Skip to main content

Issues in the Valuation of Groundwater Benefits

  • Chapter
Agricultural Use of Groundwater

Abstract

Why do we need to put special effort into finding an aquifer’s value?1 Estimating the value of a aquifer is useful for both decisions concerning resource allocation among different users as well as long term decisions with respect to investments in restoration, conservation prevention and developing alternative water supplies. The value of an aquifer and the long-run analysis of groundwater use are strongly correlated to the problem of sustainability. It can be claimed that a society is not moving along a sustainable water resources management path if one of the following conditions hold:

  1. (a)

    the decline in the quantity and quality of available freshwater is not compensated for by more effective and efficient water services;

  2. (b)

    the costs of water services required to relax physical resources limits are subject to continuous increase over time;

  3. (c)

    there are political or social constraints which impede adoption of the institution reforms required to make freshwater resources allocation less socially inefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalla, C.W., 1990, Measuring economic losses from groundwater contamination: an investigation of household avoidance costs, Water Resources Bulletin, 26, 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdalla, C.W., 1994, Groundwater values from avoidance cost studies: implications for policy and future research, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 1062–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdalla, C.W., Roach, B.A., Epp, D.J., 1992, Valuing environmental quality changes using averting expenditures: an application to groundwater contamination, Land Economics, 68, pp. 163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qunaibet, M.H., Johnston, R.S., 1985, Municipal demand for water in Kuwait: Methodological issues and empirical results, Water Resources Research, 22, 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amigues, J.P., Gaudet, G., Moreaux, M., 1997, Rational pricing of groundwater with a growing population, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, F., Willis C., Allen, P., 1982, Estimation of substitution possibilities between water and other production inputs, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68, 647–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartik, T.J., 1988, Evaluating the benefits of non-marginal reductions in pollution using information on defensive expenditures, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(1), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, N., Easter, K.W., 1992, Dynamic supply from a common property resources: Water diversions from the Great Lakes, Natural Resource Modeling, 6, 343–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, N., 1995, The value of institutional change in moving from central planning to a market system: Implications from the Israeli water sector, Agricultural Economics, 12, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, N., Zeitouni, N., Schecter, M., 1996, Reallocating water resources in the Middle East through market mechanisms, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 12(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W., 1995, Small Is Stupid: Blowing the Whistle on the Greens, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, G.C., Whitehead, J.C., 1995, Existence value, contingent valuation, and natural resources damages assessment, Growth and Change, 26(4), 573–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggess, W., Lacewell, R., Zilberman, D., 1993, Economics of water use in agriculture, in: Carlson, G.A., Zilberman, D., Miranowski, J.A., eds., Agricultural and Environmental Resource Economics, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, J.F., Young, R.A., Modeling intrastate and interstate markets for Colorado River water resources, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 66–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, K.J., Poe, G.L., Bergstrom, J.C., 1994, What do we know about groundwater values? Preliminary implications from a meta-analysis of contingent-valuation studies, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 1055–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, O.R., 1970, Groundwater storage control under institutional restrictions, Water Resources Research, 6(6), 1540–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, P.H., Boland, J.J., 1980, Short run and long run effects of price on municipal water use, Water Resources Research, 16, 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, B., 1989, Estimating the value of water in alternative uses, Natural Resources Journal, 29, 511–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, T.D., Forster, B.A, Shogren, J.F., 1991, Valuing potential groundwater protection benefits, Water Resources Research, 27, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, S.R., Feather, P.M., Hellestein, D.R., 1995, The Benefits of Protecting Rural Water Quality. An Empirical Analysis, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 701, United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R.G, McFarland, J.W., 1974, Groundwater management and salinity control, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 10, 909–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.E., On Wilfred Beckerman’s critique of sustainable development, Environmental Values, 4, 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., Letey, J., 1994, Evaluation of management and policy issues related to irrigation and agricultural crops, in: Tanji, K.K., Yaron, D., eds., Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences 22, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S.F., 1988, Option prices for groundwater protection, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15, 475–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinerman, E., Knapp, K.C., 1983, Benefits from groundwater management: magnitude, sensitivity, and distribution, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(4), 703–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A.M. III, 1985, Supply uncertainty, option price, and option value, Land Economics, 61, 176–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A.M. III, 1993, The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, D., 1986, The Economic Value of Water, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisser, M., Sanchez, D.A., 1980, Competition versus optimal control in groundwater pumping, Water Resources Research, 16, 638–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gisser, M., 1983, Groundwater: focusing on the real issue, Journal of Political Economy, 91, 1001–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, E., Allen, R., Allaby, M., Davoll, J., Lawrence, S., 1972, Blueprint for survival, The Ecologist, 2, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haang, W.Y., Uri, N.D., 1990, An analytical framework for assessing the benefits and costs of policies related to protecting groundwater quality, Environment and Planning, 22, 1469–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C.W., Linaweaver, F.P., 1967, The impact of price on residential water demand and its relation to system design and price structure, Water Resources Research, 3, 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C.W., 1982, The impact of price on residential water demand: some new insights. Water Resources Research, 18(4), 713–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howeitt, R.E., Vaux, H., 1995, Competing demands for California’s scarce water, in: Dinar, A, Loehman, E.T., eds., Water quantity/quality management and conflict resolution: institutions, processes, and economic analyses. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.L., Adams, R.M., Perry, G.M., 1991, The on-farm costs of reducing groundwater pollution, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1063–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.V., Morris, J.R., 1984, Instrumental price estimates and residential water demand, Water Resources Research, 20, 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan J.L., Elnagheeb, A.H., 1993, Willingness to pay for improvement in drinking water quality, Water Resources Research, 29, 237–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C.S., Moore, M.R., Hanchar, J.J., Nieswiodomy, M., 1989, A dynamic model of adaptation to resource depletion: theory and an application to groundwater mining, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 66–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, I., Russel C.S., eds., 1984, Modeling Water Demands, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, K.C., Olson, L.J., 1995, The economics of conjunctive groundwater management with stochastic surface supplies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 340–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krulce, D.L., Rumasset, J.A., Wilson, T., 1997, Optimal management of a renewable and replaceable resource: the case of coastal groundwater, American Journal of Agricultuaral Economics, 79, 1218–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulshreshtha, S.N., 1994, Economic Value of Groundwater in the Assiniboine Delta Aquifer in Manitoba. Social Science Series no. 29. Environmental Conservation Service. Ottawa, Ontario: Minister of Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarl, B.A., 1982, Cropping activities in agricultural sectors: a methodological proposal, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(4), 768–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.R., Dinar, A., 1995, Water and land as quantity-rationed inputs in California agricultural empirical tests and water policy implications, Land Economics, 71(4), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letey, J., 1991, Crop-water production functions and the problems of drainage and salinity, in: Dinar, A., Zilberman, D., eds., The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, E., Zilberman, D., Bogen, K.T., 1989, Regulating environmental health risks under uncertainty: groundwater contamination in California, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 17, 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, P., Barrows, R., 1990, Groundwater pollution effects on residential property values, Portage County, Wisconsin, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 45, 346–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D., Lazo, J.K., Waldman, D.M., Doyle, J.K. Elliott, S.R., Irwin, J.R., 1992, Methods for measuring non-use values: a contingent valuation study of groundwater cleanup, Mimeo, Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado. USEPA no. CR-815183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.C., Carson, R.T., 1989, Using Survey to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.R., Dinar, A., 1995, Water and land as quantity-rationed inputs in California agriculture empirical tests and water policy implications, Land Economics, 71(4), 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M.J., 1983, Optimal groundwater depletion with interdependent nonrenewable and renewable resources, Water Resources Research, 19, 1091–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, 1997, Valuing Ground Water: Economic Concepts and Approaches, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, D.H., 1990, ‘Stragedy’ of the commons, Natural Resource Modeling, 4, 521–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G., 1995, Evaluating ecosystem states: two competing paradigms, Ecological Economics, 14, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, G.B., Toman, M.A., 1997, Sustainability: ecological and economic perspectives, Land Economics, 73, 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, G.W., Rabinowitz, H., 1993, Groundwater contamination: its effects on property values and cities, Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, 473–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poe, G.L., 1998, Valuation of groundwater quality: contingent values, public policy needs, and damage functions, ARME Working Paper 97–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.R., 1991, The value of groundwater protection: willingness to pay information and their utilization by local government decision makers. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J.R., Allee, D.J., McClintock, C., 1994, Groundwater protection benefits and local community planning: impact of contingent valuation information, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 1068–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, J., Soderqvist, T., 1996, On estimating the benefits of groundwater protection: a contingent valuation study in Milan, FEEM Working Paper 53.96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A., 1994, A difficulty with the travel cost method, Land Economics, 70, 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A., Hoehn, J.P., Brookshire, D.S., 1983, Contingent valuation surveys for evaluating environmental assets, Natural Resources Journal, 23(3), 635–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raucher, R.L., 1986, The benefits and costs of policies related to groundwater contamination, Land Economics, 62, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzetti, S., 1992, Estimating the structure of industrial water demands: the case of Canadian manufacturing, Land Economics, 68, 396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizaiza, O.S.A., 1991, Residential water usage: a case study of the major cities in the western region of Saudi Arabia, Water Resources Research, 28, 667–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segerson, K., 1994, The benefits of groundwater protection: discussion, American Agricultural Economics, 76, 1076–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, S.D., Lindsay, B.E., 1990, The willingness to pay for groundwater protection, Water Resources Research, 26, 1869–1875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenger, A., Willinger, M., 1998, Preservation value for groundwater quality in a large aquifer: a contingent-valuation study of the Alsatian aquifer, Journal of Environmental Management, 53, 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., Bergstrom, J.C., Dorfman, J.H., 1992, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24(2), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunding, D., 1995, Flexible technology and the cost of improving groundwater quality, Natural Resource Modeling, 9(2), 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyak, M., 1996, An Assessment of the Ecological and Economic Value of Groundwater: Town of Caledon Case Study. Canada Center for Inland Waters, Ontario Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsur, Y., Zemel, A., 1995, Uncertainty and irreversibility in groundwater resource management, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsur, Y., Graham-Tomasi, T., 1991, The buffer value of groundwater with stochastic surface water supplies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21, 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1995, A Framework for Measuring the Economic Benefits of Ground Water. Office of Water, EPA 230-B-95–003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, S.N., 1997, Dynamic optimization of nitrogen use when groundwater contamination is internalized at the standard in the long run, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 931–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, S.N., Wall, D.B., 1998, Benefit-cost analysis of best management practices implemented to control nitrate contamination of groundwater, Water Resources Research, 34, 497–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R.A., Gray, S.L., 1985, Input-output models, economic surplus, and the evaluation of state or regional water plans, Water Resources Research, 21, 1819–1823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zekter, I.S., Belousova, A.P., Dudov, V.Yu., 1995, Regional Assessment and Mapping of Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination, Environmental Geology, 25, 225–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker, N., Tonin, S. (2001). Issues in the Valuation of Groundwater Benefits. In: Dosi, C. (eds) Agricultural Use of Groundwater. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9781-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9781-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5650-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9781-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics