Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 236))

  • 226 Accesses

Abstract

I want to motivate and develop a version of the idea that the level of syntactical representation called “LF’ in Chomskyan grammar should be construed as instantiating the properties that philosophers have traditionally ascribed to logical form and as such makes a substantial contribution to semantics.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bach. E. [ 1968 ]. Nouns and Noun Phrases. In E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Reinhart, Winston, pp. 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. [ 1989 ]. The Situation in Logic. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, G. [ 1983 ]. Logical Form: Types of Evidence. Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. [ 1975 ]. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. [1977]. Essays on Form and interpretation. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. [ 1981 ]. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. [ 1986 ]. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. [ 1983 ]. Quantification and Syntactic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. [ 1967 ]. Truth and Meaning. Synthese 17, 304–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. [ 1975 ]. Semantics for Natural Languages. in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. New York: Dickenson, pp. 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Etchemendy, J. [ 1983 ]. The Doctrine of Logic as Form. Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. [ 1972 ]. Deep Structure as Logical Form. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 25–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. [ 1975 ]. Logical Form. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.) The Logic of Grammar. New York: Dickenson, pp. 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. [ 1980 ]. Pronouns and Bound Variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 679–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. [ 1987 ]. On Semantics. In E. LePore (ed.) New Directions in Semantics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J., and R. May [ 1981 ] “Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing,” Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. [ 1974 ]. Quantifiers and Quantification Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 5, 153–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. [ 1989 ]. Logical Form and Linguistic Theory. In A. George (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J., and J. Kulas [1985]. Anaphora and Definite Descriptions. Dordrecht Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu [ 1991 ]. The Methodology of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, N. [ 1984 ]. Logic as Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. [ 1983 ]. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. [1977]. Speaker Reference and Semantic Reference. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr., and H. K. Wettstein, Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 6–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. [ 1971 ]. On Generative Semantics. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 232–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. [1972]. Linguistics and Natural Logic. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 545–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J. [ 1968 ]. The Role of Semantics in Grammar. In E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Reinhart, Winston, pp. 125–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J. [ 1972 ]. A Program for Logic. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 498–544.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. [ 1985 ]. Logical Form: its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. [ 1990 ]. Descriptions, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. [ 1978 ]. Syntactic Domains for Semantic Rules. In F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 107–130.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. [ 1983 ]. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croon Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., and A. N. Whitehead [ 1927 ]. Principia Mathematica, vol. I, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. [ 1980 ]. “’Most’ and ‘All’: Some Comments on a Familiar Programme, and on the Logical Form of Quantified Sentences,” in M. Platts (ed.), Reference, Truth, and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 318–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. [ 1977 ]. Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neale, S. (1994). What is Logical Form? . In: Prawitz, D., Westerståhl, D. (eds) Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala. Synthese Library, vol 236. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8311-4_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8311-4_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4365-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8311-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics