Skip to main content

The Plausibility of Quality-of-Life Measures in Different Domains of Health Care

  • Chapter
Concepts and Measurement of Quality of Life in Health Care

Part of the book series: European Studies in Philosophy of Medicine 1 ((ESPM,volume 47))

Abstract

‘Quality of life’ is a key concept in the contemporary practice of medicine and delivery of health care. Numerous developments in modern medicine, such as psychotropic drugs, open heart surgery, and joint replacement surgery have the capacity to improve individuals’ quality of life. Conversely, many therapies, such as renal dialysis and ostomy surgery for cancer, whilest increasing survival may impose costs in reducing patients’ well-being. It would be impossible even to begin to sum up the costs and benefits of contemporary health care without resort to the notion of quality of life. The controversy associated with the emerging importance of the quality-of-life construct in health care is provoked by attempts to define, assess or measure the construct. Some critics even claim that quality-of-life constructs cannot and should not be measured. Their objections vary from arguments about the basic plausibility and validity of measurement systems [57], through to ethical and philosophical critiques regarding real-world applications of quality of life measurement systems [76]. The intensity of debate surrounding attempts to introduce measures of quality of life into health care suggests that measurement systems are widely adopted. In reality, in the diverse fields of research, clinical practice and resource allocation, resort to formal methods of quality of life assessment have been very few.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Aaronson, N.K.: 1989, ‘Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methodological issues’, Controlled Clinical Trials, 10, 196S-208S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlmen, M., Sullivan, M., and Bjelle, A.: 1988, ‘Team versus non-team outpatient care in rheumatoid arthritis: A comprehensive outcome evaluation including an overall health measure’, Arthritis and Rheumatism, 31 (4), 471–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad, W.I., Kernohan, E.E., and Baker, M.R: 1989, ‘Influence of ethnicity and unemployment on the perceived health of a sample of general practice attenders’, Community Medicine, 11 148–56.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, D., Lee, R.H., and Lowson, K: 1989, ‘The use of QALYs in health service planning’, International Journal of Health Planning Management, 4, 261–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Almy, T.: 1988, ‘Comprehensive functional assessment of elderly patients’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 109, 70–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, J., Sullivan, F., and Usherwood, T.: 1990, ‘The Medical Outcomes Study Instrument (MOSI) — use of a new health status measure in Britain’, Family Practice, 7, 205–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R.A., Pollard, W.E., Martin, D.P., and Gilson, B.S.: 1976, ‘The Sickness Impact Profile: Validation of a Health Status Measure’, Medical Care, 14, 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bijlsma, J.W., Huiskes, C.J., Kraaimaat, F.W., Vanderveen, M.J., and HuberBruning, O: 1991, ‘Relation between patients’ own health assessment and clinical and laboratory findings in rheumatoid arthritis’, Journal of Rheumatology, 18, 650–53.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bombardier, C., Ware, J., and Russell, I.: 1986, ‘Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis’, American Journal of Medicine, 81, 565–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brook, R. and Kamberg, C.: 1987; ‘General health status measures and outcome measurement: a commentary on measuring functional status’, Journal of Chronic Disease, 40, Suppl. 1, 131S–136S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks, W.B., Jordan, J.S., Divine, G.W., Smith, K.S., and Neelon, F.A.: 1990, ‘The impact of psychologic factors on measurement of functional status: assessment of the Sickness Impact Profile’, Medical Care, 28, 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, J., Kazis, L.E., Spitz, P., Gertman, P., Fries, J. F., and Meenan, R.F.: 1984 ‘The dimensions of health outcomes: a cross validated examination of health status measurement’, American Journal of Public Health, 74, 159–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Byrne, M.: 1992, ‘Cancer chemotherapy and quality of life’, British Medical of Journal, 304, 1523–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Caine, N., Harrison, S.C., Sharples, L.D., and Wallwork, J.: 1991, ‘Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting’, British Medical Journal, 302, 511–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carr-Hill, R.: 1989; ‘Assumptions of the QALY procedure’, Social Science & Medicine, 29, 469–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carr-Hill, R., and Morris, J.: 1991, ‘Current practice in obtaining the ‘Q’ in QALYs: a cautionary note’, British Medical Journal, 303, 699–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coates, A., Gebski, V., and Bishop, J.F. et al.: 1987, ‘Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer’, New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 1490–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cox, D.R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A., Gore, S.M., Spiegelhalter, D.J., and Jones, D.: 1992, ‘Quality of life assessment: can we keep it simple?’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society/Series A General, 155, 353–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Croog, S., Levine, S., Testa, M., Brown, B., Bulpitt, C., Jenkins, C., Klerman, G., and William, G.: 1986, ‘The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life’, New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1657–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Curtis, S.: 1987, ‘Self reported morbidity in London and Manchester: inter-urban and intra-urban variations’, Social Indicators Research, 19, 255–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deyo, R.: 1991, ‘The quality of life, research and care’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 114, 695–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Deyo, R.A.: 1988, ‘Measuring the quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis’, in S. Walker and R. Rosser (eds.), Quality of Life: Assessment and Applications, MTP Press, Leicester, pp. 205–22.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Deyo, R.A., Inui, T.S., Leininger, J., Leininger, D., and Overman, S.S.: 1983, ‘Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease. A comparison of traditional scales and a self-administered health status questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis’, Medical Care, 21, 180–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dixon, J., and Welch, H.G.: 1991, ‘Priority setting: lessons from Oregon’, Lancet, 337, 891–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellwood, P.: 1988; ‘Shattuck lecture — outcomes management. A technology of patient experience’, New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 1549–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Feinstein, A., and Wells, C.: 1977, ‘A new clinical taxonomy for rating change in functional activities of patients with angina pectoris’, American Heart Journal, 93, 172–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Feinstein, A.R.: 1983, ‘An additional basic science for clinical medicine: IV. The development of clinimetrics’, Annals of of Internal Medicine, 99, 843–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fitzpatrick, R., Ziebland, S., Jenkinson, C., Mowat, A., and Mowat, A.: 1991, ‘The social dimension of health status measures in rheumatoid arthritis’, International Disability Studies, 31, 34–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fitzpatrick, R., Ziebland, S., Jenkinson, C., Mowat, A., and Mowat, A.: 1992, ‘Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures’, Quality in Health Care, 1, 89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fossa, S., Aaronson, N., and Newling, D.: 1990, ‘Quality of life and treatment of hormone resistant metastatic cancer.’, European Journal of Cancer, 26, 1133–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fowler, F.J., Wennberg, J., Timothy, R.P., Barry, M.J., Mulley, A.G. and Hanley, E.: 1988, ‘Symptom status and the quality of life following prostatectomy’, Journal ofAmerican Medical Association, 259, 3018–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frankel, S.: (1991), ‘Health needs, health-care requirements and the myth of infinite demand’, Lancet, 337, 1588–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Frankel, S.: 1992, ‘The epidemiology of indications’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 45, 257–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fries, J.F., Spitz, P.W. and Young, D.Y.: 1982, ‘The dimensions of health outcome: The Health Assessment Questionnaire, Disability and Pain Scales’, Journal of Rheumatology, 9, 789–93.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Froberg, D.G., and Lane, R.L.: 1989, ‘Methodology for measuring health-state preferences-III: population and context effects’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 585–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Greenfield, S.: 1989 ‘The state of outcome research: are we on target?’, New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 1142–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harvey, R.M., Doyle, E.F., and Ellis, K., et al.: 1974, ‘Major changes made by the criteria committee of the New York Heart Association’, Circulation, 49, 390–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Helewa, A., Goldsmith, C.H., Lee, P., Bombardier, C., Hanes, B., Smythe, H.A., and Tugwell,P.: 1991, ‘Effects of occupational therapy home service on patients with rheumatoid arthritis’, Lancet, 337, 1453–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Henderson, S., Byrne, D., and Duncan Jones, P.: 1981, Neurosis and the Social Environment, Sydney, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hopkins, A.: 1991 ‘Approaches to medical audit’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 45, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hopton, J.L., Porter, A.M. and Howie, J.G.: 1991, ‘A measure of perceived health in evaluating general practice: the Nottingham Health Profile’, Family Practice, 8, 253–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hunt, S., McEwen, J., and McKenna, S.: 1985, ‘Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists’, Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 35, 185–88.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hunt, S.M., McEwen, J., and McKenna, S.P.: 1986, Measuring Health Status Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hutchinson, A., and Fowler, P.,: 1992 ‘Outcome measures for primary care: what are the research priorities?’, British Journal of General Practice, 42, 227–31.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Johnstone, A., and Goldberg, D.P.: 1976, ‘Psychiatric screening in general practice.’, Lancet, I, 605–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kazis, L.E., Callahan, L.F., Meenan, R.F., and Pincus, T.: 1990, ‘Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 1243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kind, P., and Carr-Hill, R.: 1987, ‘The Nottingham Health Profile: A Useful Tool For Epidemiologists?’, Social Science & Medicine, 25, 905–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. La Puma, J., and Lawlor, E.F.: 1990, ‘Quality-adjusted life-years: ethical implications for physicians and policymakers’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 2917–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Loomes, G., McKenzie, L.: 1989, ‘The use of QALYs in health care decisionmaking’, Social Science & Medicine, 28, 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. MacKenzie, C.R., Charlson, M.E., DiGiola, D., and Kelley, K.: 1986, ‘A patientspecific measure of change in maximal function’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 146, 1325–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Martin, J., and Elliot, D.: 1992, ‘Creating an overall measure of severity of disability for the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Disability Survey’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society/ Series A General, 155, 121–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McKenna, S., and Payne, R.: 1989, ‘Comparison of the General Health Questionnaire and the Nottingham Health Profile in a study of unemployed and re-employed men’, Family Practice, 6, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. McNeill, B., Weichselbaum, R., and Pauker, G.: 1978, ‘Fallacy of the five year survival in cancer’, New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 1397–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Meenan, R.F.: 1982, ‘The AIMS Approach to health status measurement: conceptual background and measurement properties’, Journal of Rheumatology, 9, 785–88.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mercier, M., Schraub, S., Bransfield, D., and Fournier, J.: 1992, ‘Patient acceptance and differential perceptions of quality of life measures in a French oncology setting’, Quality of Life Research, 1, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mor, V., and Guadagnoli, E.: 1988, ‘Quality of life measurement: a psychometric tower of Babel.’ Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 1055–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mulkay, M.J., Ashmore, M., and Pinch, T.J.: 1987, ‘Measuring the quality of life: a sociological invention concerning the application of economics to health care’, Sociology, 21, 541–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mulley, A.G.: 1990, ‘Medical decision making and practice variation’, in T. Andersen and G.Mooney (eds.), The Challenges of Medical Practice Variations, MacMillan, London, pp. 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mulley, A.G.: 1989, ‘Assessing patients’ utilities: can the ends justify the means?’, Medical Care, 27, S269–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Nelson, E.C., and Berwick, D.M.: 1989, ‘The measurement of health status in clinical practice’, Medical Care, 27, S77–S90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Nelson, E.C., Landgraf, J.M., Hays, R.D., Wasson, J.H., and Kirk J.W.: 1990, ‘The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians’ offices?’, Medical Care, 28, 1111–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Normand, C.,: ‘Economics, health and the economics of health’, British Medical Journal, 303, 1572–77.

    Google Scholar 

  63. O’Boyle, C., O’Boyle, A., McGee, H., Hickey, A., O’Malley F., and O’Malley K., Joyce, C.R.: 1992, ‘Individual quality of life in patients udergoing hip replacement’, Lancet, 339, 1088–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. O’Connor, A.M., Boyd, N.F., Warde, P., Stolbach, L., and Till, J.E.: 1987, ‘Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences’, Journal of Chronic Disease, 40, 811–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Olsson, G., Lubsen, J., van Es G.A., and Rehnqvist, N.: 1986, ‘Quality of life after myocardial infarction: effect of long term metoprolol on mortality and morbidity,’ British Medical Journal, 292, 1491–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Patrick, D., and Peach, H.: 1989, Disablement in the Community, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Patrick, D.L., Sittampalam, Y., Somerville, S.M., Carter, W.B., and Bergner, M.: 1985; ‘A cross cultural comparison of health status values’, American Journal of Public Health, 75, 1402–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Rawles, J.: 1989, ‘Castigating QALYs’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 15, 143–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Rosser, R., and Kind, P.: 1978, ‘A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus?’, International Journal of Epidemiology, 7, 347–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Rubinstein, L.V., Calkins, D.R., Young, R.T., Cleary, P., Fink, A., Kosecoff, J. et al.: 1989, ‘Improving patient function: a randomized trial of functional disability screening’, Annals of Internal Medicine, 111, 836–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sackett, D.L., and Torrance, G.W.: 1978, ‘The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public’, Journal of Chronic Disease, 31, 697–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Schmidt, V.: 1991, ‘Some equity-efficiency trade-offs in the provision of scarce goods: the case of lifesaving medical resources’, Working paper, Centre for Social Policy Research, University of Bremen, Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Schumacher, M., Olschewski, M., and Schulgen, G.: 1991, ‘Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials’, Statistics in Medicine, 10, 1915–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Seeman, T., and Berkman, L.: 1988 Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support? Social Science & Medicine, 26, 310–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Slevin, M.L., Plant, H., Lynch, D., Drinkwater, J., and Gregory, W.M.: 1988, ‘Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?’, British Journal of Cancer, 57, 109–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Smith, A.: 1987, ‘Qualms about QALYs’, Lancet, I, 1134–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Spitzer, W.O., Dobson, A.J., Hall, J., Chesterman, E., Levi, J., Shepherd, R. et al.: 1981, ‘Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL Index for use by physicians’, Journal of Chronic Disease, 34, 585–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sutherland, H.J., Lockwood, G.A., and Boyd, N.F.: 1990, ‘Ratings of the importance of quality of life variables: therapeutic implications for patients with metastatic breast cancer’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 661–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tarlov, A.R., Ware, J.E., Greenfield, S., Nelson, E., Perrin, E., and Zubkoff, M.: 1989 The Medical Outcomes Study. ‘An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care’, Journal of American Medical Association, 262, 925–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tugwell, P., Bombardier, C., Buchanan, W.W., Goldsmith, C., Grace, E., Bennett, K.J., Williams, J.H., et al.: 1990, ‘Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis; impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard item and individualised patient preference health status questionnaires’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 150, 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Tugwell, P., Bombardier, C., Buchanan, W.W., Goldsmith, C.H., Grace, E., and Hanna, B.: 1987, ‘The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire. An individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis’, Journal of Rheumatology, 14, 446–51.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Uhlmann, R.F., and Pearlman, R.A.: 1991, ‘Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults’, Archives of Internal Medicine, 151, 495–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wade, D.T.: 1991, ‘The ‘Q’ in QALYs’, British Medical Journal, 303, 1136–37.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ware, J., Brook, R.H., Rogers, W.H., Keeler, E., Ross Davies, A., Sherbourne, C.D. et al.: 1986, ‘Comparison of health outcomes at a health maintenance organisation with those of fee-for-service care’, Lancet, I, 1017–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Wennberg, J.E.: 1990, ‘On the need for outcomes research and the prospects for the evaluative clinical sciences’, in T. Andersen and G. Mooney (eds.), The Challenges of Medical Practice Variations. Macmillan, London, pp. 158–73.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wennberg, J.E., Mulley, A., and Hanley, D.: 1988, ‘An assessment of prostatectomy for benign urinary tract obstruction’, Journal of American Medical Association, 259, 3027–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Wilkin, D., Hallam, L., and Dogett, M.: 1992, Measures of Need and Outcome for Primary Health Care, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wolfe, F., and Pincus, T.: 1991, ‘Standard self-report questionnaires in routine clinical and research practice — an opportunity for patients and rheumatologists’, Journal of Rheumatology, 18, 643–46.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Wolfe, F., Cathey, M.A.: 1991, ‘The assessment and prediction of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis’, Journal of Rheumatology, 18, 1298–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wolfe, F., Hawley, D.J., and Cathey, M.A.: 1991, ‘Clinical and health status measures over time: prognosis and outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis’, Journal of Rheumatology, 18, 1290–97.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wolfe, F., Kleinheksel, S.M., Cathay, M.A., Hawley, D.J., Spitz, P.W., and Fries, J.F.: 1988, ‘The clinical value of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Functional Disability Index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis’, Journal of Rheumatology, 15, 1480–48.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ziebland, S., Fitzpatrick, R., Jenkinson, C., Mowat, A., Mowat, A., (forthcoming). ‘A comparison of two approaches to measuring change in health status in rheumatoid arthritis: the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Modified HAQ’ (in press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitzpatrick, R., Albrecht, G. (1994). The Plausibility of Quality-of-Life Measures in Different Domains of Health Care. In: Nordenfelt, L. (eds) Concepts and Measurement of Quality of Life in Health Care. European Studies in Philosophy of Medicine 1, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8344-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8344-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4398-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8344-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics