Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tracking Technologies for Quantifying Marine Mammal Interactions with Tidal Turbines: Pitfalls and Possibilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Marine Renewable Energy Technology and Environmental Interactions

Part of the book series: Humanity and the Sea ((HUMSEA))

Abstract

Currently, there is great uncertainty surrounding the environmental impacts of tidal turbines on marine mammals; one major concern derives from the potential for physical injury through direct contact with the moving structures of turbines. Collecting data to quantify these risks is challenging and methods for measuring movements underwater and interactions with turbines are limited. However, potential tools include a small number of cutting-edge technologies that are being used increasingly for research and monitoring; these include animal-borne telemetry, and active and passive acoustic tracking. Recent developments in these technologies are described along with their means of application in measuring fine-scale movements and avoidance or evasion responses by marine mammals around turbines. From a risk-characterization perspective, each technique can provide information to inform risk assessments or help parametrize collision risk models; however, each has its associated benefits and drawbacks and it is clear that, in isolation, none of them can provide all the data needed to address the problem. The three approaches appear highly complementary, with the strengths of one complementing the weaknesses in others; the solution to characterizing the risks posed by tidal turbines is likely to be a combination of such techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akamatsu T, Teilmann J, Miller LA, Tougaard J, Dietz R, Wang D, Wang K et al (2007) Comparison of echolocation behaviour between coastal and riverine porpoises. Deep Sea Res II: Top Stud Oceanog 54:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argos (2008) Argos userʼs manual. CLS Argos, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Au WWL (1996) Acoustic reflectivity of a dolphin. J Acoust Soc Am 99:3844–3848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Bird KJ, Au WL (2003a) Hawaiian spinner dolphins aggregate midwater food resources through cooperative foraging. J Acoust Soc Am 114:2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Bird KJ, Au WL (2003b) Prey dynamics affect foraging by a pelagic predator (Stenella longirostris) over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:364–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Bird KJ, Wursig B, McFadden CJ (2004) Dusky dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obscurus) foraging in two different habitats: active acoustic detection of dolphins and their prey. Mar Mamm Sci 20:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan J (2006) Future marine energy results of the Marine Energy Challenge: cost competitiveness and growth of wave and tidal stream energy. Carbon Trust Report. pp 40. http://www.oceanrenewable.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/futuremarineenergy.pdf

  • Carlson TJ, Watson BE, Elster JL, Copping AE, Jones ME, Watkins M, Jepsen R et al (2012) Assessment of strike of adult killer whales by an OpenHydro tidal turbine blade. Report to the US Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05–76RL01830

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell O, Leaper R, Gordon J (1996) Development and performance of an automated harbour porpoise click detector. Rep Int Whal Comm 46:587–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Ellison WT, Beeman K (1985) Progress report on the analysis of the spring 1985 acoustic data regarding migrating bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, near Point Barrow, Alaska. Rep Int Whal Comm 36:587–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen KT, Wahlberg M, Beedholm K, Deruiter S, Madsen PT (2010) Click communication in harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena. Bioacoustics 20:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis RW, Fuiman LA, Williams TM, Collier SO, Hagey WP, Kanatous SB, Kohin S et al (1999) Hunting behaviour of a marine mammal beneath the Antarctic fast ice. Science 283:993–996

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doksæter L, Godø OR, Olsen E, Nøttestad L, Patel R (2009) Ecological studies of marine mammals using a seabed-mounted echosounder. ICES J Mar Sci 66:1029–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn JL (1969) Airborne measurements of the acoustic characteristics of a sperm whale. J Acoust Soc Am 46:1052–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag LE, Tyack PL (1993) Passive acoustic localisation of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin using whistles and echolocation clicks. J Acoust Soc Am 93:2197–2205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fristrup KM, Hatch LT, Clark CW (2003) Variation in humpback whale song (Megaptera novaeangliae) song length in relation to low-frequency sound broadcasts. J Acoust Soc Am 113:3411–3424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie D, Chappell O (2002) An automatic system for detecting and classifying the vocalisations of harbour porpoises. Bioacoustics 13:37–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie D, Gordon J, McHugh R, McLaren D, Mellinger DK, Redmond P, Thode A et al (2008) PAMGUARD: semiautomated open source software for real-time acoustic detection and localisation of cetaceans. Proc Inst Acoust 30:67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Socoloske D, Olivera-Gomez LD (2012) Gentle giants in dark waters: using side-scan sonar for manatee research. Open Remote Sens J 5:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Socoloske D, Olivera-Gomez LD, Ford RE (2009) Detection of free-ranging West Indian manatees Trichechus manatus using side-scan sonar. Endang Species Res 8:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Thompson D, Leaper R, Gillespie D, Pierpoint C, Calderan S, Macauley J et al (2011) Assessment of risk to marine mammals from underwater marine renewable devices in Welsh waters. Phase 2. Studies of marine mammals in Welsh highly tidal waters. Report produced for the Welsh Assembly Government, Document JER3688R100707JG, by EcologicUK. pp 126

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie GD (2012). Tracking marine mammals around marine renewable energy devices using active sonar. SMRU Ltd, St Andrews Report to the Department of Energy and Climate Change. Report SMRUL-DEC-2012–002

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie GD, Donovan C, Götz T, Janik VM (in press) Behavioural responses by grey seals (Halichoerusgrypus) to high frequency sonar. Mar Poll Bull

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie GD, Wilson B, Thompson PM (2006) Diving deep in a foraging hotspot: acoustic insights into bottlenose dolphin dive depths and feeding behaviour. Mar Biol 148:1181–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzing DL (1996) Vocalizations and associated underwater behavior of free-ranging Atlantic spotted dolphins, Stenella frontalis and bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Aquat Mamm 22:61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Janik VM, Van Parijs SM, Thompson PM (2000) A two-dimensional acoustic localization system for marine mammals. Mar Mamm Sci 16:437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ME, Miller LM (1999) Echolocation signals of the bat Eptesicus serotinus recorded using a vertical microphone array: effect of flight altitude on searching signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MP, Tyack PL (2003) A digital acoustic recording tag for measuring the response of wild marine mammals to sound. J Ocean Eng 28:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein RA, Bunskoek P, Hagedoorn M, Au WWL, de Haan D (2002) Audiogram of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) measured with narrow-band frequency-modulated signals. J Acoust Soc Am 112:334–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak G, (2006) Side scan sonar target comparative techniques for port security and MCM Q-Route requirements. Report to L-3 Communications Klein Associates, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper R, Chappell O, Gordon JCD (1992). The development of practical techniques for surveying sperm whale populations acoustically. Rep Int Whal Comm 42:549–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T, Gillespie D, Matthews LJ, Danbolt M, Leaper R, McLanaghan R, Moscrop A (2007) Sperm whale abundance estimates from acoustic surveys of the Ionian Sea and Straits of Sicily in 2003. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 87:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan ME, Duck CD, Thompson D, Moss S (2011) British grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) numbers in 2008; an assessment based on using electronic tags to scale up from the results of aerial surveys. ICES J Mar Sci 68:2201–2209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan ME, Fedak M, McConnell B (2009) The effects of interpolation error and location quality on animal track reconstruction. Mar Mamm Sci 25:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love RH (1973) Target strengths of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae. J Acoust Soc Am 54:1312–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen PT, Payne R, Kristiansen NU, Wahlberg M, Kerr I, Mohl B (2002) Sperm whale sound production studied with ultrasound time/depth-recording tags. J Exp Biol 205:1899–1906

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mate B, Mesecar R, Lagerquist B (2007) The evolution of satellite-monitored radio tags for large whales: one laboratoryʼs experience. Deep Sea Res II: Top Stud Oceanog 54:224–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell BJ, Fedak M, Hooker SK, Patterson T (2010) Telemetry. In: Boyd IL, Bowen WD, Iverson SJ (eds) Marine mammal ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 222–262

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell BJ, Fedak MA, Lovell P, Hammond PS (1999) Movements and foraging areas of grey seals in the North Sea. J Appl Ecol 36:573–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell BJ, Lonergan ME, Dietz R (2012) Interactions between seals and offshore wind farms. The Crown Estates Report 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Nøttestad L, Ferno A, Mackinson S, Pitcher TJ, Misund OA (2002) How whales influence herring school dynamics in a cold-front area of the Norwegian Sea. ICES J Mar Sci 59:393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson WJ, Greene CR, Malme CI, Thompson DH, Moore SE, Wursig B (1991) Effects of noise on marine mammals. LGL Ecological Research Association Inc., TX, for the US Department of the Interior

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridoux V, Guinet C, Liret C, Creton P, Steenstrup R, Beauplet G (1997) A video sonar as a new tool to study marine mammals in the wild: measurements of dolphin swimming speed. Mar Mamm Sci 13:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiomi K, Narazaki T, Sato K, Shimatani K, Arai N, Ponganis PJ, Miyazaki N (2010) Data-processing artefacts in three-dimensional dive path reconstruction from geomagnetic and acceleration data. Aquat Biol 8:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiomi K, Sato K, Mitamura H, Arai N, Naito Y, Ponganis PJ (2008) Effect of ocean current on the dead-reckoning estimation of 3-D dive paths of emperor penguins. Aquat Biol 3:265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Similä T, Ugarte F (1993) Surface and underwater observations of cooperatively feeding killer whales in northern Norway. Can J Zool 71:1494–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RG, Greene CH, Kastak D et al (2007) Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquat Mamm 33:411–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveegaard S, Teilmann J, Tougaard J, Dietz R, Mouritsen KN, Desportes G, Siebert U (2011) High-density areas for harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) identified by satellite tracking. Mar Mamm Sci 27:230–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorner JE (1990). Approaches to sonar beamforming. In Southern Tier Technical Conference; Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE, pp 69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack PL, Zimmer WMX, Moretti D, Southall BL, Claridge DE, Durban JW, Clark CW et al (2011) Beaked whales respond to simulated and actual Navy sonar. PLoS ONE 6:e17009. doi:17010.11371/journal.pone.0017009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villadsgaard A, Wahlberg M, Tougaard J (2007) Echolocation signals of wild harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena. J Exp Biol 210:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins WA, Schevill WE (1972) Sound source location by arrival-times on a non-rigid three-dimensional hydrophone array. Deep-Sea Res 19:691–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B, Batty RS, Daunt F, Carter C (2007) Collision risks between marine renewable energy devices and mammals, fish, and diving birds. Report to the Scottish Executive Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Scotland PA37 1QA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, KY16 8LB, St Andrews, Fife, UK

    Gordon D. Hastie, Douglas M. Gillespie, Jonathan C. D. Gordon, Jamie D. J. Macaulay & Bernie J. McConnell

  2. SMRU Marine Ltd, New Technology Centre, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, KY16 9SR, St Andrews, Fife, UK

    Gordon D. Hastie & Carol E. Sparling

Authors
  1. Gordon D. Hastie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas M. Gillespie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan C. D. Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jamie D. J. Macaulay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bernie J. McConnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carol E. Sparling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon D. Hastie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Aberdeen, Newburgh, United Kingdom

    Mark A. Shields

  2. A&B Word Ltd, Halesworth, Suffolk, United Kingdom

    Andrew I.L. Payne

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hastie, G., Gillespie, D., Gordon, J., Macaulay, J., McConnell, B., Sparling, C. (2014). Tracking Technologies for Quantifying Marine Mammal Interactions with Tidal Turbines: Pitfalls and Possibilities. In: Shields, M., Payne, A. (eds) Marine Renewable Energy Technology and Environmental Interactions. Humanity and the Sea. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8002-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation