant Behavior and Development, 32, 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallotton, C. D. (2010). Support or competition? Dynamic development of the relationship between pointing and symbolic gestures from 6 to 18 months of age. Gesture, 10, 150–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallotton, C. D. (2011a). Babies open our minds to their minds: How “listening” to infant signs complements and extends our knowledge of infants and their development. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallotton, C. D. (2011b). Sentences and conversations before speech? Gestures of preverbal children reveal cognitive and social skills that do not wait for words. In G. Stam (Ed.), Integrating gesture: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 105–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallotton, C. D. (2012). Infant signs as intervention? Promoting symbolic gestures for preverbal children in low-income families supports responsive parent-child relationships. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotksy, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2006). First steps to communication: A pragmatic approach. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1984). Symbol formation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire D. Vallotton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vallotton, C.D., Harewood, T., Karsten, A., Decker, K.B. (2014). Infant Signs Reveal Infant Minds to Early Childhood Professionals. In: Harrison, L., Sumsion, J. (eds) Lived Spaces of Infant-Toddler Education and Care. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8838-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics