Skip to main content

Cloning Humans? — Some Moral Considerations

  • Chapter
Bioethics: Asian Perspectives

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((ASBP,volume 80))

  • 631 Accesses

Abstract

The successful cloning of a Scottish ewe (“Dolly”) by somatic cell nuclear transfer technology announced in February 1997 has rendered human cloning viable (Wilmut et al., 1997).1 This possibility has aroused the deep and widespread concern of academics, professionals, legislators, governments and the general public. After the news of Dolly became public, U.S. President Bill Clinton immediately issued a moratorium on the use of Federal funds for programs associated with human cloning research, and further requested the National Bioethics Advisory Commission to submit a report within ninety days. On January 12, 1998, nineteen European nations signed a treaty that prohibits human cloning because it is “contrary to human dignity and thus constitutes a misuse of biology and medicine.”2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Sources in Chinese (in Hanyupinyin)

  • Guo, Zhaojiang (1997). ‘Moral reflections on the cloned sheep (Dui kelong mian yang de lunli sikao),’ Chinese Medical Ethics (Zhongguo Yixue Lunlixue), 53, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Ping (1997). Cloning Shocks (Kelong Zhenhan). Beijing: Economic Journal’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Renzong (1997). ‘Cloning technology and its moral implications (Kelong jishu ji qi lunli hanyi)’, Moral Studies (Lunlixue), 8, 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Qingsong (1997). ‘Moral considerations of human cloning (Lun fuzhiren de lunli wenti),’ Philosophy Magazine (Zhexue Zazhi), 21, 233–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Guangdong (1997). ‘Human cloning revisited (Ye tan kelong),’ Science Monthly (Kexue Yuebao) 28, 380–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Qiaojian (1997). ‘Is human cloning really morally unacceptable? (Kelongren zai lunli daode shang zhende bu keyi jieshou ma?),’ Ethics (Lunlixue), 12, 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Juzheng (1997). ‘The Pandora’s box of cloning technology: moral reflections after the shock of Dolly (Fuzhi keji de panduola hezi: Taoli zhenhan xia de lunli fansi),’ Contemporary (Dangdai), 119, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

Sources in English

  • Annas, George J. (1990). ‘Outrageous fortune: Selling other people’s cells,’ Hastings Center Report (November/December), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Ronald (1997). ‘The twin paradox,’ Reason, 29 (May), 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, Martin (1970). 1 and Thou, English Translation, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Declan & Wadman, Meredith (1997). ‘Calls for cloning ban sell science short,’ Nature, 386, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, David M. (1997). ‘An absence of love.’ In: Ronald Cole-Turner (Ed.), Human Cloning: Religious Responses (pp. 66–77 ). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Ruth (1982). ‘Cloning,’ Philosophy, 57, 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Ruth (1997). ‘The philosophy of the right to know and the right not to know.’ In: Ruth Chadwick et al. (Eds.), The Right to Know and the Right not to Know (pp. 13–22 ). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Ruth et al. (Eds.) (1997). The Right to Know and the Right not to Know. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole-Turner, Ronald (Ed.) (1997). Human Cloning: Religious Responses. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Council of Ethics (1993). Ethics and the Mapping of the Human Genome. Copenhagen: Danish Council of Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Anthony & John Harris (Eds.) (1990). Experiments on Embryos. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Donald (Ed.) (1996). Conceiving the Embryo: Ethics, Law and Practice in Human Embryology. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Mark W.J. (1990). ‘Contemporary and future possibilities’, In: A. Dyson & J. Harris (Eds.), Experiments on Embryos (pp. 6–26 ). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, Jonathan (1989). Ethics of New Reproductive Technologies: The Glover Report to the European Commission. DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, David (1986). ‘Are “wrongful life” claims philosophically valid?’ Israel Law Review, 21, 574–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd, David (1992). Genetics: Moral Issues in the Creation of People. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Soren: 1998, ‘A life in the shadow: One reason why we should not clone humans,’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 7, 160–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochemsen, Henk (1997). ‘Reducing people to genetics.’ In: John Kilner et al. (Eds.), Genetic Ethics: Do the Ends Justify the Genes? (pp. 75–83 ). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, Leon R. (1997). ‘The wisdom of repugnance,’ New Republic, 216 (22), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilner, John F. et al. (eds.) (1997). Genetic Ethics: Do the Ends Justify the Genes? Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbrell, Andrew (1994). ‘Biological patents affront human values’, In O’Neill (ed.), Biomedical Ethics: Opposing Viewpoints (pp. 17–24 ). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiuger, Jeffrey (1997). ‘Will we follow the sheep?’ Time, 149 (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebacqz, Karen (1997). ‘Genes, justice, and clones.’ In: R. Cole-Turner (Ed.), Human Cloning: Religious Responses (pp. 49–57 ). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meilaender, Gilbert (1997). ‘Begetting and cloning (Paper Presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission on March 13, 1997)’, First Things, 74 (June/July), 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1997). Cloning Human Beings, 2 Volumes, [Volume 1: Report and Recommendations of the National BioethicsAdvisory Commission; Volume 2: Commissioned Papers]. US Government Printing Office: Rockville, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. Robert (1994). On the New Frontiers of Genetics and Religion. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Scientist (1998). ‘Beyond the grave.’ July 18, 159, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, John (1998). ‘Human cloning would be unethical.’ In: P. Winters (ed.), Cloning (pp. 9–12 ). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan, Oliver (1984). Begotten or Made? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Terry (Ed.) (1994). Biomedical Ethics: Opposing Viewpoints, San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, Gregory E. (1997). Who’s Afraid of Human Cloning? New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorn, John (1997). ‘Cloning and the moral imperative.’ In: R. Cole-Turner (Ed.), Human Cloning: Religious Responses (pp. 35–42 ). Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines, Lisa J. (1994). ‘Biological patents promote progress.’ In: T. O’Neill (Ed.), Biomedical Ethics: Opposing Viewpoints (pp. 17–24 ). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, Paul (1970). Fabricated Man. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey Colloquium (1995). ‘The inhuman use of human beings,’ First Things, 49 (January), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, David B. (1998). The Ethics of Science: An Introduction, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossant, Janet (1997). ‘The science of animal cloning’, Paper Commissioned by National Bioethics Advisory Commission. In: National Bioethics Advisory Commission Eds.), Cloning Human Beings (Volume 2), B1- B21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, Stephen F. (1997). ‘The incentive of patents.’ In: J. Kilner et al. (eds.), Genetic Ethics: Do the Ends Justify the Genes? (pp. 113–123 ). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiels, et al. (1999). ‘Analysis of telomere lengths in cloned sheep,’ Nature, 399, 316–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter & Wells, Deane (1985). Making Babies: The New Science and Ethics of Conception. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. [Revised Edition of The Reproduction Revolution: New Ways of Making Babies,Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, Margaret S. & Marusyk, Randy W. (1990). ‘An alternative to property rights in human tissue,’ Hastings Center Report (September/October), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachbroit, Robert (1998). ‘Ethical concerns about cloning are misplaced.’ In: P. Winters (Ed.), Cloning (pp. 66–69 ). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadman, Meredith: 1997, ‘Bioethics: business booms for guides to biology’s moral maze,’ Nature, 389, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmut, Ian (1998). ‘Animals cloning experiments will be beneficial to humans (interviewed by Andrew Ross).’ In: P. Winters (Ed.), Cloning (pp. 49–53 ). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmut, Ian et al. (1997). ‘Viable offspring derived from foetal and adult mammalian cells,’ Nature, 385, 810–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Paul A. (Ed.) (1998). Cloning. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.

    Google Scholar 

Sources on the Internet

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kang, P.S. (2003). Cloning Humans? — Some Moral Considerations. In: Qiu, RZ. (eds) Bioethics: Asian Perspectives. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0419-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0419-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6509-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0419-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics