Skip to main content

Von Hayek, Bergmann, and Mayerhöfer

  • Chapter
Ernst Mach’s Vienna 1895–1930

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 218))

  • 272 Accesses

Abstract

My task is exclusively to bear witness to how penetrating Ernst Mach’s influence already was before the year 1922 when Moritz Schlick formed the so-called “Vienna Circle”. It so happens that I studied in my own hometown Vienna precisely three years from 1918 until 1921, and that what passed for philosophical discussion revolved essentially around Mach’s ideas. Vienna as a whole was already extraordinarily inclined toward philosophy of natural science.2 Apart from Heinrich Gomperz,3 Adolf Stöhr4 also taught in Vienna and both men followed a similar line, and Robert Reininger5 was at the very least friendly toward such an outlook.

Friedich von Hayek (1899–1992) was an Austro-English economist, philosopher, and Noberl prizewinner. He is often considered a late representative of the Austrian School of Economics largely begun by Carl Menger. This is a translation of Hayek’s “Diskussionsbemerkungen über Ernst Mach und das sozialwissenschaftliche Denken in Wien”, Symposium aus Anlass des 50. Todestages von Ernst Mach, Ernst Mach Institut: Freiburg im Breisgau, 1966, pp. 41–44. The footnotes in this chapter have been added by the editors.

Richard A venarius (1843–1896) taught in Zürich from 1877 until his dezth where his philosophy which except for difficult terminology was very similar to that of Ernst Mach influenced many Russian students which in turn raised the ire of Plechanov and Lenin. His main work Kritik der reinen Erfahrung, two volumes, was first publisched in 1888 and republished in 1908, that is, on the eve of Lenin’s sharp reply in 1909.

Gustav Bergmann (1905- ) who from 1938 would teach at the University of Iowa seems to have passed through several stages in his philosophy from phenomenalism, to phenomenology, to a kind of “realism” which would incorporate the ideal languages of linguistic philosophy with a revived concern with epistemology and ontology as if a more or less reasonable synthesis were possible. See The Metaphysics of Logical Positivism (1954) and Meaning and Existence (1960).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, Friedrich. Ernst Machs Überwindung des mechanischen Materialismus \Vien: 1918. Avenarius, Richard. Kritik der reinen Erfahrung 2 vols. Leipzig: 1888–1890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Gustay. The Metaphysics of Logical Positivism. New York: Longmans, 1954. Bergmann, Gustay. Meaning and Existence. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Gustay. “Memories of the Vienna Circle”. in Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Development. edited by F. Stadler. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1993, pp. 194–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, John. (ed.). Ernst Macht - A Deeper Look - Documents and New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, John. “Late Appendix”. Ludwig Boltzmann–His Later Life and Philosophy 1900–1906. Book Two: The Philosopher. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995, pp. 269–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, I-fans. “Logik, Mathematik, und Naturkennen”, in Unified Science, edited by B. McGuinness. Translated into English by I-Ians Kaal. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989, pp. 24–45. Hayek, Friedrich von. The Sensory Order. London und Chicago: 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • I-Iayek, Friedrich von. “Diskussionsbemerkungen fiber Ernst Mach und das sozialwissenschaftliche Denken in Wien”. Symposium aus Anlass des 50. Todestages von Ernst Mach. Freiburg in Breisgau: Ernst Mach Institut Selbstverlag, 1966, pp. 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, Gerald. “Sub-electrons, Presuppositions, and the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Dispute”. in The Scientific Imagination–Case Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 25–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, William M. The Austrian Mind. Berkeley und Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Felix. Methodology of the Social Sciences. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelson, Hans. The Doctrine of Pure Law. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, Viktor. “Nachwort”. in K.D. Heller, Ernst Mach. Wien: Sprenger Verlag, 1964, 168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, Ernst. Die Analyse der Empfindungen. 9th edition. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buch-Gesellschaft, 1987 [ 1886 ].

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerhöfer, Josef. “Ernst Machs Berufung an die Wiener Universität 1895”. Clio Medica. 2 (1967) 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerhöfer, Josef. “Ernst Mach in Wien”. Mitteilungen der österreichischen Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften 9 (1989) 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, Karl. “Memories of Moritz Schlick”. Rationality and Science, edited by E. Gadol. New York: Springer Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Richard von. Ernst Mach und die empirisiche Wissensschaftauffassung included in Unified Science,edited by B. McGuinness. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989 [1938], pp. 130–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, Friedrich. “The ‘Verein Ernst Mach’. What Was It Really?”. in Ernst Mach–A Deeper Look. edited by J. Blackmore. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992, pp. 363–377.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thirring, Hans. Der Weltfriede als psychologisches Problem. Wien: Deuticke, 1946. Thirring, Hans. Anti-Nietzsche, Anti-Spengler. Wien: A. Sexl, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirring, Hans. Atomkriedg und Weltpolitik. Wien: Danubier-Verlag, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich. Priciples of Linguistic Philosophy. edited by Rom Harré. 1965. Waismann, Friedrich. How I see Philosophy. edited by Rom Harré. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilsel, Edgar. Wissenschaft und Weltanschauung. edited by G. Mozetic. Wien: 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Hayek, F., Bergmann, G., Mayerhöfer, J. (2001). Von Hayek, Bergmann, and Mayerhöfer. In: Blackmore, J., Itagaki, R., Tanaka, S. (eds) Ernst Mach’s Vienna 1895–1930. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 218. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9690-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9690-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5752-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9690-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics