Abstract
What is the role of states in creating market order and competition? In the early nineties the dominant answer to this question was that the best way states could contribute to the emergence of market order is to reduce their role within the economy and liberate economic activity from state intervention. Once the necessary level of economic freedom has been attained, once economic activity became a private business by way of liberating prices and trade and privatizing property, market order and competition will come about. This was the advice given to the post-communist countries by the international financial agencies that have measured progress in economic reform in the attained level of economic freedom, and this idea played the dominant role in the choice of policies introduced in the countries of the region. Behind the idea that it is freedom from the state that is the necessary condition for the emergence of market order, one can find two interrelated beliefs. The first is the (not so neo-)liberal belief in the capacity of self-regulating markets to generate by way of the free pursuit of self-interests the norms of behavior and rules of conduct necessary for maintaining market order and competition. The second is the belief that states are anyway solely the sources of economic disorder.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aslund, A. (1999), Why Has Russia’s Economic Transformation Been So Arduous?, World Bank ABC DE Conference, draft.
Bank, World Bank (1996), From Plan to Market, Oxford University Press
Bank, World Bank (1998), Knowledge for Development, Oxford University Press
Brezinski, H. D., Fritsch, M. (1996), The economic impact of new firms in post-socialist countries, bottom-up transformation in Eastern Europe, Cheltenham, UK, Brookfield, US, E. Elgar.
Brunetti, A.. Kisunko, G. Weder, B. (1998), Credibility of Rules and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector, The World Bank Economic Review 12 (N.3), 353–84.
Bruszt. L. (1999), Heterarchies and Developmental Traps, manuscript.
Commons, J. (1924), Legal Foundations of Capitalism, New York, Macmillan.
Durkheim, E. (1989), Division of Labor in Society, Macmillan.
EBRD (1998), Transition Report 1998, London, EBRD.
Foldvary, F. (Ed.), (1996), Beyond Neoclassical Economics: Heterodox Approaches to Economic Theory, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
Gaddy, C. a. I., Barry W. (1998), Russia’s Virtual Economy, Foreign Affairs 77(5).
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J. (1961), The Federalist Papers: The New American Library.
Hellman, J. (1998), “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reforms in Postcommunist Transitions” World Politics 50 (Jan. 98).
Hodgson, G., Samuels, W. Tool, M. (Eds.), (1994), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ickes, B. W. (1999), Detour on the Road to Market: Roots of the Virtual Economy and its Evolution.
Johnson, J. (1971), Russia’s Emerging Financial Industrial Groups, Post-Soviet Affairs 13(4), 333–365.
Karlova, E. (1997), Financial-Industrial Groups,lndustrial Policy, and Competition in the Russian Federation, in I. Lieberman, Nestor, S., Desai, R. (Eds.) Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, The World Bank/Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
Kuznetsov, Y. (1997), Learning in Networks, in J. Nelson, Tilly, Ch. Walker, L. (Eds.) Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies, Washington D.C., National Academy Press
Lazear, E. P. (1995), Economic transition in Eastern Europe and Russia: realities of reform, Stanford, California, Hoover Institution Press
Manin, B. (1994), Checks, balances and boundaries: the separation of powers in the constitutional debate of 1787, in B. Fontana (Ed.) The Invention of the Modern Republic: Cambridge University Press
McDermott, G. (1998), The Communist Aftermath: Industrial Networks and the Politics of Institution Building in the Czech Republic, Political Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Nekipelov, A. (1998), The Nature of Russia’s Economic Catastrophe-An Alternative Diagnosis, Transition 9(5), 5–8.
North, D., Weingast, Barry (1989), Constitutions and Credible Commitments: The Evolution of the Institutions of Public Choice, Journal of Economic History.
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York, Cambridge University Press
O’Donnell, G. (1999), Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies, in S. e. al. (Ed.) The Self-Restraining State, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
OECD (1997), Economic Surveys 1997-98, Russian Federation 1997: OECD.
Polishchuk, L. (1997), Missed Markets: Implications for Economic Behavior and Institutional Change, in J. Nelson, Tilly, Ch., Walker, L. (Eds.) Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies, Washington D.C/, National Academy Press
Popov, V. (1998), Output Change During Transition: The Role of Initial Conditions and Economic Policy, Voprosy Ekonomiky 7 in Russian.
Popov, V. (1999), Internationalization of the Russian Economy: What Went Wrong, Emergo, Journal of Transforming Economies and Societies 5(2), 53–85.
Posner, R. (1992), Economic Analysis of Law, 4th Edition, Little Brown and Company.
Samuels, W. (1992), Essays on the Economic Role of Government, New York, New York University Press
Samuels, W. (1996), Reader’s Guide to John R. Commons, Legal Foundations of Capitalism, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Archival Supplement Archival Supplement 5, 1–61.
Schedler, A., Diamond, L. Plattner, M. (Eds.), (1999), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, London, Lynne Riener Publishers.
Schleifer, A. and. Robert, V. (1998), The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures, Cambridge, Harvard University Press
Sklar, M. (1992), The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism, 1890–1916, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney, Cambridge University Press
Solnick, S. (1998), Russia Over the Edge, Eastern European Constitutional Review.
Stark, D. and Bruszt, L. (1998), Post-Socialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in Eastern Europe, New York, Cambridge University Press
Stiglitz, J. (1998), More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Toward The Post-Washington Consensus, UNU/W1DER.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1999), Wither Reform ?, World Bank Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics.
Stoner-Weiss, K.. (1997), Local Heroes The Political Economy of Russia Regions, Princeton, Princeton University Press
Thornton, J. (1997), Restructuring Production Without Market Infrastructure, in J. Nelson, Tilly, Ch., Walker, L. (Eds.), Transforming Post-Communist Economies, Washington D.C., National Academy Press
Treisman, D. (1998), Fighting Inflation in a Transitional Regime:Russia’s Anomalous Stabilization, World Politics 50(2), 235–65.
Weber, M. (1978), Sociological Categories of Economic Action (Economy and Society, An Outline of Interpretive Sociology), Berkeley, University of California Press
Weingast, B. (1995), The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development, The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 11(1), 1–31.
Weisman, A. (1995), Notes and Comment: Separation of Powers in Post Communist Government: A Constitutional Case Study of the Russian Federation, The American University Journal of International Law and Policy (Summer 1995).
Williamson, O. (1994), The Institutions and Governance of Economic Development and Reform.
Woodruff, D. (1998), Why Market Liberalism and the Ruble’s Value are Sinking Together, Eastern European Constitutional Review.
Woodruff, D. (1999), Institutional Theory, Russia and the New Politics of Economic Backwardness, St. Petersburg, European University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bruszt, L. (2000). Constituting Markets: the Case of Russia and the Czech Republic. In: Dobry, M. (eds) Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe. The GeoJournal Library, vol 55. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4162-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4162-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5813-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4162-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive