Abstract
As a response to the requirements imposed by real-world natural language processing, we argue for a design of natural language grammars and their associated parsers in which declarative knowledge about language structure and procedural knowledge about language use are equally balanced within a strictly object-oriented specification and implementation framework. In particular, we introduce fundamental message-passing protocols for object-oriented parsing, which include, besides the one for basic dependency parsing, protocols for ambiguity handling, robustness, backtracking, preferential and predictive parsing, as well as textual reference resolution. Based on an empirical evaluation, we also provide reasons for sacrificing completeness of the parse in favor of efficiency gains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agha, G. (1990). The structure and semantics of actor language. In J. W. de Bakker, W.-P. de Roever & G. Rozenberg (Eds.), Foundations of Object-Oriented Languages, Vol. 489, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1–59. Berlin: Springer.
Allen, J. F. (1993). Natural language, knowledge representation, and logical form. In M. Bates & R. M. Weischedel (Eds.), Challenges in Natural Language Processing, pp. 146–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briot, J.-P. (1989). Actalk: a testbed for classifying and designing actor languages in the Smalltalk-80 environment. In ECOOP’89 — Proceedings of the European Workshop on Object-Based Concurrent Computing, pp. 109–129. Nottingham, U.K., July 10–14, 1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bröker, N. (1998). Separating surface order and syntactic relations in a dependency grammar. In COLING/ACL’98-Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics & 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Vol. 1, pp. 174–180. Montreal, Canada, August 10–14, 1998. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Bröker, N. (1999). Eine Dependenzgrammatik zur Kopplung heterogener Wissensquellen, Vol. 405. Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. (Dissertation, Philosophy Department, Universität Freiburg, 1997).
Charniak, E. (1997). Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. In AAAI’97/IAAI’97 — Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence & 9th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, pp. 598–603. Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A., July 27–31, 1997. Menlo Park, CA & Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press & MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Church, K. W. (1980). On parsing strategies and closure. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Parasession on Topics in Interactive Discourse, pp. 107–111. Philadelphia, PA, June 19–22, 1980.
Collins, M. (1997). Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics & 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 16–23. Madrid, Spain, July 7–12, 1997. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
DeJong, G. F. (1979). Skimming Stories in Real Time: An Experiment in Integrated Understanding, (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Computer Science, Yale University. Research Report 158.
Earley, J. (1970). An efficient context-free parsing algorithm. Communications of the ACM, 13(2):94–102.
Frazier, L. (1987). Theories of sentence processing. In L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding, pp. 291–307. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grosz, B. J., A. K. Joshi & S. Weinstein (1995). Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203–225.
Hahn, U. & G. Adriaens (1994). Parallel natural language processing: background and overview. In G. Adriaens & U. Hahn (Eds.), Parallel Natural Language Processing, pp. 1–134. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hahn, U., K. Markert & M. Strube (1996). A conceptual reasoning approach to textual ellipsis. In W. Wahlster (Ed.), ECAI’96 — Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 572–576. Budapest, Hungary, August 11–16, 1996. Chichester: John Wiley.
Hahn, U. & M. Romacker (2000). Content Management in SynDiKate: How Technical Documents Are Automatically Transformed to Text Knowledge Bases. Data & Knowledge Engineering.
Hahn, U., M. Romacker & S. Schulz (1999). Discourse structures in medical reports — Watch out! The generation of referentially coherent and valid text knowledge bases in the medSynDiKate system. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 53(1): 1–28.
Hahn, U., S. Schacht & N. Bröker (1994). Concurrent, object-oriented natural language parsing: the ParseTalk model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(1/2): 179–222.
Hahn, U. & K. Schnattinger (1998). Towards text knowledge engineering. In AAAI’98/IAAI’98 — Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence & 10th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 524–531. Madison, Wisconsin, July 26–30, 1998. Menlo Park, CA & Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press & MIT Press.
Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency, Vol. 73. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Heinsohn, J., D. Kudenko, B. Nebel & H.-J. Profitlich (1994). An empirical analysis of terminological representation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 68(2):367–397.
Hobbs, J. R. & J. Bear (1990). Two principles of parse preference. In COLING ‘90 — Papers Presented at the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of COLING & the 350th Anniversary of Helsinki University, Vol. 3, pp. 162–167. Helsinki, Finland, 1990.
Huyck, C. R. & S. L. Lytinen (1993). Efficient heuristic natural language parsing. In AAAV93 — Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 386–391. Washington, D.C., July 11–15, 1993. Menlo Park, CA & Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press & MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacobs, P. S. (1990). To parse or not to parse: relation-driven text skimming. In COLING’90 — Papers Presented at the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of COLIN G & the 350th Anniversary of Helsinki University, Vol. 2, pp. 194–198. Helsinki, Finland, 1990.
Kahane, S., A. Nasr & O. Rambow (1998). Pseudo-projectivity: apolynomially parsable non-projective dependency grammar. In COLING/ACL’98 — Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics & 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Vol. 1, pp. 646–652. Montreal, Canada, August 10–14, 1998. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Kaplan, R. M. (1987). Three seductions of computational psycholinguistics. In P. Whitelock, M. Wood, H. Somers, R. Johnson & P. Bennett (Eds.), Linguistic Theory and Computer Applications, pp. 149–188. London: Academic Press.
Kay, M. (1982). Algorithm schemata and data structures in syntactic processing. In S. Allen (Ed.), Text Processing. Text Analysis and Generation. Text Typology and Attribution. Proceedings of the “Nobel Symposium 51” , Vol. 16, Data Linguistica, pp. 327–358. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Lavie, A. & M. Tomita (1996). GLR*: an efficient noise-skipping parsing algorithm for context-free grammars. In H. Bunt & M. Tomita (Eds.), Recent Advances in Parsing Technology, Vol. 1, Text, Speech and Language Technology. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer.
Lombardo, V. & L. Lesmo (1998). Formal aspects and parsing issues of dependency theory. In COLING/ACL’98 — Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics & 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Vol. 2, pp. 787–793. Montreal, Canada, August 10–14, 1998. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
MacGregor, R. & R. Bates (1987). The LOOM Knowledge Representation Language. Technical Report RS-87–188: Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.
Marcus, M. (1980). A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Markert, K. & U. Hahn (1997). On the interaction of metonymies and anaphora. In IJCAI’97 — Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, pp. 1010–1015. Nagoya, Japan, August 23–29, 1997. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Mellish, C. S. (1989). Some chart-based techniques for parsing ill-formed input. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 102–109. Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 26–29 June 1989.
Menzel, W. (1994). Parsing of spoken language under time constraints. In A. Cohn (Ed.), ECAI’94 — Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 560–564. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, August 8–12 1994. Chichester: John Wiley.
Neuhaus, P. (1999). Nebenläufiges Parsing: Ein lexikalisch verteiltes Verfahren zur performanzgrammatischen Analyse beim Textverstehen, Vol. 194. DISKI. St. Augustin: infix. (Dissertation, Department for Applied Sciences, Universität Freiburg, 1997).
Neuhaus, P. & N. Bröker (1997). The complexity of recognition of linguistically adequate dependency grammars. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics & 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 337–343. Madrid, Spain, 7–12 July 1997. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Neuhaus, P. & U. Hahn (1996). Restricted parallelism in object-oriented lexical parsing. In COLING’96 — Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Vol. 1, pp. 502–507. Copenhagen, Denmark, August 5–9, 1996.
Robinson, J. J. (1975). Performance grammars. In D. R. Reddy (Ed.), Speech Recognition. Invited Papers Presented at the 1974 IEEE Symposium, pp. 401–427. New York: Academic Press.
Romacker, M., K. Markert & U. Hahn (1999). Lean semantic interpretation. In IJCAI’99 — Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2, pp. 868–875. Stockholm, Sweden, July 31 -August 6, 1999. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Schacht, S. & U. Hahn (1997). Temporal reasoning about actor programs. In E. Costa & A. Cardoso (Eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA’97 — Proceedings of the 8th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1323, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 279–290. Coimbra, Portugal, October 6–9, 1997. Berlin: Springer.
Schulz, S., M. Romacker, G. Faggioli & U. Hahn (1999). From knowledge import to knowledge finishing: automatic acquisition and semi-automatic refinement of medical knowledge. In B. Gaines, R. Kremer & M. Musen (Eds.), KAW’99 — Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, pp. 7–8–1–7–8–12. Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 16–21, 1999.
Shieber, S. M. (1986). An Introduction to Unification-based Approaches to Grammar, Vol. 4. CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
Strube, M. & U. Hahn (1995). ParseTalk about sentence- and text-level anaphora. In EACL’95 — Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 237–244. Dublin, Ireland, March 27–31, 1995.
Strube, M. & U. Hahn (1999). Functional centering: Grounding referential coherence in information structure. Computational Linguistics, 25(3):309–344.
Thibadeau, R., M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (1982). A model of the time course and content of reading. Cognitive Science, 6:157–203.
Uszkoreit, H. (1991). Strategies for adding control information to declarative grammars. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Berkeley, Cal., USA, 18–21 June 1991.
Winograd, T. (1983). Language as a Cognitive Process, Vol. 1, Syntax. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Woods, W. A. & J. G. Schmolze (1992). The Kl-One family. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23(2/5): 133–177.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hahn, U., Bröker, N., Neuhaus, P. (2000). Let’s Parsetalk — Message-Passing Protocols for Object-Oriented Parsing. In: Bunt, H., Nijholt, A. (eds) Advances in Probabilistic and Other Parsing Technologies. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9470-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9470-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5579-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9470-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive