Skip to main content

Experiences with Fisheries Co-Management in North America

  • Chapter
The Fisheries Co-management Experience

Part of the book series: Fish and Fisheries Series ((FIFI,volume 26))

Abstract

The authors of this chapter focussed first on the question of who was using the term co-management in North America and what was meant by it. We used the definition proposed by the editors of this book: ‘an arrangement where responsibility for resource management is shared between the government and user groups’ (Sen and Nielsen, 1996). However, much of our discussion soon shifted into a comparison of power sharing in Canada and the United States, particularly who has decision-making authority over fisheries resources and how this changes over time. In discussing the ideal conditions for government user cooperation and a mutual willingness to support local governance, the idea of Jeffersonian Democracy came to mind. Jefferson envisioned a national government limited purely to national concerns and subsequent divisions into state, county and township governments such that ‘... each might do for itself what concerns itself directly, and what it can so much better do than a distant authority’ (McHugh, 1972).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berkes, Fikret (1989) ‘Co-Management and the James Bay Agreement.’ Pp. 181–208 in Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development, edited by E. Pinkerton. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, Fikret; Mahon, Robin; McConney, Patrick; Pollnac, Richard; and Pomeroy, Robert (2001) Managing Small-Scale Fisheries, Alternative Directions and Methods, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Arthur (1998) The Fundy Fixed Gear Council: Implementing a Community Quota. Pp 59–61 in Managing Our Fisheries, Managing Ourselves, edited by Loucks, L, Charles, T. and Butler, M. Halifax, N.S.: Gorsebrook Research Institute for Atlantic Canada Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCN (1999) ‘Creative Solutions for Coastal Economic Development.’ in 1999 Conference of Coastal Communities, edited by E. E. Tamm. Richmond, British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, Anthony (2001) Sustainable Fisheries Systems, vol. Series 5, Edited by T. J. Pitcher. Osney Mead, Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Fay G. (1986) Treaties on Trial: The Continuing Controversy over Northwest Indian Fishing Rights. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, Richard A. (1963) Politics and Conservation, The Decline of the Alaska Salmon, Harper and Row, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOC (2001) Fisheries of the United States, 2000, Current Fisheries Statistics No. 2000, US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, NMFS, Silver Spring, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feit, Harvey (1988) ‘Self-management and State-management: Forms of Knowing and Managing Northern Wildlife.’ Pp. 72–91 in Traditional Knowledge and Renewable Resources Management in Northern Regions, edited by M. M. R. Freeman and L. N. Carbyn. Edmonton: Boreal Institute for Northern Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (2000) ‘Scotia-Fundy Offshore Scallop Integrated Fisheries Management Plan, Maritime Region’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginter, Jay J. C. (1995) The Alaska community development quota fisheries management programme,’ in Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 28, nos. 1–3, pp 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, L. (1998) Sambro Community Quota Fisheries Management: A Case of Innovative Community Based Decision Making.’ Pp. 54–58 in Managing our Fisheries, Managing Ourselves, edited by L. Loucks, T. Charles, and M. Butler. Halifax, N.S.: Gorsebrook Research Institute for Atlantic Canada Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, J. L. (1972) ‘Jeffersonian Democracy and the Fisheries,’ in: World Fisheries Policy, Multidisciplinary Views, Brian J. Rothschild, Editor, University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 134–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • NE Fisheries Management Council (2000) ‘Scallop Fishery Management Plan SAFE Report ( Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation)’, Gloucester, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • NMFS (1992) Federal Register notice published in vol. 57, page 54936, on 23 November 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999) The Community Development Quota Programme in Alaska, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, Evelyn (1989) ‘Introduction: Attaining Better Fisheries Management Through Co-Management: Prospects, Problems, and Propositions.’ Pp. 3–33 in Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Directions for Improved Management and Community Development, edited by E. Pinkerton. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, Evelyn and Keitlah, Nelson (1990) ‘The Point No Point Council: Innovations by an Inter-Tribal Fisheries Management Cooperative.’ School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, Robert (2001) ‘The Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery in the USA and Canada: A Natural Experiment in Fisheries Management Regimes.’ Marine Policy Centre of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Arthur, Jr. (1971) ‘Is it Jeffersonian?’ in: New York Times, Saturday, January 30, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Sevaly and Nielsen, Jesper Raakjær (1997) ‘Commentary on ‘Fisheries Co-Management: A Comparative Analysis’.’ Marine Policy 21, 545–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, Sara (1998) Constructing Cooperation: The Evolution of Institutions of Co-management. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, Kate (1993) Coming Out of Hibernation: The Canadian Public Trust Doctrine, unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James A. (2002) ‘Scientific uncertainty, complex systems and the design of common pool institutions’. In The Drama of the Commons. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P.C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber, eds. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loucks, L., Wilson, J.A., Ginter, J.J.C. (2003). Experiences with Fisheries Co-Management in North America. In: Wilson, D.C., Nielsen, J.R., Degnbol, P. (eds) The Fisheries Co-management Experience. Fish and Fisheries Series, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3323-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3323-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6344-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3323-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics