Abstract
In the preceding chapters a special kind of compositional grammar, M-grammar, has been introduced to describe the form and meaning (or more precisely: translational equivalence) of expressions. The basic idea of compositional grammars, e.g. Montague’s PTQ (Thomason (1974)), is that they relate form and meaning in a very direct way. Such grammars usually have a strong semantic bias, in the following sense: in a compositional grammar basic expressions are associated with a basic meaning, and syntactic rules are associated with a meaning operation, and it is the proper composition of the meaning of an expression which determines how many and which syntactic steps to form an expression are distinguished. This semantic bias is essential given the translation method adopted, but it might lead to a grammar which is less adequate from a syntactic point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosetta, M.T. (1994). Compositionality and syntactic generalisations. In: Compositional Translation. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 273. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8306-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8306-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5797-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8306-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive