Skip to main content

Comparison between rectopexy by laparoscopy and laparotomy for complete rectal prolapse:clinical and functional results

  • Chapter
Advances in Abdominal Surgery

Summary

Purpose The aim of this rectrospective study was to compare functional and clinical results of rectopexy by laparotomy and laparoscopy in 2 homogeneous groups of patients with complete rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keighley MRB, Fielding JWT, William J A Results oh Marlex Mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983; 70: 229–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pemberton J, Stalker LK. Surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 1939; 109: 799.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mc Cue JL, Thomson JPS. Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 921–923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berman IR. Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 689–693.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, MacKeigan JM. Rectopexy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993, 3: 339–343.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1959; 52: 805–813.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence.Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 482–487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Young AC. A new method for studying gut transit time using radiopaque markers. Gut 1969; 10: 842–847.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1978; 75: 623–631.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Costalat G, Garrigues JM, Drawed F, Veyrac M, Vernhet J. Rectopexie antero-posterieure pour troubles de la statique rectale: resultats cliniques et radiologiques.Interet de la rectographie numerisee.A propos de trente cas. Ann Chir 1989; 43: 733–743.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenhalgh T. Papers that tell you what things cost (economic analyses). BMJ 1997; 315: 596–599.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC, MacGregor AB. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse in associated with recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrences: results of a prospective, randomized study. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1431–1433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frykman HM, Goldberg SM. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969; 129: 1225–1230.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blatchford GJ, Perry RE, Christiansen MA, Thorson AG. Rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1989; 158: 574–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mann CV, Hoffman C. Complete rectal prolapsethe anatomical and functional results of treatment by extended abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 34–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshioka K, Heyen F, Keighley MRB. Functional results after posterior abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 835–838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Farouk R, Duthie GS, MacGregor AB, Bartolo DCC. Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shafik A. Pudendal canal syndrome decompression in the treatment of idiopatic faecal incontinence. Dig Surg 1992; 9: 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shafik A. Pudendal canal syndrome. Description of a new syndrome and its treatment Report of seven cases. Coloproctology 1991; 13: 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu CY. Laparoscopic treatment for genuine urinary stress incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 8: 789–798.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Darzy A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, et al. Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Milson JW. Current role of laparoscopy in rectal prolapse. Proceedings of The Eighth Annual Colorectal Disease in 1997, Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fort Lauderdale 1997; 651–657.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wexner SD, Cheope JD, Jose MN Jorge, Heyman S, Jagelman DC. Biofeedback for costipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 145–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boccasanta, P., Peracchia, A. (1999). Comparison between rectopexy by laparoscopy and laparotomy for complete rectal prolapse:clinical and functional results. In: Zanella, E. (eds) Advances in Abdominal Surgery. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4469-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4469-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5914-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4469-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics