Skip to main content

Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals

  • Chapter
Computing Meaning

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 73))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S., and Pereira, F. (1991) Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(4).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. (1993) Transsentential Meditations. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enç, M. (1986) Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(3):405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo, R. and May, R. (1994) Indices and Identity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. and Kamp, H. (1997) On context dependence in modal constructions. In SALT-97, Stanford, CA. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. (1995) Presupposing. PhD thesis, University of Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. (1990) Dynamic Montague grammar. In Kálmán, L. and Pólos, L., editors, Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, pages 3–48, Budapest. Akadémiai Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., and Weinstein, S. (1995) Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, D. (1993) VP Ellipsis: Form, Meaning, and Processing. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, D. (1999) Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(2): 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, E. (1986) Temporal anaphora in discourses of English. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(l):63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibble, R. (1994) Dynamics of epistemic modality and anaphora. In Bunt, H., Muskens, R., and Rentier, G., editors, International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg, NL. ITK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibble, R. (1995) Modal subordination, focus and complement anaphora. In Proceedings of the Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic and Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1989) An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12:607–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lascarides, A. and Asher, N. (1991) Discourse relations an defeasible knowledge. In Proceedings of ACL 29, pages 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K. (1973) Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R. (1995) Tense and the logic of change. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language, volume 114 of Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pages 147–184. John Benjamins, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, R. (1996) Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19(2): 143–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H. (1973) Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy, 70:601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H. (1984) Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7(3):243–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portner, P. (1994) Modal discourse referents and the semantics-pragmatics boundary. Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1947) Elements of Symbolic Logic. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. (1995) Interface strategies. Manuscript, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. (1986) Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. (1989) Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12(6):683–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeboe, K. J. (1996) Anaphoric presuppositions and zero anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19(2):187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1997) The anaphoric parallel between modality and tense. Technical Report IRCS 97–6 and CIS 97–9, University of Pennsylvania. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Sandt, R. (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9(2):333–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B. L. (1988) Tense as discourse anaphor. Computational Linguistics, 14(2):61–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stone, M., Hardt, D. (1999). Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4231-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0290-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4231-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics