Skip to main content

The 2004 Manawatu Floods, New Zealand: Integrating Flood Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adapting to Climate Change

Part of the book series: Environmental Hazards ((ENHA))

  • 2517 Accesses

Abstract

Climate change exacerbates the flood risk facing many New Zealand communities. The February 2004 floods severely impacted the Manawatu region and reveal valuable lessons and shed light on barriers and opportunities, and priority actions, for reducing flood risk and building resilience and adaptive capacity in the face of climate change. The 2004 floods and subsequent actions highlight five lessons: (i) Disasters are ‘focusing events’ that reframe risk perceptions and create opportunities for reducing risk and mainstreaming climate change adaptation; but realising such opportunities is fraught. (ii) There is a need to move beyond reliance on structural flood protection works to overcome the ‘safe development paradox,’ address the manifold drivers of flood risk and anticipate escalating flood risk given climate change. (iii) Managing flood risk and adapting to climate change need to be framed as an integrated and adaptive process for building resilience and sustainability. (iv) Strategies to build flood resilient communities need to take into account wider societal trends and shocks that may have no apparent association with natural hazard risk. (v) The past focus on Readiness and Response needs to be complemented by sharper focus on Reduction and Recovery; and the permissive approach to land use decisions and reliance on mitigation measures need to be superseded by the avoidance imperative. Efforts to mainstream climate change adaptation face barriers and opportunities in three vital arenas: Understanding risk; the institutional setting; and professional practice. Three priority actions are identified: (i) Institutionalise a national legislative directive to reduce natural hazard risks and build resilience in the face of climate change. (ii) Develop a capacity building programme to enable local government to translate this directive into practical reality. (iii) Proactively explore opportunities to reduce risk and adapt to climate change in day-to-day local planning and decision-making. A transformative practice of deliberative governance is ultimately needed to institutionalise the lessons learned from the 2004 flood experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://www.mfe.govt.nz/issues/climate/about/climate-change-affect-regions/manawatu-whanganui.html.

  2. 2.

    See http://www.horizons.govt.nz/assets/publications/about-us-publications/annual-plan/Annual-Plan-2013-14-FINAL-V4-Final-Changes-from-25-June-2013.pdf.

  3. 3.

    See http://www.mpi.govt.nz/environment-natural-resources/funding-programmes/slm-hill-country-erosion-programme/slmhce-project-sustainable-land-use-initiative.

  4. 4.

    See http://www.horizons.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Events/Regional_Council_Meeting/2013-06-25_100000/RC25062013AGNAT.pdf.

  5. 5.

    See http://www.horizons.govt.nz/assets/publications/about-us-publications/one-plan-publications-and-reports/proposed-one-plan/Chapter10_Hazards.pdf.

  6. 6.

    In the United States, the term ‘mitigation’ connotes the elimination or reduction of natural hazard risk. In NZ, ‘mitigation’ typically refers to ameliorative measures to reduce risk, such as elevating a building above a particular flood level, whereas ‘avoidance’ means keeping people and the things they value out of harms’ way.

  7. 7.

    See http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-resources/news/budget-strengthens-rural-communities-in-crises.

  8. 8.

    Any activities that are not permitted by the RMA, or by a rule in a city or district plan, require a ‘resource consent’ before they are carried out.

  9. 9.

    See http://www.mbie.govt.nz/what-we-do/national-science-challenges.

  10. 10.

    See http://www.horizons.govt.nz/managing-environment/resource-management/water/manawatu-river-leaders-accord.

References

  • Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., & O’Brien, K. L. (Eds.). (2009). Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmuth, T. (2011). Policy and science implications of the framing and qualities of uncertainty in risks: Toxic and beneficial fish from the Baltic Sea. Ambio, 40, 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterising risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism. Risk Analysis, 29(4), 587–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk management and governance. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2005). Deliberative environmental politics: Democracy and ecological rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benseman, M. (2013). Emergency manager, Wanganui District Council. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghan, T., & Westlake, S. (2001). Floodplain management planning guidelines: Current thinking and practice in New Zealand, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, P. (2013). Manager: Investigations and design, Horizons Regional Council. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bührs, T., & Bartlett, R. V. (1993). Environmental policy in New Zealand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby, R. J. (Ed.). (1998). Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burby, R. J. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. (2012). Final report volume 7, roles and responsibilities. http://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/Final-Report-Volume-Seven-Contents. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Carlyon, G. (2013). Director: The Catalyst Group. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A. (2013). Group manager: Operations, Horizons Regional Council. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. J. (2005a). Managing flood risk: The case for change. Christchurch: Centre for Advanced Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, T. J. (2005b). Managing flood risk: Draft flood management protocol. Christchurch: Centre for Advanced Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Liberalism, critics, contestations . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2011). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, J., & Shepherd, J. (2006). Highly erodable land in the Manawatu-Wanganui region, landcare research contract report: 0607/027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Management Services Limited. (2004). Review of Flood Response 2004. A report prepared for the Horizons Regional Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, N. J. (1986). Creating flood disasters? New Zealand’s need for a new approach to urban flood hazard, Water & Soil, Wellington: Miscellaneous Publication No. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, N. J. (2005a). Hang-ups in flood hazard planning (Part 1). Planning Quarterly, (September 2005), 158, 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, N. J. (2005b). The hang-up in flood hazard planning (Part 2). Planning Quarterly, (December 2005), 159, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson-Pie, J. (2013). Senior policy planner, Palmerston North City council, Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts and the environment: The politics of local knowledge . Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, I. (2005). February floods in the lower North Island, 2004: Catastrophe-causes and consequences. New Zealand Geographer, 61, 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavovic, B. C. (2010). Future challenges and opportunities for natural hazards planning in Australasia, Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies . http://www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/2010-1/glavovic2.htm. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Glavovic, B. C. (2013a). The coastal innovation paradox. Sustainability, 5, 912–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavovic, B. C. (2013b). The coastal innovation imperative. Sustainability, 5, 934–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glavovic, B. C., Saunders, W., & Becker, J. (2010). Land-use planning for natural hazards in New Zealand: The setting, barriers, ‘burning issues’ and priority actions. Natural Hazards, 54(3), 679–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, E. (2005). Lessons from mother nature. Planning Quarterly, September, 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancox, G. T., & Wright, K. (2005). Analysis of landsliding caused by the February 2004 rainstorms in the Wanganui-Manawatu hill country, southern North Island, New Zealand, Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences Science Report 2005/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handmer, J. (2008). Risk creation, bearing and sharing on Australian floodplains. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, K., Fitzharris, B., Bates, B. C., Harvey, N., Howden, S. M., Hughes, L., Salinger, J., & Warrick, R. (2007). Australia and New Zealand. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 507–540). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horizons Regional Council. (2004). Storm: Civil emergency storm and flood report, February 2004. Palmerston North: Horizons Regional Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand. (2012). A safer New Zealand: Reducing our exposure to natural hazards. Wellington: IPENZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. A., Fischhoff, B., & Lach, D. (1999). Evaluating the science-policy interface for climate change research. Climatic Change, 43, 581–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay, J. (2013). Farmer, Rangitikei district. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002). A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1071–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk governance: Contemporary and future challenges. In J. Eriksson, M. Gilek, & C. Ruden (Eds.), Regulating chemical risks: European and global challenges (pp. 9–27). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2012). Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 15(3), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, A., Dreyer, M., Renn, O., Stirling, A., & van Zwanenberg, P. (2006). Precautionary risk regulation in European governance. Journal of Risk Research, 9(4), 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1921). Uncertainty and profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J., & Quade, D. (2011). Perspectives on flood-risk management and climate change-Implications for local government decision making. Wellington: New Zealand Climate Change Research Institute Report 07.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B-Y. (2010). Working together, building capacity-A case study of civil defence emergency management in New Zealand. Journal of Disaster Research, 5(5), 565–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Science, 45, 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Local Government New Zealand. (2011). The local government case for a national policy statement for flood risk. Wellington: Local Government New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Local Government New Zealand. (2013). Local government New Zealand in the matter of the discussion document: Improving our resource management system, Submission. Wellington: Local Government New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, I. (2013). Manager: Emergency management, Horizons Regional Council. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, M. (2013). Policy planner, Palmerston North City council, Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manawatu-Wanganui CDEM Group. (2009). Civil defence emergency management group plan 2009-2014. Palmerston North: Manawatu-Wanganui CDEM Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, J., Wills, C., Johnston, D., & Recker, C. (2011a). How the 2010 Canterbury (Darfield) earthquake affected earthquake risk perception: Comparing citizens inside and outside the region. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2011-2012. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/2011-2/AJDTS_2011-2_McClure.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • McClure, J., Wills, C., Johnston, D., & Recker, C. (2011b). New Zealander’s judgements of earthquake risk before and after the Canterbury earthquake: Do they relate to preparedness? New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(4), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. (2008a). Meeting the challenges of future flooding in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment and the Flood Risk Management and River Control Review Steering Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. (2008b). Climate change effects and impacts assessment: A guidance manual for local government in New Zealand (2nd ed.). Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. (2008c). Hazards and climate change: A guidance manual for local government in New Zealand (2nd ed.). Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. (2008d). Preparing for climate change: A guide for local government in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. (2010a). Tools for estimating the effects of climate change on flood flow: A guidance manual for local government in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. (2010b). Preparing for future flooding. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment. (2013). Improving our resource management system. A discussion document. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management. (2004). The floods of February 2004. Impact, 17, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • NZPI (2012). NZPI Submission on TAG Report, Auckland: NZPI. http://www.planning.org.nz/Story?Action=View&Story_id=2455&Highlight1=Submission onTAG&Highlight2=Submission onTAG&Highlight3=Submission onTAG. Accessed 26 July 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODESC. (2007). National hazardscape report. Wellington: ODESC, Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade, D., & Lawrence, J. (2011). Vulnerability and adaptation to increased flood risk with climate change-Hutt Valley household survey. New Zealand climate change research institute report 06. Wellington: NZCCRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P., Brundson, D., Fitzharris, P., & Oughton, D. (2004). Review of the February 2004 flood event. Wellington: MCDEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger, A., Wratt, D., Allan, S., & Larsen, H. (2011). The role of local government in adapting to climate change: Lessons from New Zealand. In J. D. Ford & L. Berrang-Ford (Eds.), Climate change adaptation in developed nations: From theory to practice (pp. 303–319). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Klinke, A., & van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. Ambio, 40, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Weber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, H. (2012). Flood risk management research in New Zealand: Where are we, and where are we going? GNS Science Report 2012/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, W. S. A., & Beban, J. S. (2012). Putting R(isk) in the RMA: Technical advisory group recommendations on the resource management act 1991 and implications for natural hazards planning. GNS Science Miscellaneous Series 48. Wellington: GNS Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W., Davies-Colley, C., Mackay, A., & Bankoff, G. (2011). Social impact of the 2004 Manawatu floods and the ‘hollowing out’ of rural New Zealand. Disasters, 35(3), 340–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standards New Zealand. (2008). Managing flood risk—A Process Standard, NZS 9401:2008. ­Wellington: Standards New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A. (2003). Uncertainty and precaution: Some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In F. Berkhout, M. Leach, & I. Scoones (Eds.), Negotiating change (pp. 33–76). London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, A. (2010). Keep it complex. Nature, 468, 1029–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Technical Advisory Group. (2012). Report to the Minister for the Environment’s Resource Management Act 1991 principles Technical Advisory Group. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/rma/tag-rma-section6-7/index.html. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Turner, B. L. (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science. Global Environmental Change, 20, 570–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Belt, M., Schiele, H., & Forgie, V. (2013). Integrated freshwater solutions—A New Zealand application of mediated modeling. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 49(3), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. (2005). The floods of 2004— looking back, RM Update, 16 (February), p. 5. http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/publications/rmupdate/rm16/rm-february-2005.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Watson, J. (2013). Manager: Resource data, Horizons Regional Council, Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, J., Freestone, H., & Lew, D. (1997). Historic floods and droughts in New Zealand. In M. P. Mosley & C. P. Pearson (Eds.), Floods and droughts: The New Zealand experience. ­Wellington: New Zealand Hydrological Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter draws on research conducted by the author over a number of years, insights gained from supervising several Planning student projects and many discussions with local professionals. EQC support of this research through inter alia a biennial grant is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this chapter are, however, solely those of the author and do not in any way represent those of the EQC or any other organisation or individual. I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to explore these issues with local professionals over the years, as well as invaluable feedback on an earlier version of this chapter, including: Jeff Watson (HRC), Ian Lowe (HRC), Allan Cook (HRC), Peter Blackwood (HRC), Jonathan Ferguson-Pye and Matthew Mackay (Palmerston North City Council), Max Benseman (Wanganui District Council), Frances Sullivan (LGNZ), and Greg Carlyon (The Catalyst Group). I would also like to thank John Keay, a dairy farmer in the Rangitikei district, for generously sharing with my students and I his personal experiences during and after the 2004 floods which have provided us with deep insights into the lived reality of life in ‘the deluge.’ I also appreciate valuable feedback from Gavin Smith on a draft of this chapter. Lastly, I would like to thank Andrew Steffert (HRC) for his time and willingness to source photographs and maps from the HRC archives—you have helped to make visible the scale and impact of the 2004 floods.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce C. Glavovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glavovic, B. (2014). The 2004 Manawatu Floods, New Zealand: Integrating Flood Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation. In: Glavovic, B., Smith, G. (eds) Adapting to Climate Change. Environmental Hazards. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8631-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics