Abstract
California’s legislative term limits have dramatically reduced campaign expenditures. Real expenditures during the three general elections after the term limits initiative passed in 1990 were lower than in even 1976. This drop has occurred at the same time that races have become closer contests and more candidates are running for office. By any measure, term limits have coincided with large changes in the level of political competition, even before term limits have forcibly removed a single politician from office. The changes are so large that more incumbents are being defeated, races are closer, more candidates are running, and fewer single candidate races than occur at any other time during our sample period from 1976 to 1994.
We would like to thank Gertrud Fremling and Beth Garrett for their helpful comments. Jennifer Mayer and Michelle The also provided helpful research assistance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, K. (1995). The Great Money Chase. Published by California Common Cause, April.
Besley, T. and Case, A. (1995). Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 769–798.
Coats, M. and Dalton, T. (1992). Entry barriers in politics and uncontested elections. Journal of Public Economics 49: 75–90.
Crain, W.M. and Tollison, R.D. (1976). Campaign expenditures and political competition. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 177–188.
Crain, W.M. and Tollison, R.D. (1977). Attenuated property rights and the market for governors. Journal of Law and Economics 20: 205–212.
Dick, A.R. and Lott, J.R. Jr. (1993). Reconciling voters behavior with legislative term limits. Journal of Public Economics 50: 1–14.
Garratt, E. (1996). Political ambition and term limitations. University of Chicago Law School Working Paper.
Jung, A.-R., Kenny, L.W. and Lott, J.R. Jr. (1994). An explanation for why Senators from the same State vote differently so frequently. Journal of Public Economics 54: 65–96.
Lott, J.R. Jr. (1987a). Political cheating. Public Choice 52: 169–186.
Lott, J.R. Jr. (1987b). The effect of nontransferable property rights on the efficiency of political markets: Some evidence. Journal of Public Economics 32: 231–246.
Lott, J.R. Jr. (1989). Explaining challengers’ campaign expenditures: The importance of sunk nontransferable brand name. Public Finance Quarterly 17: 108–1118.
Lott, J.R. Jr. (1995). A simple explanation for why campaign expenditures are increasing: The government is getting bigger. University of Chicago School of Law Working Paper.
Lott, J.R. Jr. and Bronars, S.G. (1993). Time series evidence on shirking by members of the U.S. House of Representatives. Public Choice 76: 125–150.
Lott, J.R. Jr. and Davis, M.L. (1992). A critical review and an extension of the political shirking literature, co-authored with M.L. Davis. Public Choice 74: 461–484.
Lott, J.R. Jr. and Reed, W.R. (1989). Shirking and sorting in a model of finite-lived politicians. Public Choice 61(1): 75–96.
Rabin, J.L. (1988). With Prop. 73, it won’t be politics as usual next year. The Los Angeles Times, Sunday, 2 June, Part 2: 8.
Reed, W.R. and Schansberg, D.E. (1992). The behavior of congressional tenure over time: 1953–1991. Public Choice 73: 183–203.
Reed, W.R. and Schansberg, D.E. (1994). An analysis of congressional term limits. Economic Inquiry 32: 79–91.
Reed, W.R. and Schansberg, D.E. (1995). The House under term limits: What would it look like? Social Science Quarterly 76: 699–716.
Roberts, R.D. (1984). A positive model of private charity and public transfers. Journal of Political Economy 92: 136–148.
Sacramento Bee News Service. (1996). Reform initiative OK’d for ballot. McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., 28 February.
Snyder, J.M. Jr. (1990). Campaign contributions as investments: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1980–1986. Journal of Political Economy 98: 1195–1227.
Snyder, J.M. Jr. (1992). Long-term investing in politicians; or, give early, give often. Journal of Law and Economics 35: 15–44.
Stanksy, L. (1991). Campaign finance limits argued at 9th Circuit. The Recorder. Wednesday, 24 April: 2.
Yen, S.T., Coats, R.M. and Dalton, T.R. (1992). Brand-name investment of candidates and district homogeneity: An ordinal reponse model. Southern Economic Journal 58: 988–1001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daniel, K., Lott, J.R. (1997). Term limits and electoral competitiveness: Evidence from California’s state legislative races. In: Rowley, C.K. (eds) Constitutional Political Economy in a Public Choice Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5728-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5728-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6416-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5728-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive