Skip to main content

Confucian and Western Notions of Human Need and Agency: Health Care and Biomedical Ethics in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
Bioethics: Asian Perspectives

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((ASBP,volume 80))

Abstract

Twentieth century Western liberal democracies have been largely dominated by two broad principles upon which the allocation and distribution of resources, particularly public resources, are based. These are the principle of right and the principle of need (see for example Wiggins, 1998; Doyal & Gough, 1991; Plant, 1990, 1986; Miller, 1976; Rawls, 1972). They provide the ethical framework for determining societal priorities, aiding professional judgment, grounding entitlements and reconciling claims. They also shape our decision-making and social legislation for public intervention, particularly in welfare choices and health care policies (Tao and Drover, 1997).

The author wishes to register a note of deep appreciation to the Centre for Modem Chinese Studies (philosophy project) and to St. Hugh’s College at University of Oxford, UK, where I was offered visiting fellowships during the period of my sabbatical leave from the City University of Hong Kong from April 1999 to December 1999 where I developed and completed this paper under their invaluable support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Au, Derrick K.S. (2000). ‘Brain injury, brain degeneration, and loss of personhood.’ In: Gerhold K. Becker (Ed.), The Moral Status of Persons: Perspectives on Bioethics (pp. 209–218 ). Amsterdam: Athanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom (1998). ‘Personhood, autonomy, and rights.’ Paper presented at the International Symposium on Bioethics and the Concept of Person. Centre for Applied Ethics, Hong Kong Baptist University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Lawrence (1986). Reciprocity. London: Routlege and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah (1971). ‘Two concepts of liberty.’ In I. Berlin (Ed.), Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen (1984). ‘The right to a decent minimum of health care,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs. 13, 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen (2001). ‘Advance directives and the personal identity problem.’ In: John Harris (Ed.)., Bioethics (pp. 131–156 ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Ho-Mun (forthcoming, 2004). ‘Sharing death and dying, advance directives, autonomy and the family.’Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Norman (2001). ‘Health-care needs and distributive justice’ In: John Harris (Ed.), Bioethics (pp. 319–346 ). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Stefano, Christine (1996). ‘Autonomy is the light of difference.’ In: Nancy J. Hirschmann and Christine di Stefano (Eds.), Revisioning the Political ( 95–116 ). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, Len and Gough, Ian (1991). A Theory of Needs. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Gerald (1997). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englehardt, H. Tristram Jr. (2002). ‘Morality, universality, and particularity: Rethinking the role of community in the foundations of bioethics.’ In: Julia Tao Lai Po-wah (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics (pp. 19–40 ). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel (1972). ‘The idea of a free man.’ In: R.F. Dearden (Ed.), Education and the Development of Freedom (pp. 3–29 ). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel (1989). ‘Autonomy.’ In: John Christman (Ed.), The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan (1982). Human Rights: Essays on Justification and Application. Chicago: Chicago University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jean (1988). ‘Autonomy and identity in feminist thinking.’ In: Morwenna Griffiths and Margaret Whitford (Eds.), Feminist Perspectives in Philosophy (pp. 90–108 ). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwig, John (1998). ‘Dying at the right time: Reflections on (un)assisted suicide.’ In: Hugh LaFollette (Ed.), Ethics in Practice: An Anthology (pp. 53–65 ). Massachusetts: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia (1993). Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society and Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Honderich, Ted (Ed.) (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschmann, Nancy J. (1996). ‘Revisioning freedom: Relationship, context, and the politics of empowerment.’ In: Nancy J. Hirschmann and Christine Di Stefano (Eds.), Revisioning the Political (pp. 51–74 ). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas (1968). Leviathan. C.B. Macpherson (Ed.). New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Ambrose (1985). ‘The individual and group in Confucianism: A relational perspective. In: Donald Munro (Ed.), Individualism and Holism: Studies in Confucian and Taoist Values (pp. 57–70 ). University of Michigan: Ann Arbor Centre for Chinese Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D.C. (Trans.) (1979). Confucius: The Analects. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, James (Trans.) (1960). The Chinese Classics. Volume II: The Works of Mencius. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John (1988). Two Treatises of Government. Peter Laslett (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, John (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Peter Nidditch (Ed., with an Introduction, Critical Apparatus and Glossary). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Rita C. (1998). ‘A care approach.’ In: Helga Kuhse and Peter Singer (Eds.), A Companion to Bioethics (pp. 98–105 ). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart (1991). On Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Bruce (1981). ‘Autonomy and the refusal of lifesaving treatment,’ The Hastings Center Report 22 (9), 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David (1976). Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel (1984). Caring: A Feminist Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Orlando (1991). Freedom: Freedom in the Making of Western Culture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, Raymond, Lesser, H. and Taylor-Gooby, Peter (1980). Political Philosophy and Social Welfare. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, Raymond (1990). ‘Citizenship and rights.’ In: lEA (ed.), Citizenship and Rights in Thatcher’s Britain: Two Views. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, Raymond (1986). ‘Needs, agency and rights.’ In: C. Sampford and J. Law (Eds.), Law, Rights and the Welfare State. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, Raymond (1991). Modern Political Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, Sara (1998). ‘Reproductive ethics.’ In Qiu Renzong, Jin Yihong and Wan Yanguang (Eds.), Chinese Women and Feminist Thought. Beijing: China Social Science Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Julia (1999). ‘Does it really care? A critique of the Harvard Report for Health Care Reform in Hong Kong,’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 24 (6), 571–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Julia (1998). ‘Confucianism.’ In: Ruth Chadwick (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (pp. 597608 ). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Julia (1995). ‘The moral foundation of welfare in Chinese society: Between virtues and rights.’ In: Gerhold Becker (Ed.), Ethics in Business and Society: Chinese and Western Perspectives (pp. 9–24 ). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Julia and Drover, Glenn (1997). ‘Chinese and Western notions of need,’ Critical Social Policy 17 (1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1989). ‘Cross purposes: The liberal-communitarian debate.’ In: Nancy Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Judith Jarvis (2001). ‘A defence of abortion.’ In: John Harris (Ed.), Bioethics (pp. 25–41 ). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan (1999). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiming, Tu (1985). ‘Selfhood and otherness: The father-son relationship in Confucian thought.’ In: Confucian Thought: Selfhood as a Creative Transformation (pp. 113–130 ). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Robin (1992). ‘Political theory and gender.’ Reprinted in: John Arthur and William H. Shaw (Eds.), Social and Political Philosophy (pp. 569–593 ). Engelwood: NJ. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, David (1998). Needs, Values, Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, John C.H. (1967). ‘The status of the individual in the political and legal tradition of old and new China.’ In: Charles Moore (Ed.), The Chinese Mind (pp. 340–364 ). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, Takao (1999). ‘Recent development of bioethics in Japanese style.’ Paper presented at the International Conference on Bioethics Individual, Community and Society: Bioethics in the Third Millennium, Centre for Comparative Public Management and Social Policy, City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, Chan See (1999). ‘Disputes on the One thread of Chung-Shu, “ Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Po-Wah, J.T.L. (2003). Confucian and Western Notions of Human Need and Agency: Health Care and Biomedical Ethics in the Twenty-First Century. In: Qiu, RZ. (eds) Bioethics: Asian Perspectives. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0419-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0419-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6509-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0419-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics