Skip to main content

Construal Processes in Preference Assessment

  • Chapter
Elicitation of Preferences

Abstract

Interpreting people’s preferences requires understanding how they have construed their tasks, interpreting the proposed alternatives in the context where the evaluation is being made. With stylized experimental or survey choices, researchers’ challenge is typically identifying the features that people add in order to make their task real enough to answer (i.e., how they read between the lines). With rich “real world” choices, researchers’ challenge is typically identifying the features that people neglect, as they reduce their task to manageable complexity (i.e., which lines they choose to read). In either case, if people misunderstand or mistrust the stated transaction, they may evaluate a different offer than the one that was proposed. Such misconstruals are a nuisance for investigators, insofar as dealing with them delays the measurements that motivated the research. However, they can also provide an opportunity, by focusing attention on how people give meaning to choice situations. This article describes procedures for studying construal processes, strategies for getting people to answer the questions that interest researchers, and options for interpreting responses when people construe questions differently than was intended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, G. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, A., M. G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and D. Read. (1994). “What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Part 1. Mental models,” Risk Analysis 14, 959–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., W. M. Hangmann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Rudd, and V. K. Smith. (1994). “Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight,” NOAA Contract No. 50-DGNC-1-D0007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemen, R. (1991). Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Boston: PWS-Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. and B. Corrigan. (1974). “Linear Models in Decision Making,” Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, W. H., V. K. Smith, and A. Fisher. (1987). “Option Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvement: A Contingent Valuation Study for the Monongahela River,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14, 248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowlatabadi, H. and M. G. Morgan, (2000). ICAM: Integrated Assessment of Global Change,book manuscript in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. C. and G. T. Cvetkovich, (1995). Social Trust. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, A. and H. Simon. (1994). Verbal Reports as Data, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). “Hindsight # foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment under Uncertainty Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 104, 288–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1991). “Value Elicitation: Is There Anything in There? American Psychologist 46, 835–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1992). “Giving Advice: Decision Theory Perspectives on Sexual Assault,” American Psychologist, 47, 577–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1996). “The Real World: What Good Is It?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65, 232–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1997). “What Do Psychologists Want? Contingent Valuation as a Special Case of Asking Questions.” In W. Pommerehne, N. Schwarz and R. Kopp (eds.), Determining the Value of Nonmarketed Goods, pp. 189–217. New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (in press). “Why (Cancer) Risk Communication Can Be Hard,” Journal of National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., A. Bostrom, and M. J. Quadrel. (1997). “Risk Perception and Communication.” In R. Detels, J. McEwen, and G. Omenn (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Public Health, pp. 987–1002. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., J. Downs, and W. Bruine de Bruin. (1998). “Adolescent Vulnerability: A Framework for Behavioral Interventions,” Applied and Preventive Psychology 7, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. and L. Furby. (1986). “A Review and Critique of Tolley, Randall et al. ”Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in the Eastern United States,“ ERI Technical Report 86–8. Eugene, OR: Eugene Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. and L. Furby. (1988). “Measuring Values: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Transactions,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 147–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., M. J. Quadrel, M. Kamlet, G. Loewenstein, R. Dawes, P. Fischbeck, S. Klepper, J. Leland, and P. Stroh. (1993). “Embedding Effects: Stimulus Representation and Response Modes,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein. (1980). “Knowing What You Want: Measuring Labile Values.” In T. Wallsten (ed.), Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior, pp. 117–141. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. and C. Charles. (1995). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumham, A. (1989). Intuitive Theories. London: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G. T. and P. Stern. (1996). Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., R. Vallone, and A. Tversky. (1985). “The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17, 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E. (1997). “The Gambler’s Fallacy,” Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic. (1993). “Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). “Logic and Conversation.” In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: Dickenson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L. and R. T. Zacks. (1984). “Automatic and Effortful Processes in Memory,” Journal of Experiment Psychology: General 108, 356–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J. (1990). “Conversational Processes and Causal Explanation,” Psychological Bulletin 107, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. A. (1989). “Knowledge Maps,” Management Science 35, 903–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. K. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linville, P. W., G. W. Fischer, and B. Fischhoff. (1993). “AIDS Risk Perceptions and Decision Biases.” In J. B. Pryor and G. D. Reeder (eds.), The Social Psychology of HIV Infection, pp. 5–38. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, L. (1982). “Doing the Impossible,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 8, 626–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W. (1969). “Suspiciousness of Experimenter’s Intent,” In R. Rosenthal and R. L. Rosnow (eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G. (1995). “Climate Change: A Citizens Guide,” Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom, L. Lave, and C. J. Atman. (1992). “Communicating Risk to the Public,” Environmental Science and Technology 26, 2048–2056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1982). Survey Measure of Subjective Phenomena. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). Understanding Risk. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E. and T. D. Wilson. (1977). “Telling More Than We Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,” Psychological Review 84, 231–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., J. R. Bettman, and D. A. Schkade. (1999). “Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. R. and L. R. Beach. (1967). “Man as an Intuitive Statistician,” Psychological Bulletin 69 (1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in Quantifying Judgment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D., A. Bostrom, M. G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and T. Smuts. (1994). “What Do People Know about Global Climate Change? Part 2. Survey Studies of Educated Laypeople,” Risk Analysis, 14, 971–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. and R. L. Rosnow. (eds.) (1969). Artifact in Behavioral Research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schkade, D. A. and J. W. Payne. (1993). “Where Do the Numbers Come From? How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions.” In J. A. Hausman (ed.), Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, pp. 271–293. Boston: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schkade, D. A. and J. W. Payne. (1994). “How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 88–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriver, K. A. (1989). “Evaluating Text Quality: The Continuum from Text-Focused to Reader-Focused Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 32, 238–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1997). Context Effects in Survey Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schwarz, N. (1999). “Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers,” American Psychologist, 54, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaklee, H. and B. Fischhoff. (1990). “The Psychology of Contraceptive Surprises: Judging the Cumulative Risk of Contraceptive Failure,” Journal of Applied Psychology 20, 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein, (1971). “Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 649–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., and I. Altman, (eds.) (1987). Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 2 Vols. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley, G., A. Randall, et al. (1986). “Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in the Eastern United States,” Report to the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tune, G. S. (1964). “Response Preferences: A Review of Some Relevant Literature,” Psychological Bulletin, 61, 286–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, (1974). “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science 185, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, N. and B. Fischhoff, (1999). “Social Context and Environmental Valuations,” Manuscript under editorial review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. R. (1998). “How Many Scientific Discoveries Have Been Lost by Ignoring Modern Statistical Methods?” American Psychologist, 53, 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., D. J. Lisle, J. W. Schooler, S. D. Hodges, K. J. Klaaren, and S. J. LaFleur. (1993). “Introspecting About Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. and M. Spranca. (1997). “Protected Values,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. and L. A. Cox, Jr. (1985). “Conceptual Framework for Benefits Assessment.” In J. Bentkover, V. Covello, and J. Mumpower (eds.), Benefits Assessment: The State of the Art. Dordrecht: Kluwer, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., N. Welch, and S. Frederick. (1999). “Construal Processes in Preference Assessment,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R., S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic. (1993). “Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon, K. and D. Wehrung. (1986). Taking Risks. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schkade, D. A. and J. W. Payne. (1994). “How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 88–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fischhoff, B., Welch, N., Frederick, S., Dominitz, J., McDaniels, T.L. (1999). Construal Processes in Preference Assessment. In: Fischhoff, B., Manski, C.F. (eds) Elicitation of Preferences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5776-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1406-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics